Aristotle on Everything CLAS
3990/PHIL 3990B
Syllabus and Schedule
Professor Jacques A. Bailly
School of World Languages and Cultures, Classics Program
231 Old Mill
jacques.bailly@uvm.edu
Office Hours: TR 11:30-12:30
This syllabus is an online one: any paper copy may go out of date.
The links in the syllabus start out mostly 'dead,' but are made
'live' as the semester rolls along.
Schedule:
NOTE WELL: Readings are listed under the day on which they
are due. That is, they should be completed by that day's class.
"Argument analyses" are also listed on the day they are due: that
is, they should be completed by that day's class.
RESERVE MATERIAL AVAILABLE AT BAILEY/HOWE:
ACTA="A Companion to
Aristotle," Blackwell, 2009.
CCTA="The Cambridge
Companion to Aristotle," Cambridge, 1995.
- Introductory Classes
- Tues., Aug. 27
- Thur., Aug. 29
- Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy: Aristotle:
sections 1-5 (Bailly Notes on
that reading).
- Argument Analysis: Posterior Analytics
I.3 (72b5-27) (knowledge via demonstration and
primary things)
- For what an 'argument analysis' is, see notes below: in
brief, it is meant to be a clear and logical outline IN
YOUR OWN WORDS (i.e. NO QUOTATION, and NO AI) of the claims
that are argued for in the passage, the reasons
given in the passage for those claims, and a clear
identification of the logical structure of that argument.
- Week 2
- Tues., Sept. 3
- Thur., Sept. 5
- Week 3: CATEGORIES
- Tues., Sept. 10
- Thurs., Sept. 12
- Week 4: CAUSES
- Tues., Sept. 17 and Thur., Sept. 19
- Week 5: Non-Contradiction + Substance, Matter, and Form
- Tues., Sept. 24
- Non-Contradiction
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Aristotle on Non-Contradiction
- Aristotle Reading:
- Readings for Presentations:
- ACTA 8, 'The
Science and Axioms of Being' (incudes material on
non-contradiction)
- Looking ahead: Argument
Analysis for Oct.1: Metaphysics 1039b20-1040a8
- Thur., Sept. 26
- Substance, Matter, and Form
- Aristotle Readings:
- Metaphysics
4.1-6
- Metaphysics
7.1-17
- Metaphysics
8.1-6
- Readings for Presentations:
- ACTA 10,
'Form and Matter': Cameron Boisture and Owen
Bradley-Meal
- Week 6: continue last week's topics + LOGIC
- Tues., Oct. 1
- Thur., Oct. 3
- Week 7: Logic continuation + Demonstrative Knowledge and
Definition
- Tues., Oct. 8
- Thur., Oct. 10
- Looking ahead: ARGUMENT
ANALYSIS for Oct. 15: Posterior Analytics
74a18-74b4
- Aristotle Readings:
- Posterior Analytics
1.1-10
- Posterior Analytics
1.22
- Posterior Analytics
2.8-10
- Posterior Analytics
2.19
- Topics 1.5
- Topics 6.4
- Readings for Presentations:
- CCTA 4,
'Philosophy of Science': Oliver Hall and Iris Hannon
- ACTA 4,
'Aristotle's Theory of Demonstration'
- Week 8 Demonstration and Definition continuation plus
Physics
- Tues., Oct. 15
- DUE TODAY: ARGUMENT
ANALYSIS for Oct. 15: Posterior Analytics
74a18-74b4
- Aristotle Readings:
- Readings:
- ACTA 5,
'Empiricism and the First Principles of Aristotelian
Science'
- Thur., Oct. 17
- Week 9 Physics
- Tues., Oct. 22
- Aristotle Readings:
- de Generatione et
Corruptione 1.1-5
- de Partibus
Animalium 1.1, 1.5
- de Motu Animalium
7
- Readings for Presentations
- CCTA Chapter
5 'Science': Ziqin Ma and Elizabeth Nelson
- ACTA Chapter
16 'Aristotle on the Infinite, Space, and Time': Alexa
Newhouse and Olivia Renkert
- Wednesday Oct. 23, 12 noon: guest lecture by Joel
Christensen on Homer's Odyssey (Patrick Leahy building 102):
extra credit opportunity to expand your horizons
- recommended that you take a glance at this
before the lecture (but not strictly necessary)
- Thur., Oct. 24
- Presentation Reading
- ACTA 15
'Mixing the Elements': Thaddeus Shain and Mia Zweiback
- Week 10 The Soul
- Tues., Oct. 29
- Possible Reading
- CCTA 6,
'Psychology'
- ACTA 18 'The
Aristotelian psyche'
- ACTA 19
'Sensation and Desire'
- Bailly Notes:
- Thur., Oct. 31
- Week 11 Ethics
- Tues., Nov. 5
- Aristotle Reading: Nicomachean
Ethics.
- especially 1.1-13, 2.1-7, 3.1-5
- Presentation Reading
- CCTA 7
'Ethics'
- ACTA 24
'Happiness and the Structure of Ends'
- Bailly Notes:
- Thur., Nov. 7
- ARGUMENT ANALYSIS: changed to be due next class
- Presentation Reading
- ACTA 25:
'Pleasure'
- ACTA 27: 'Courage'
- ACTA 26-30
- Week 12 Ethics Continued
- Tues., Nov. 12
- Thur., Nov. 14:
- Week 13 Politics
- Tues., Nov. 19 and Thur., Nov. 21
- Aristotle Reading: Politics
- Week 14 Poetics and Rhetoric
- Aristotle reading: Poetics
and Rhetoric.
- Tues., Dec. 3 and Thur., Dec. 5
- ACTA 37
- ACTA 39:
'Aristotle's Poetics: the aim of tragedy'
- CCTA 9
'Rhetoric and Poetics'
- ACTA 38, 40
- Final
Exam Study Guide
- REVIEW SESSION: TBA : Classics Seminar room: Waterman ???
3 PM today (thursday the 5th).
- FINAL EXAM: Dec. 9, 10:30-1:15
Texts:
The Complete Works of Aristotle,
edited by Jonathan Barnes, Princeton. 2 volumes.
COURSE PHILOSOPHY
This course covers the philosophy of Aristotle, perhaps the most
impressive and wide-ranging intellectual figures ever to have lived.
Authoritatively active in the fields that became Biology,
Meteorology, Geology, Physics, Chemistry, Ethics, Metaphysics,
Political Theory, Aesthetics, Rhetoric, Psychology, History,
Literature, and more, Aristotle's range of interest and
accomplishment is without parallel.
Various good reasons to study Aristotle include:
1) Some of his thought may get the world right (or maybe just point
in fruitful directions), particularly in the realm of philosophy,
where he is still read for his philosophical ideas.
2) His role in intellectual history can hardly be overestimated.
3) He thinks and makes his reader think hard.
4) He offers a model of careful, clear, and precise thought.
Aristotle is a difficult author, very difficult. But we have two
things going for us: 1) Our translation is good. 2) I love
Aristotle. I will do what I can to infect you, but I expect my
greatest ally will be the brilliance of Aristotle himself.
What you can expect to get out of this course: 1) Exposure to a
broad range of Aristotle's works, 2) knowledge of key Aristotelian
concepts and approaches, and 3) respect for and appreciation of
Aristotle's magnificent accomplishment. 4) Argumentative analytical
skill. 5) Concise, precise, writing skills.
To a great degree, I employ a "principle
of charity" in my teaching: namely, if I don't understand
what Aristotle says, I assume he is right (I am "charitable" towards
him) and I am wrong or perhaps have simply not yet arrived at
understanding. I hope you will always do that with Aristotle.
I sometimes "suck up all the air in the room" when I am teaching: it
is not my finest trait. Please stop me by asking questions, by
demanding better explanations, by challenging me: don't just let me
go on if you don't understand or have significant disagreements with
what I say.
Procedure:
The classes will ordinarily proceed as follows.
- Before class:
- you read the Aristotle reading for the week. Reading it
twice is essential if you hope to have a clue (you will see
what I mean): Aristotle has not survived for so long because
he is easy. He rewards and requires re-reading.
- read any secondary reading that is required: Stanford
Encyclopedia readings are required. Articles, such as those in
ACTA and CCTA, are NOT required, merely recommended.
- Student presentations, if there are any student presentations
for the day.
- Lecture/discussion: in the remaining time, I will lecture on
the material assigned supplemented by secondary readings (which
are indicated on the schedule and you may read as well: this is
a good idea, but not required). Interrupt me frequently (and
respectfully, with an understanding that sometimes we need to
move on). I am most happy if the class turns into a good
discussion with many of you honestly and persuasively
disagreeing with me or each other. I am extremely happy if the
discussion includes many people and not always the same people.
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS:
FIRST, SOME IMPORTANT NOTES ABOUT WRITTEN
WORK: Experience has taught me to be explicit about
these things and to put them in the syllabus.
- Use non-sexist language. Plato talks about "men," because he
lived in an almost uniformly sexist world and was himself
sexist, but you should talk about "people" and "humans."
- Related to this, it used to be just wrong to write something
like "When one reads Plato, they should be
aware that they are reading a translation." It is now,
in this class, correct.
- Be careful about grammar: you can use grammatically
correct non-sexist language.
- If an assignment is to be printed, printing problems are
not an excuse: try telling your boss that you missed a
deadline because you didn't plan well enough to get the document
printed in time. Just once would be too much. Don't go to the
library to print it right before class. Plan.
- Deadlines are firm.
- If you are having a time-crunch problem, let me know by email
AHEAD OF TIME. The day of is too late for an extension.
Telling me the day after is just plain disrespectful and a
horrible habit to be in. I understand full well that sometimes
there is too much to do, and I will be flexible IF you foresee
it and responsibly address it. That is one of those "soft
skills" people talk about and will serve anyone well.
- Late work is simply not accepted. You can simply have that
argument analysis be the one that is dropped or do another
presentation.
- ALWAYS keep copies of your work, both a hard
copy and an electronic copy.
TYPES OF WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS IN THIS CLASS:
- Daily Comments: In
place of taking formal attendance, you will hand in
to me at the end of class a comment having to do with the class.
I read them to get an idea of how the class is going, what your
concerns are, whether the material is working, what interests
you, what you want to know more about, etc. Inappropriate
comments and those that simply say "I was here" will not count:
the comments must be something of genuine interest to you and a
propos of the class and your role in it. At the end of the
semester, I will count up how many each of you handed in. If you
hand in a daily comment on every class session MINUS 2 sessions,
you will receive 100% credit for attendance/daily comments. In
other words, you can miss two without losing any credit. Beyond
that, you start losing.
- Argument Analyses
- At least 13 times this semester, you will be asked to
analyze a small part of Aristotle's text.
- Your top ten grades on these count.
- The aim of this exercise is:
- To engage with the text directly by attempting to lay out
in a numbered-bullet-pointed list the argument in it
in your own words. To do this you will be asked the
following:
- To extract the argument from a passage
- an argument is a claim + reasons for the claim
- each claim and each reason gets its own bullet point
- very important: for each bullet point, you must
give a Bekker page, letter, and line number that
indicates precisely where you found it in Aristotle.
- most passages of Aristotle have arguments in them:
sometimes a passage will not have an argument, but
rather a series of connected claims: in that case,
explain the claims and the links between them.
- To put the argument into your own words: do not
quote unless absolutely necessary and do not use AI.
- To construct an argument that works logically or
identify precisely why it does not
- To identify key assumptions that are necessary for the
argument to work
- To assess and think about the argument
- If you think there is a flaw in the argument, first
try assuming that you have simply missed something.
Usually Aristotle is right as long as you accept his
assumptions. So identify the assumptions.
- The format:
- Arguments should be presented in numbered steps, with
bullet points, much like the following trivial argument:
- Every Seuqcaj wears a vest. (Bekker page, letter, and
line number)
- Every Ylliab is a Seuqcaj. (Bekker page, letter, and
line number)
- Therefore, by 1 and 2, every Ylliab wears a vest.
(Bekker page, letter, and line number)
- Note that each step is numbered, and the first two are
the evidence/reasons for the third. The third refers to
the first two by number. Evidence/reasons must preceed the
conclusion.
- very important: referring to the numbers of the
previous steps that logically necessitate a conclusion
IS what makes an argument: this is not optional
- We will see many such arguments presented in class:
observe their format and follow it and you will do better
and better on subsequent assignments. Those of you who have
taken logic classes will have a small advantage here and
will be able to help us all out, I hope.
- These assignments are to be no longer than one page.
- Don't use font smaller than 10 point. You may single space
and use narrow margins, however.
- Put your argument analysis on the front of the page.
- The back of the page should contain at least one
solid alternative to, criticism of, improvement on, or
devastating critique of Aristotle's argument. In other words,
it should significantly alter, help, or argue against
Aristotle. It cannot be just a claim or set of claims: it must
be an argument, a claim with some reasons why that claim
stands a good chance of being right.
- Timeline:
- Bring a copy of your argument analysis to class on the day
for which the text is assigned.
- Expect to exchange argument analyses with a fellow
student.
- Comment on your fellow student's argument and discuss it
briefly with each other. Ask questions. You may then very
quickly fix something if you think it needs it.
- NOTE WELL: I may not comment on every one of these analyses
carefully.
- If I fall too far behind, I will catch up by simply grading
without much comment.
- You can ALWAYS come talk to me about an argument analysis.
- Article Summaries and
Presentations:
- Scholarly articles are the basis of my lectures and your
presentations.
- For each article we cover, students will write a summary and
present that article's contents to the class.
- Each student must do one: anyone who wishes may do more than
one (grade will be average of however many a student does, or,
if Prof. Bailly thinks it more fair, some more favorable
formula).
- These articles are assigned because they cover important
aspects of Aristotle's thought. They are not easy. They are
cutting-edge contributions about current concerns by top
scholars.
- It is HIGHLY recommended that you get a hold of and read the
article well ahead of time.
- It is also HIGHLY recommended that you set up a meeting with
me to make sure you understand the basics of the article you
choose: you must set up that meeting ASAP, because I am
occasionally unavailable.
- There will be a sign-up sheet for the articles available
during the first part of the semester.
- An article summary should be no more than 3 pages long. That
means you have to pack material in tightly and use your words
carefully. If you think you can just get to 3 pages the night
before and be done, you are sorely mistaken. You should find
yourself with MUCH TOO MUCH to fit in and have to whittle it
down to 3 pages.
- A good summary does the following:
- States the most important conclusions of the article VERY
CLEARLY.
- Rehashes and identifies VERY CLEARLY the basic arguments
and evidence for those conclusions.
- Gives a VERY CLEAR idea of how the article is structured
by indicating:
- What each section of the article covers
- In what order the article proceeds and why in that order
- NOTE WELL: I SHOUTED out a things I want VERY CLEARLY done
in the article summaries: that means that no article summary
can be good without doing them very well and very clearly.
- As a lighter side note: don't use the word "very" in
your writing: it is very much overused.
- The idea is to reproduce the article's most important
claims and arguments and evidence for those claims.
- Put the ideas into your own words and phrases.
- Please DO NOT QUOTE verbatim from the article at all,
unless it is absolutely essential (I will be the judge of
that). 99% of this summary should be your own words.
- This is not an assignment that can be successfully completed
the night before it is due: a good summary will have gone
through much editing and careful thought.
- Suggested Timeline:
mandatory steps are boldfaced.
- 2 weeks ahead: read article. Underlining,
note-taking, and outlining as you read should help.
- 10 days ahead: write initial draft (significantly
longer than 3 pages)
- 9 days ahead: continue writing: start whittling down:
condense, analyze, rethink.
- 8 days ahead: revise, revise, revise. Writing center?
- 7 days ahead: proofread, read it aloud to yourself to
make sure it flows well, have friends read it and comment.
Remember the writing center!
- If you think you can condense the above three steps
into one day or less, think again. Good writing does not
happen over night. You need to put it down and come back to
it after some intervening time.
- 5 days ahead: e-mail
your summary with the subject "Article Summary" to me.
The e-mail subject line
must be "Article Summary" so that I know what to do with
it: otherwise it may get lost and you will not get credit.
This summary must be at least 3 pages long. WITHOUT THIS DRAFT,
YOU GET NO CREDIT FOR THE HARD COPY YOU WILL TURN IN 5 DAYS
FROM NOW.
- 3-4 days ahead: divide the task of presenting the
article with the other students who are doing the same
article.
- There are at least two tasks involved: the oral
presentation and the creation of a visual aid (i.e.
notes for the class and yourselves: these should be in a
simple html document).
- I do not have any particular format or division of
labor in mind, as long as you are all satisfied that you
are each treated fairly and treat the others fairly.
- Aim for 20 minutes.
- 2-4 days ahead: Rehearse: At least one day before
presentation: make sure that the on-line notes will be
available in the classroom. We can access the web as well as
your e-mail from the classroom, but do not assume that the
computer there has anything but an internet browser and old
and basic software. Do not risk arriving at class and not
having your visual aid working. It's a very good idea to
test your particular solution (e.g. accessing your email,
using a usb, etc.) the class session before.
- Day of presentation:
each person brings a hard copy of his or her own
individual summary to class to hand in to me.
THIS IS NOT WRITTEN BY THE GROUP: each individual does
their own work. This hard copy should be at most 3 pages and
should be a revision of the one you e-mailed me earlier. I
MUST have the e-mailed version 5 days earlier for this
summary to count.
- DAY OF PRESENTATION: be in class and present.
- NOTE WELL: while the oral presentation is a group
project, the summaries are not. No two summaries should have
any identical traits that arise from two or more people
working on the same summary.
Final:
The Final is provisionally planned to have some or all of the
following:
- Factual matters: these are things like the birth and death
dates of Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates, the titles of the works
of Aristotle, etc. In other words, these are things that have
right and wrong answers that you either know or you do not know
and cannot be argued about.
- Short answer ID's: a few sentences about a concept.
- Text ID's: a passage from Aristotle for you to discuss:
identifying and discussing the key Aristotelian claims and how
they relate to Aristotelianism generally
Length: 1.5 hours for the very well prepared student.
The final is not set in cement: it may change considerably.
Grades: 91-100%=A, 81-90%=B,
71-80%=C, 61-70%=D, 60% or lower fails. Plus and minus will be given
for the top three and bottom three points of each range
respectively.
Graded Elements of this Course
Final
|
20%
|
Argument Analyses (top ten
grades count)
|
60%
|
Article Summary
|
15%
|
Article Presentation
|
5%
|
Daily Comments
|
1-2 comments missed = 0%
deduction from final grade
3rd comment missed = 2% deduction from final grade
4th comment missed = 2.5% deduction from final grade
5th comment missed = 3% deduction from final grade
... etc. |
Attendance: see daily comments policy. Also, argument
analyses will only be accepted on the date due: no late papers will
be accepted.
Obvious exceptions: hospitalization/illness due to factors beyond
your control (i.e. not caused by your own poor choices), immediate
family members' death (typically, two days of travel and one day
being there, so at most 2 classes), etc.
Athletes (and those with legitimate reasons for missing classes
or religious concerns that do not fit the UVM academic calendar)
and ACCESS students: please let me know as soon as possible if
your schedule requires accommodations for this class.
After-the-fact requests for accommodations will not be made.
This course fulfills
the following requirements: AH2: Humanities
The humanities involve
the study of past and present human thought about the way the
world works and how people should behave, exploring big
questions with which human cultures have grappled for centuries. The study of the
humanities helps students to understand what it means to be
human and how the past has shaped the present, building skills
in using primary source evidence to construct rational
arguments, and expanding capacity to empathize with other
people.
Human Concern For You and Your Fellow
Students:
College is often a high-stress, confusing, and even dangerous
experience. Not just college. Life is. If you see someone whom you
suspect is in a place where help is needed, don't hesitate to let
me know. I can and will find someone who can try to help them in a
constructive, non-punitive, non-blaming way. Myself, I am just not
equipped to help in most cases, but I know folks who are and I
know how to get help where it is needed. I am talking about things
like depression, suicide, violence, self-destructive behavior,
drugs, alcohol, abuse, crime, assault, etc. While I have no
interest in and you probably should not tell me about
irresponsible escapades, I do want to know if there is a need for
help. Don't regret not saying something afterwards. Also, you
should know that I and all your professors are mandatory
reporters.
This Class and Your Future
Literature, philosophy, history, and human thought in general
should play a strong role in the rest of your life, and your time
in college should plant seeds that grow into lifelong interests
and passions.
Occasionally, students also want to know about jobs, careers, and
such. I'm an academic, and I believe that a class like mine should
never stoop to usefulness: there are much, much more important and
lofty goals, having to do with meaningfulness, truth, beauty,
progress, figuring things out, human fulfilment, wonder at our
world, etc. And yet, I am told that the skills one gains in the
humanities are essential and important in the workplace, so much
so that you are as likely to be successful in a career with a
liberal arts background as others, more likely in many ways. I
urge you to go to the Career Center and avail yourselves
of their resources. They won't do it for you, but they will
support you, coach you, point out opportunities, and help you as
much as they can to successfully navigate the passage from your
sojourn in the groves of academe to the land of salaries and
billable hours.
UVM POLICIES
UVM has several policies that apply to us, including Our
Common Ground, a code
of academic conduct.
Abide by them.
If any of us do not, steps will be taken to
bring us back into line.
From a UVM alumnus:
Education is not preparation for life; education is life
itself.
(John Dewey, UVM 1879)