Poetics
The work called Poetics
covers, in the main, tragedy, and has something to say about epic as
well. Aristotle's writing on comedy is lost (the novel The Name of the Rose involves
discovery of a manuscript of it: I recommend that book: the movie
isn't bad either).
The enterprise that Aristotle was engaged in includes a good deal of
literary theory and criticism, but it is not primarily trying to be
literary criticism. Aristotle is not trying to produce a theory of
poetry, or of tragedy, that will hold good for all time. He is
trying to tell a Greek audience how to produce a Greek play in the
tragic tradition. This is important, because many people read it to
find Aristotle's literary theory: that is not an easy task.
The Poetics includes
introductory remarks on the nature of poetry and imitation as well
as its history. Then the main body of the work is about
tragedy. A quick discussion of epic follows. Then Aristotle compares
the two and raises some literary-critical questions.
Aristotle says that poetry is imitative. It imitates in words. So
what is imitation?
Plato: narration versus drama.
Counterfeit versus mimic
Making a likeness
Representing
Recreating
Fiction
Token versus type (representing this picnic versus
representing a picnic).
Imagine something, then describe it...
FYI: Merriam-Webster's Third New International Dictionary definition
of "imitate":
- an assumption of or mimicking of the form of something that
serves or is regarded as a model "imitation is the sincerest
form of flattery" "the imitation of leaves by certain
butterflies is unbelievably perfect" "a style developed in
imitation of classic models"
- something that is made or produced as a copy : an artificial
likeness : COUNTERFEIT "risible imitations of his schoolfellows"
"a convincing imitation of colonial architecture"
- a : a literary work or
composition designed to reproduce the style or manner of another
author b : a free
translation or an adaptation or parody especially when involving
transformation of cultural, social, or temporal situation
- the repetition in a voice part of the melodic theme, phrase,
or motive previously found in another part
- a in
Platonism : the process through which a sensible
object is informed by or participates in a subsistent idea or
transcendent archetype b
in Aristotelianism (1) : the artistic simulation of
anything as it is actually (2) : its representation as it is
ideally or as it ought to be
- a : the execution of
an act supposedly as a direct response to the perception of
another person performing the act b : the assumption of the
modes of behavior observed in other individuals
It is not clear what Aristotle means by imitation (the definition
from the dictionary given above of Aristotelian imitation is hard to
swallow: can you imitate Oedipus? how is he "actually"?). It is
clear that it is closest to representation, but it is also clear
that it is closer to fiction than non-fiction.
Aristotle says we are natural imitators and that we take pleasure in
it.
- everyone enjoys imitation. A sign of that is what happens in
actual cases; for we enjoy looking at very accurate likenesses
of things which in themselves are painful to see--for example,
the forms of the foulest animals, and corpses. The reason for
this is that learning is most pleasant not only to philosophers
but also to other humas, even if they share the pleasure
briefly. That is why we enjoy seeing likenesses--as we look, we
learn and infer what each thing is..
- First, the instinct of imitation is implanted in man
from childhood, one difference between him and other animals
being that he is the most imitative of living creatures,
and through imitation learns his earliest lessons; and no
less universal is the pleasure felt in things imitated. We
have evidence of this in the facts of experience. Objects
which in themselves we view with pain, we delight to
contemplate when reproduced with minute fidelity
[Poetics Chapter lV]
Perhaps what Aristotle means is that poetry represents something
that is universal about life by means of presenting actions that
involve both necessary and probable components.
- What it re-presents: Our character is the traits we were
caused to have or acquired voluntarily. Our actions show our
character and determine whether we will be happy. Literature
shows actions at crucial moments via plot. Tragedy should
show complex actions leading the hero to a reversal of fortune
because of a mistake. Pity and fear are excited by that.
- the historian, however, by contrast with the poet, describes
what has happened, whereas the poet describes the sort of things
that would happen. This is why poetry is more philosophical and
more serious than history; for it speaks more of what is
universal, whereas history speaks of what is particular.
Tragedy
Aristotle wrote about tragedy as he knew it, and it is unfair
to expect him to write about tragedy as we know it, drama as we know
it, or poetry in general as we know it, for art, more than many
things, is a matter of convention. He was reacting to the phenomena
he observed.
Aristotle's definition of tragedy:
- A tragedy is the imitation of an action which is serious and,
having grandeur, complete in itself, done in language seasoned
with embellishments, each appearing separately in different
parts of the work, in dramatic rather than narrative form,
accomplishing by way of pity and fear the catharsis of such
feelings. 1449b22-28
action:
serious:
complete:
language:
embellishments (separately appearing):
parts: plot, character, diction, thought, spectacle (special
effects), and music/song. What of dance?
dramatic:
catharsis: purification or purgation (of what?)
pity and fear: for whom? for what? does it fit Aristotle's def. of
pity in the Rhetoric? the
pity and fear cause pleasure
(so they are not really pity and fear?) 1453b12? pity and fear
specifically or just emotions like them? quasi-emotions?
Did Shakespeare write tragedy? the answer must be no, if we follow
A's definition. Neither did O'Neill or Ibsen, who are also among the
supposedly greatest tragedians.
The tragic hero:
- There remains, then, the intermediate kind of person, a man
not preeminently virtuous or just, but who enjoys a high
reputation and prosperity, whose misfortune is brought upon him
not by vice and depravity but by some fault. 1453a6-10
This "fault" is famous: it is a translation of the Greek word hamartia, which means 'fault'
but also means a mistake: it is the "action" of tragedy: the
misfortune which follows is undeserved, so it's not a sin.
Does tragedy then arouse the feeling we have when we observe bad
luck?
Unity:
Classic modern drama obeys the supposed unities of drama: action,
time, and place. The unity of action is the one that Aristotle
explicitly asks for.
A complete action has a beginning, middle, and an end: good plots
resemble living organisms.
- tragedy is an imitation not of people but of action and of
life...In a play, then, people do not act in order to portray
character: they include character for the sake of action.
1450a16-21
Plot elements:
- anagnorisis: recognition (Oedipus recognizes that he
has killed his father and slept with his mother)
- peripateia: reversal of fortune (Oedipus goes from king
to blind exile)
Pity:
W3 definitions:
- archaic: MERCY,
CLEMENCY "saw that his judge was inclining to mercy, and he
renewed his appeals for pity" J.H.Shorthouse
- a (1) : sympathetic
heartfelt sorrow for one that is suffering physically or
mentally or that is otherwise distressed or unhappy (as through
misfortune, difficulties) : COMPASSION, COMMISERATION "felt the
deepest pity for the prisoners" (2) : the capacity to feel such sorrow "was
habitually hardhearted and without pity" b : a somewhat disdainful or
contemptuous feeling of regret over the condition of one viewed
by the speaker as in some way inferior or reprehensible "leaves
us less with a sense of repugnance ... than with a sense of pity
for the man who could think of nothing better" T.S.Eliot
- a cause of regret : a condition or circumstance that is to be
regretted "what a pity that you didn't get here sooner"