On the Universe 401b8-24

I think that God and nothing else is meant when we speak of Necessity, since he is as it were an invincible cause; and Fate, because his action is continuous and he cannot be stayed in his course; and Destiny, because all things have their bounds, and nothing which exists is infinite; and Lot, from the fact that all things are allotted; and Nemesis, from the apportionment which is made to every individual; and Adrasteia, which is a cause ordained by nature which cannot be escaptes; and Dispensation, so called because it exists for ever. What is said of the Fates and their spindle tends to the same conclusion, for they are three, appointed over different periods of time, and the thread on the spindle is part of it already spend, part reserved for the future, and part in the course of being spun. One of the Fates is appointed to deal with the past, namely Atropos, for nothing that is gone by can be changed; Lachesis is concerned with the future, for cessation in the course of nature awaits all things; Clotho presided over the present, accomplishing and spinning for each their own particular destiny. The fable is well and duly composed. All these things are nought else but God.

Notes:
 On the Universe was not written by Aristotle. It is called a 'spurious' work of Aristotle, by which is meant that it is handed down to us in the Aristotelian corpus and we have no other author to attribute it to, but we have good reasons to believe it was not actually written by Aristotle.
Also, looking up the etymology of the names in this passage will help understand the claims made here (Atropos, for example, means 'not turning' or 'un-changing'). Etymology was a very unscientific thing in antiquity.