Details and Metadata
Printer-friendly version View XML version Download Ecological Metadata Language file
Methods
The methods followed in the creation of the dataset, including description of field, laboratory and processing steps, and quality control procedures
Current Methods
Core collection and processing
At each study site two xylem increment cores were collected at ~180ยบ from 4-20 co-dominant trees present within a ~15-30m radius of plot center. Cores were dried, mounted and sanded, according to standard procedures, measured, and visually cross dated using the list method. This data was used to create the BAI. Annual vegetation indices were compared with the BAI using Landsat technology.
Dataset Fields
Detailed documentation of the fields comprising the dataset, including the type of measurement, units where applicable, and any controlled vocabularies or code lists present in the data
Field Name Caption Description Additional Information 1970 1970 1970
Ratio Units: 1971 1971 1971
Ratio Units: 1972 1972 1972
Ratio Units: 1973 1973 1973
Ratio Units: 1974 1974 1974
Ratio Units: 1975 1975 1975
Ratio Units: 1976 1976 1976
Ratio Units: 1977 1977 1977
Ratio Units: 1978 1978 1978
Ratio Units: 1979 1979 1979
Ratio Units: 1980 1980 1980
Ratio Units: 1981 1981 1981
Ratio Units: 1982 1982 1982
Ratio Units: 1983 1983 1983
Ratio Units: 1984 1984 1984
Ratio Units: 1985 1985 1985
Ratio Units: 1986 1986 1986
Ratio Units: 1987 1987 1987
Ratio Units: 1988 1988 1988
Ratio Units: 1989 1989 1989
Ratio Units: 1990 1990 1990
Ratio Units: 1991 1991 1991
Ratio Units: 1992 1992 1992
Ratio Units: 1993 1993 1993
Ratio Units: 1994 1994 1994
Ratio Units: 1995 1995 1995
Ratio Units: 1996 1996 1996
Ratio Units: 1997 1997 1997
Ratio Units: 1998 1998 1998
Ratio Units: 1999 1999 1999
Ratio Units: 2000 2000 2000
Ratio Units: 2001 2001 2001
Ratio Units: 2002 2002 2002
Ratio Units: 2003 2003 2003
Ratio Units: 2004 2004 2004
Ratio Units: 2005 2005 2005
Ratio Units: 2006 2006 2006
Ratio Units: 2007 2007 2007
Ratio Units: 2008 2008 2008
Ratio Units: 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010
Ratio Units: Basal Area Basal Area Basal Area
Ratio Units: Collector Collector Collector
Nominal Site ID Site ID Site ID
Nominal Species Species Species
Nominal Tree ID Tree ID Tree ID
Nominal Sampling Equipment
Equipment and software used to collect data, including how that equipment was used.
Current Equipment
Imagery from sensor
Imagery from the Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) sensor
Software
J2X software
Velmex sliding stage
Velmex sliding stage
Site Characteristics
The spatial extent of the dataset site coverage, and descriptions of the spatial extent and context for the data collection
- Site Description
In order to capture forest growth rates across a range of species, decline condition and land use histories, we used data from 47 plots throughout northern Vermont and New Hampshire. Falling across a broad elevational gradient (96 m-1155 m above sea level), plots were dominated by red spruce (Picea rubens), balsam fir (Abies balsamea), paper birch (Betula papyrifera), yellow birch (Betula alleghensis), red maple (Acer rubrum), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), American beech (Fagus grandifolia),