Wild Brook Trout Monitoring in the West Branch of the Little River and Ranch Brook
The brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis is native to Vermont and widely distributed in cold-water streams throughout the state. These populations are often considered an indication of healthy ecosystems due to their stringent water quality and habitat requirements. In addition to their ecological value, brook trout are a favorite among Vermont anglers.
The Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife has monitored wild brook trout populations in the West Branch of the Little River and Ranch Brook since 1997. While this evaluation initially focused on the potential effects of ski area development and snowmaking water withdrawals on brook trout populations, these data also provide valuable insights into the effects of broader environmental variables over the long term.
Trout population surveys were conducted annually from 1997 through 2017 at three stations on the West Branch and two stations on Ranch Brook. Trout population surveys consisted of multiple run sampling with a 500-volt DC streamside electrofisher. Survey sections were generally 250 ft. in length and were conducted during the summer months (July-early August) when stream flow had subsided and brook trout young-of-year (YOY) became large enough to effectively sample.
Trout captured during stream surveys were measured to the nearest millimeter and weighed to the nearest gram. Population estimates within each sampling station were based upon the removal method and determined by the maximum weighted likelihood method developed by Carle and Strub (1978). Population estimates were calculated for each of two age classes, YOY as one and yearling (1) and older fish (1++) combined as the other, distinguished by length distribution. The population estimates were standardized to represent number per mile (#/mi) for each age class and summed for the total brook trout population within each station (Table 6).
2017 in Summary
In 2017, natural reproduction of brook trout decreased at the two Ranch Brook stations and two of the three West Branch stations relative to 2016 populations but remained above 2014 estimates despite this decline. At the upper West Branch station, reproduction increased to numbers comparable to 2015, however the YOY counted per mile at the lowest West Branch station was the lowest observed since 2000. Overall reproduction was down nearly 38% from 2016. (Figure 20). Yearling and older brook trout increased by 17% at the Ranch 960’ station but decreased by an average of 21% at the remaining 4 sites in 2017 (Figure 21). Population estimates for both YOY and yearling and older brook trout remained within the range observed over the 20 years of study.
Long Term Trends
West Branch and Ranch Brook supported high quality brook trout populations maintained through natural reproduction. These populations consist of multiple age classes and average over 1700 trout per mile over the 21-year study. Wild brook trout populations vary considerably among and within streams due to differences in habitat conditions and localized land use effects while broad environmental variables may have significant temporal effects. While large fluctuations were observed for each age class both within and among the two study streams, no clear trends were evident.
Annual brook trout YOY production showed clear highs and lows, often consistent across the five stations and two study streams, suggesting the effect of broad environmental influences. Successful recruitment of YOY requires suitable habitat conditions over an extended period of time including fall spawning, overwinter incubation and spring emergence. In some years peak YOY production was followed by commensurate increases in the yearling and older population such as observed in 1999-2000 and 2012-2013. Yearling and older brook trout populations tend to be more stable and are able to quickly recover following extreme events. For example, very high flow events in the summer of 2010 and spring 2011 may have contributed to the yearling and older brook trout declines observed in some stations but these populations rebounded to above average levels by 2013.
Global climate change predictions suggest a continued loss of brook trout populations throughout their range due to increases in stream temperature and flood frequency. Forested watersheds and riparian areas will be critical for the long-term persistence of Vermont’s wild brook trout populations as they serve to moderate water temperatures and streamflow, filter and retain sediments and nutrients, contribute and retain large wood and organic matter, stabilize streambanks and floodplains and provide for complex and diverse aquatic habitats. Improving aquatic passage through the elimination of constructed barriers (e.g. culverts, weirs and dams) will also help ensure brook trout are able to access critical habitats and recover from extreme natural events which reduce population levels.
The increases in flood frequency and stream temperatures predicted under climate change do not bode well for brook trout populations.
- Carle, F.L. and Strub, M.R., 1978. A new method for estimating population size from removal data. Biometrics, pp.621-630.
FEMC Project Database Link
- Wild Brook Trout Monitoring in the West Branch of the Little River and Ranch Brook https://www.uvm.edu/femc/data/archive/project/Wild-Brook-Trout-Monitoring-in-the-west-Branch-of-the-little-river-and-ranch-brook