University of Vermont

Gund Institute for Ecological Economics

Surprisingly Few ‘Busy Bees’ Make Global Crops Grow

Wild bees valued in the billions, roughly equal to honeybees

wild bees, carpenter bees, native pollinators
With surprisingly few bee species pollinating the world's crops, we must protect bees from further declines, researchers say. (Photo: Sam Droege, USGS)

A major international study finds that surprisingly few bee species are responsible for pollinating the world’s crops.

The paper, published in Nature Communications, suggests that only two percent of wild bee species pollinate 80 percent of bee-pollinated crops worldwide. The study is one of the largest on bee pollination to date.

While agricultural development and pesticides have been shown to produce sharp declines in many wild bee populations, the study shows these “busy bees” can remain abundant in agricultural landscapes.

The study gives a powerful economic rationale for conserving wild bees. It calculates the value of wild bee pollination to the global food system at $3,000 per hectare of insect-pollinated agricultural land – an amount in the billions globally, and roughly equal to the value of honey bees.

But the findings also offer a warning to conservation advocates hoping that economic arguments can justify the preservation of all species. Moral reasons are still needed, researchers say.

“This study shows us that wild bees provide enormous economic benefits, but reaffirms that the justification for protecting species cannot always be economic,” says Taylor Ricketts of the University of Vermont’s Gund Institute For Ecological Economics, a study co-author. “We still have to agree that protecting biodiversity is the right thing to do.” 

Background

Fifty-eight researchers worldwide conducted the three-year study, led by Professor David Kleijn of the Netherlands’ Wageningen University.

The study advances our understanding of wild bees’ crucial role in the global food system. About two-thirds of the world’s most important crops benefit from bee pollination, including coffee, cacao and many fruits and vegetables. 

Wild pollination is increasingly important with the growing instability of honey bee colonies. Honey bees are no longer considered wild in many regions due to their intense management.

The most important wild bees for agriculture include some of the world’s most common species, including the common eastern bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) in the U.S. and the red-tailed bumblebee (Bombus lapidarius) in Europe, researchers say.

One reason to preserve bee biodiversity is securing the future resiliency of global pollination systems, Ricketts says. Previous studies associate biodiversity with more stable pollination services over time.

“Species and populations can fluctuate significantly as landscapes and climates change,” says Ricketts, who is also a professor in UVM’s Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources. “So protecting a wide variety of our wild bees is crucial.”

The paper outlines bee-friendly practices for farmers, including maintaining wildflowers and grass strips, organic farming techniques, and limiting – or delaying – the use of pesticides and other chemicals. 

Global collaboration

The study includes 90 individual studies of nearly 1,400 crop fields across five continents (North America, Europe, Asia, Africa and South America).

Regular monitoring found nearly 74,000 individual bees from nearly 785 wild bees species on crops. Of 20,000 known bee species, roughly two percent pollinated 80 per cent of crops.

“Rare and threatened species may play a less significant role economically than common species, but this does not mean their protection is less important,” says Kleijn.

Ecosystem services

The economic benefits to people from nature – such as crop pollination, water purification, and carbon storage – are increasingly known as ecosystem services. The fact that nature provides these services has increasingly been used as a reason to protect the environment and its biodiversity.

Read the study: Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Doi:10.1038/ncomms8414.