Sarah DesLauriers'
Portfolio
Christina: CLP Child
During my 3rd year of the Elementary Education program I worked in a school with a young girl who I have named Christina.  Christina was a sweet young 1st grader who is a reading recovery student.  She likes to be right and will very rarely go off and write on her own without asking for help for any word that she doesn't know for sure.  I followed her learning throughout the semester and wrote a lesson based on what I learned.  By assessing her in so many ways and then choosing an aspect of her learning that should be expanded upon I have shown that I can effectively understand student learning and modify instruction (VT2)
       Christina  is what I would consider a child moving into being a transitional speller.  She understands many things about spelling and can here the intial and last consenant sounds.  She also understand that vowels need to be in the words.  She is a strong speller and understands a lot about sounds.  She understands the 'ing' sound as proven in her correct spelling as well as her word "soming" which is swimming.  She knows a lot of the chunks in spelling as well as how to decode words and spell them.  However, I would almost think that she might be in the phonemic stage as well.  I think this because of her words, "gagon"(dragon) and "gress"(dress).  These words show that she's not able to hear the first sounds correctly or employ them.
 Some of the things that I noticed as far as her misspellings go she has troubles with 'e's that sound a little like 'a's in words such as, "mel"(mail) and "diere"(diary) and "dieres"(diaries).  She also has troubles with silent letters, which is shown in "secris"(secrets) and "wen"(when).  She is also missing some of her c, k, or ck words.  This is shown in her words "pecde"(peeked), "stik"(stick), "singk"(sink).
       Christina is a transitional speller.  In the Temple et all reading iIt says that "Words spelled by transitional spelling look like English words, though they are not spelled correctly.  Transitional spellings employ many of the features of standard spelling - the silent letters for markers, scribal rules, and the rest - but employ them uncertainly."  Christina seems to have a strong hold on her spelling, but she is not in the last stage of spellings.  She still needs to see more writing and other words.  Reading will also help.  I believe that besides the spelling test I gave her, the results may be skewed.  Christina is a girl who enjoys to getting help, so her spelling may not show her true understanding of spelling.
This is a journal entry I wrote after looking at writing samples from Christina as well as giving her a short spelling test (using words she had not seen before) to determine how she spells words that she doesn't know.  I found that most of her spelling errors were around vowel digraphs and vowel and consonant blends.
For the Running Record I used two different books with Christina.  The first one was really easy and so I switched to a different book.  The two books I used were "Scat," said the Cat by Joy Cowley and Walk, Ride, Run by Jenny Giles. 
 I pulled out the second book (Walk, Ride, Run) and asked her to read from that one.  She had 12 errors in this book.  Of her 12 errors, two of them were appeals.  She turned to me and actually asked me what the word says.  8 of her errors was the same error.  One of the main character's names was Emma and she said Emily every time.  The other two errors she made were substitutions.  I felt that for one of them, she only used visual communications and the other she used all three.  The first substitution she made, besides the Emily/Emma thing, was dikes for bikes.  I said that she only used the visual because dikes isn't a word nor does it make sense in the sentence.  However, I have noticed that many of the 1st graders in the class mix up the letters b and d, so that may be a part of that error.  The other error was in the sentence, "Yay,  I win!"  She read "Yay, I won".  The sentence made sense the way it was read and the syntax was good and it is visually good.
 Christina is using all the information available to her to help her read most of the time.  I would hope that she would try some words before appealing instead of looking at them and then asking for help.
  Running records are important tools to help you find where a student is in text level as well as how a child uses the information given to them to figure out a word. It might be visual or spatial clues that help a child, but with a running record you can be sure.  I did this running record as a part of my junior block in literacy.

 
LESSON ASSESSMENT
Christina was the student that I was watching the most.  During her word sort she found the pattern and sorted them the way she should.  I didn’t tell the students what the patterns were and had them figure out what the two patterns were on their own.  After Christina completed the job I asked her what the patterns were, she answered me correctly. I picked out a couple of the words from each column and asked her if the patterns made the same sound.  She insisted that the “ee” words and the “ea” words made different sounds, even though I made sure that only long “e” sounds were represented.  When Garrett disagreed and told me the right answer, Christina changed her mind, but when I asked the question again at the end of the lesson she gave me her original answer.
T -  “Christina, what is your pattern?”
C - “These words have 1 ‘e’ and these words have 2 ‘e’s
T – “Good.  What sound does the “ee” words make?”
C – “E”
T – “Does the “ea” words make the same sound?”
C – “No.”
T – “What sound does it make?
C – “e-ah.”
I don’t think that Christina or the other students really got out of this lesson what I would have wanted them too. To really help this child I would definitely consider working with her more and doing more word sort, possibly alone.  She seemed to really follow Garrett and was not actually able to explain anything on her own.  Doing a variety of different activities on different hard sounds would help her as I notice that the hardest parts for her in spelling seem to be mixing up sounds that are spelled differently, but sound the same.  Such as the hard “e” sound or the C, K, or CK words. 
I would say that Christina is a Transtitional word study student.  I know this because it seems that she hears most sounds and can write many letter combinations easily.  She just doesn’t always know which ones to use and where.  She also seems to notice simple patterns and knows that they will make the same sounds.  Such as the fact that while she didn’t know what sound the “ea” made, she did understand that they all the made the same sound because they were a pattern. 
Using these assessments I felt that moving towards work with vowel digraphs would be a good move, since that was one area that I had noticed that she needed help with.  This is the assessment I wrote after a lesson on word sorting and the word patterns "ee" and "ea".  This lesson showed that I could write a lesson was was assessment informed (PC2a4)
During the lesson I was surprised to see my CLP student not being able to explain things for herself.  When she doesn’t usually know things she at least tries for the most part, but she didn’t do that this time.  I think that for things like this, Christina seems to work better alone.  If I were to redo this lesson, I would like to focus more on Christina and what she had to say. As well as do whole class lessons on the subject to solidify the knowledge that she would be gaining with the extra work.
 In the future I would be able to assess Christina better if I had more time to work on projects like these so that I could get a better view of whether or not she really understands what I’m trying to do as well as it would give a broader range of her word level knowledge.
| Table of Contents | Introductory Essay | The Script | The Set | The Actors | The Director |
| The Big Performance | Closing Statement| State Criteria | Program Criteria | Resume | Welcome |