Sustainable Forest Management
1. Bihun,Y, 2004. “Implementing Reduced-Impact Logging (RIL) to Advance Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) in the Ukrainian Carpathians.” From the Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference: Forest Engineering: New Techniques, Technologies and the Environment, October 5-10, 2004, Lviv Ukraine. Ukrainian State University of Forestry and Wood Technology, Technical Bulletin. Vol. 14.4: 238-247.
2. Bihun,Y, 2004. “Principles of Sustainable Forest Management in the Framework of Regional Economic Development.” From the Proceedings of the Fulbright Ukraine Conference on May 20-24, 2004, Skolje, Ukraine. In Publication. 12 pp.
3. Buksha, I. Forestry Sector of Ukraine in Transition to Market Economy. Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Agroforestry. www.unece.org/trade/timber/h3/Warsaw%20doc
4. Elbakidze, M. and Angelstam, P. Empirical evaluation of forest policy cycle development in actual landscapes: observations from Ukrainian and Russian cases. // 13th IBFRA Conference “New Challenges in Management of Boreal Forests”, Umea, Sweden – https://arbetsplats.sfak.slu.se/faculty_doc/Delade%20dokument/IBFRA/Presentations/
model_forest/SFM_Ukraine_Russia.pdf
5. Franklin, J.F., T.A. Spies, R. Van Pelt, A. Carey, D. Thornburgh, D.R. Berg, D. Lindenmayer, M. Harmon, W.S. Keeton, D.C. Shaw, K. Bible, and J. Chen. 2002. Disturbances and the structural development of natural forest ecosystems with some implications for silviculture. Forest Ecology and Management 155:399-423.
6. Keeton, W.S. 2006. Managing for late-successional/old-growth characteristics in northern hardwood-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management 235: 129-142.
7. Keeton, W.S. 2007. Role of Managed Forestlands and Models for Sustainable Forest Management: Perspectives from North America. George Wright Forum (in review).
8. Keeton, W.S, J.F. Franklin, and P.W. Mote. 2007a. Climate variability, climate change, and western wildfire with implications for the suburban-wildland interface. Pages 229-257 in: A. Troy and R. Kennedy (eds.). Living on the Edge: Economic, Institutional and Management Perspectives on Wildfire Hazard in the Urban Interface. Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources, Vol 6. Elsevier Sciences, New York, NY.
9. Keeton, W.S., C.E. Kraft, and D.R. Warren. 2007b. Mature and old-growth riparian forests: structure, dynamics, and effects on Adirondack stream habitats. Ecological Applications 17: 852-868.
10. Nijnik, M. 2002. To sustainability in forestry: The Ukraine’s case [electronic version]. Wageningen: Wageningen University. Retrieved October 10, 2006 http://library.wur.nl/wda/dissertations/dis3244.pdf
11. Maksymiv, L., Soloviy, I. & Zahvoyska, L. 2004. SFM in Ukraine: Reality and Perspectives. International Conference on Economics of Sustainable Development. www.forestry.utoronto.ca/socio-economic/icesfm/
12. Polyakov, M. O. 1999. Valuation of Forest in Ukraine. Royal Institute of Technology. Retrieved 10/9/06. http://web6.duc.auburn.edu/~polyama/msc/thes.pdf
13. Soloviy, I. P. 2000. Afforestation in Ukraine: Potential and Restrictions. European Forest Institute Series. N 35.
14. Soloviy, I.P. 2006. Forest Policy towards SFM: Problems of International Agreements Implementation at National and Local Levels. // 13th IBFRA Conference “New Challenges in Management of Boreal Forests”, Umea, Sweden- https://arbetsplats.sfak.slu.se/faculty_doc/Delade%20dokument/IBFRA/Presentations/
model_forest/FOREST_POLICY_TOWARDS_SFM_Soloviy_Ukraine.pdf
15. Synyakevych, I., Soloviy, I. 2002. Modern forest policy in changing societies. – Scientific Papers of Agricultural University of Poznan. Forestry Vol.5, 87-95. Pp 87-95
16. Synyakevych I, Soloviy I. Institutional Preconditions for the Ukrainian Forest Policy Development. // Forests in Transition II. Challenges in Strengthening of Capacities for Forest Policy Development in Countries with Economies in Transition. Edited by Libor Jansky, Radovan Nevenic, Ilpo Tikkanen, Brita Pajari. – Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University, 2004. – P. 363-375

Ecological Economics
17. Angelstam, P. 2006. Maintaining cultural and natural biodiversity in
Europe’s economic centre and periphery. In: Agnoletti, M. (Ed.), The
Conservation of cultural landscapes. CAB International, 125-143.
18. Bartczak, A. Forest non-market valuation studies in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland: a Review. http://www.medforex.net/e45/2.Catania/Bartczak.pdf
19. Costanza, R., 2004. Social Goals and Valuation of Ecosystem Services
a. Ecosystems Journal. February 19,
20. Daly, H. E. & Farley, J. 2004. Ecological economics: Principles and applications. Washington, DC: Island Press.
21. Melichar, J., Scasny, M. Introduction to Non-Market Valuation Methods and Critical Review of Their Application in the Czech Republic
a. http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/storage/sylab/127_ii-02melichar.pdf
22. Vrublevska, O. Do liberal market reforms provide sustainable use of the nature capital fund in the Ukrainian Carpathians? – European Association for Comparative Economics Studies (EACES) 9th Bi-Annual Conference: Development Strategies – A Comparative View. – http://www.bton.ac.uk/bbs/eaces/papers/1e2.pdf
23. Zahvoyska, L. Implementation of Sustainable Development Paradigm into Ukrainian University Education -http://www.hesd.si/HESD_Day2/Zahvoyska.pdf
24. Workshop on “Economic Valuation of Recreation Functions of Forest Ecosystems” http://www.cuni.cz/COZPENG-75.html