Sponsored Project Administration - SPA
- NSF Research Policy on Misconduct
- 42 CFR Part 93 PHS Policy on Research Misconduct
- NIH Objectivity in Research Final Rule
- Federal Policy on Misconduct
- NIH ORI - RCR Resources - Research Misconduct
UVM Policy & Guidelines
For more information, please see UVM's Alleged Misconduct in Research and Other Scholarly Activities Policy.
Public concern about misconduct in research first surfaced in the early 1980’s following reports of cases of egregious misbehavior. One researcher republished under his own name dozens of articles previously published by others. Other researchers in one way or another falsified or fabricated research results. To make matters worse, it seemed as if research institutions sometimes ignored or deliberately covered up problems rather than investigate them. Eventually Congress stepped in and required Federal agencies and research institutions to develop research misconduct policies.
Research misconduct policies provide guidance on responsible conduct in three areas. They:
- establish definitions for misconduct in research
- outline procedures for reporting and investigating misconduct, and
- provide protection for whistleblowers (persons who report misconduct) and persons accused of misconduct
Together, the definitions of and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in research form an initial foundation for effective self-regulation in research.
Although Federal policies technically apply only to federally funded research, many research institutions apply Federal research misconduct policies to all research. Many research institutions have also broadened the basic Federal definitions to include other inappropriate practices. In combination, Federal and institutional research misconduct policies define research practices that researchers must avoid. Failure to do so can result in the termination of employment or ineligibility to receive Federal funding.
Last modified June 08 2011 01:55 PM