Transition
Transition actions intentionally accommodate ecosystem change, rather than resist it. These actions work to move forests toward conditions that are expected to be better adapted to future conditions. These alterations vary across a continuum from slight changes in species composition and structure in response to expected change (e.g., anticipatory adaptation) to full-fledged transformation to novel communities. Transition approaches are likely unnecessary in ecosystems that are not highly vulnerable, and it may take extreme effort to "push" these systems toward future conditions. Ecosystems that are highly vulnerable, especially those that have reduced adaptive capacity (e.g., degraded sites) or have undergone severe disturbance may be the most suitable locations to explore transition strategies. Because transition actions are often inherently experimental and outside "business as usual", monitoring and evaluation activities take on even greater importance.p>
It is important to consider site-level vulnerability when deciding whether to pursue this pathway:
Forests with low vulnerability currently have less exposure to climate change pressures, and these systems may be well-established and difficult to change. Transition actions may be unnecessary, difficult, and ineffective in ecosystems that have low vulnerability to climate change.
Forests with moderate vulnerability may be experiencing impacts from climate change or other stressors. These stressors may create challenges for sustaining oak into the future, particularly if pressures increase over time. Transition actions can be used to alter systems toward conditions that may be better adapted to future conditions. In the absence of severe disturbance, transition actions may be unnecessary, difficult, and ineffective in ecosystems that have moderate vulnerability to climate change.
Forests with high vulnerability are often already experiencing impacts from climate change and other stressors, or these impacts may be imminent. Because oak forests are highly adaptable to many disturbances and can tolerate relatively warm and dry conditions, transition actions may be unnecessary and difficult to achieve in many instances. Transition actions may be most appropriate when systems have undergone severe disturbance or are not expected to be able to cope with future conditions.
You may also want to consider what capability you have to transition your forest, and whether a more gradual or more abrupt transition is most in line with your goals and capability. Compare this option with the Resistance and Resilience pathways to determine what option best meets your management goals and objectives
Here are some examples of adaptation actions that can help maintain oak forests to meet objectives for general forest health to provide wood products and other benefits. The specific actions used in a particular location will vary based on local site conditions, management goals, and climate risks. Additional actions are described in the Adaptation Strategies and Approaches for Forests.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some examples of adaptation actions that can help maintain oak forests to meet objectives for wildlife habitat. The specific actions used in a particular location will vary based on local site conditions, management goals, and climate risks. Additional actions are described in the Adaptation Strategies and Approaches for Wildlife (in review).
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some examples of adaptation actions that can help maintain oak forests to meet objectives for water resources. The specific actions used in a particular location will vary based on local site conditions, management goals, and climate risks. Additional actions are described in the Adaptation Strategies and Approaches for Forested Watersheds.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some examples of adaptation actions that can help maintain oak forests to meet objectives related to forest roads and trails used for recreation and other purposes. The specific actions used in a particular location will vary based on local site conditions, management goals, and climate risks. Additional actions are described in the Adaptation Strategies and Approaches for Recreation.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some examples of adaptation actions that can help maintain oak forests to meet objectives for general forest health to provide carbon sequestration and storage, along with other benefits. The specific actions used in a particular location will vary based on local site conditions, management goals, and climate risks. Additional actions are described in the Adaptation Strategies and Approaches for Forest Carbon.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-the-Ground Examples
- Adaptive Silviculture – Southern New England Oak Forests
- The Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change (ASCC) study sites in southern New England include resistance, resilience, transition, and no action treatments in oak forests that are representative of forests across much of the region. The treatments were developed by a team of scientists and managers working to identify options relevant to smaller parcel sizes and varied ownership.
- Providence Water: Planting Future Adapted Forests
- The forests surrounding Providence’s Scituate Reservoir provide clean water to over 600,000 people, or two-thirds of all Rhode Islanders. Challenges to northern hardwood regeneration ultimately threaten water quality. Managers are experimenting with actions that promote a variety of oaks and other species that are expected to be better adapted to future conditions.
- South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority: Maltby Lakes Southern Pine Beetle Response
- Managers conducted a clearcut in this forested watershed in response to a southern pine beetle infestation that threatened to expand northward into other forests. Silvicultural techniques and supplemental planting were used to support the establishment of future-adapted tree species.