There appears to be quite a bit of confusion about the Annotated Bibliography. This post may help with that (and I’ll post it to the course blog for your future reference).
1) The Annotated Bibliography will now be due on Thursday October 26th. That gives you an extra week to get this done, and to get it done well. If you’re done this week, feel free to turn yours in this week. There will be no penalty for taking the extra week. I just want these things to be good.
2) The assignment asks for two different types of works on your bibliography. You need to find and annotate 3 primary works and 5 secondary works. Primary texts are texts that you treat as texts in and of themselves. They can be novels, poems, short stories, travelogues, autobiographies, whatever. Secondary texts are texts that are explicitly about other texts. They comment on, theorize about, or explicate other texts. So, the Trumbo essay is a secondary text because it talks about other texts (or at least about other illustrations). Fun Home is a primary text because even though it includes passages from and references to other literary works, it’s mostly about itself and the story(ies) it’s telling.
The secondary texts you find do not, themselves, need to be multimodal. They only need to be about multimodality and/or illustration/print combinations.
3) If you’ve never had to find your own secondary (i.e., critical and/or theoretical texts), here are my best strategies:
3a) Start running searches through the MLA online bibliography (you can extend this through the other bibliographies — JStor, ERIC, Academic Search, etc.) All of these bibliographies are accessible through the library’s web page. If you’re accessing the library from off-campus, click the “Connect from Off-Campus” link on the left side of the main page, and then choose EZ-Proxy. That will ask you for your UVM NetID and your password. Then you can “Find Articles and More” to get to these bibliographies.
3b) Comb through the works cited pages of the articles I’ve assigned in the class — if it’s important to Kress when he’s writing about multimodality, for instance, it may be relevant to your project.
3c) Browse the subject headings on books at Bailey-Howe — there may be good texts there (or the books there may lead you to even better works).
4) Online articles and multimodal works are fine, as long as they are reputable. Someone’s blog post on MySpace about pictures isn’t going to carry much academic weight. However, there are lots of reputable online journals and any of them would be fine. Likewise, there are lots of multimodal primary works online. Just make sure your online work is worth writing up.
5) If you haven’t read the work you’re including on your bibliography yourself, you’re treading on thin ice. It may be excellent, it may stink. Unless you can go through it with your own eyes, you’ll never know. It’s a risk that I’d advise you not to take.
6) Including more than one essay/article/work from the same person is okay. However, it will make you seem like a 1-trick pony. I’d suggest picking the most important/significant/useful work and briefly mentioning the others in the annotation to that entry.
7) Your secondary sources need to be *about* multimodality, but they do not need to be multimodal.
As always, if you’ve got questions, let me know.