Criteria for evaluating the Content of a document.
 

Criteria	Apprentice	Reporter	Editor	Publisher
Name and e-mail address(s) complete	not included	E-mail address isn't correct	hard to see	included and e-mail address(s) is written correctly and clearly.
Technology history complete	not included	minimal information	Information is not specific enough and incomplete	Specific information about what you know and can do with technology (computers, scanners, digital video...I don't mean mp3 players or cell phones.
Personal Interests included	less than one paragraph	listed but not talked about	Would like to know more about your interests	Good description of interests, hobbies, sports.....a short story or fact included.
Draws readers interest	A new cure for insomnia	Is readable but unmemorable	Most parts are interesting	Reader has a good sense of who the writer is, as if they just had lunch together and chatted
Information is appropriate for audience	Written for a prisoner on death row.	Written for a your boy/girl/ friend	Written for a middle school student.	Written for other college students and their professor
Tells an organized connected story.	Not a story just jumps around with paragraphs and text.	A few parts seem unconnected	Lacks coherency as a document but does give lots of information.	Attractive document that is well organized and visually appealing. Good balance of text and color and use of graphics and drawing tools. Something You'd want to show off to others.