| Criteria |
Apprentice |
Reporter |
Editor |
Publisher |
| Attention to criteria in
providing feedback |
no criteria addressed |
some criteria vaguely
addressed |
a majority of criteria
specifically addressed |
all criteria specifically
addressed |
| Ability to use evidence to
defend your evaluation |
evidence not used to verify
feedback |
little evidence used to address
positive and suggestive comments. |
some evidence is used to defend
your feedback |
lots of specific examples are
used in reference to criteria in providing your feedback |
| Ability to offer constructive
feedback |
feedback is only critical
without suggestions |
suggestions are harshly stated
and/or little constructive feedback is offered. |
feedback is offered with some
suggestions but explanation could be better |
suggestions are thoughtfully
provided with an explanation of your thinking. |
| Ability to receive and use
feedback |
refuses to accept any feedback
and other group members are criticized for their suggestions. |
feedback is occasionally used
but not discussed |
feedback is accepted without
question |
feedback is considered from all,
discussed and where appropriate, used. |
| Ability to work within a group
to mediate responses. |
does not participate in group
process. |
tends to only respond directly
to questions/tends to dominate the group |
tends to be inappropriately
stubborn, but does discuss ideas and beliefs |
invites participation of all
group members, states beliefs but will listen to all points of view and
demonstrate flexibility. |
| Quality, timeliness and quantity
of feedback |
simple statements, little
participation not about topic |
regular participation but no
depth to feedback and responses are too late to help |
regular participation, timely,
and helpful feedback |
frequent participation, helps
all members in a timely fashion with thoughtful feedback. |