CS 125 - Computability and Complexity

banner


I am teaching assistant for CS 125 — Computability and Complexity — fall semester 2019. I took this class in spring of 2015 with Prof Skalka and enjoyed it very much!

Here is a link to Prof Ling’s course page and to Webber’s page for Formal Language.

Office hours for CS 125 are

  • Monday, 8:30 AM - 9:30 AM
  • Tuesday, 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM
  • Wednesday, 11:00 AM - 12:00 noon
  • Wednesday, 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM (Filip Saulean)

or by appointment. My office is E332 Innovation Hall, but office hours will be in E338, the common area immediately outside E332.

Please feel free to email with questions to clayton dot cafiero at (you know the rest)!

Topics - Formal languages and expressiveness. Chomsky hierarchy. Finite automata. Turing completeness and Church’s Thesis. Decidability and tractability. Complexity classes and theory of NP completeness. Prerequisites: CS 064 or MATH 052. Co-requisite: CS 124.

About the image - The image above is a detail from Roman Verostko’s Manchester Illuminated Universal Turing Machine, #23. The work was executed in 1998, and is a 30” by 22” pen-plotted drawing with gold leaf. It resides in the St Vincent Archabbey and College Legacy Collection, in Latrobe, PA. Verostko works in the intersection of visual arts and computer science. For more information, visit his website. Versostko’s work was featured in Art by the Numbers, by Stephen Ornes, Scientific American, August 2018, Vol. 319(2), p. 68(6).



  • Homework #4 Results

    Homework #4 Results and Key

    Mean: 62.8%; standard deviation: 21.9%

    Answer key can be downloaded here.

    PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE write legibly. If one cannot read your work, you will lose points.

    Here are box-and-whiskers plots for the first four homeworks.

    summary

  • Homework #2 Results

    Homework #2 Results and Key

    Mean: 76.1%

    Standard deviation: 17.6%

    Answer key can be downloaded here.

  • Automaton HORROR

    The textbook (Webber) makes a grievous error in each and every drawing of a finite automaton. Were I grading this textbook, I’d be inclined to mark every such diagram as wrong! Arrows indicating transitions should touch states at both ends. They should leave a state and enter a state. The casual graphic treatment given in the textbook is just plain wrong. Some of you have taken this a step further and you have arrows and states floating in empty space with very little to indicate whence each arrow cometh and where it goeth. No, no, a thousand times NO!