Criteria
|
Needs
Work
|
Fair
Work
|
Good
Work
|
Excellent
Work
|
Content
Grade Appropriate
Connection |
Point doesn't really get
across
Not appropriate for grade level addressed
No connection between what is taught in video and a juried unit/activity
|
Some content is presented
OK
Grade level only appropriate for some students in grades addressed
Connection to unit/activity not very clear
|
Most of the content is
pretty well explained
Grade level appropriate for majority of students in grades addressed
Connection to unit/activity could be better
|
Content presented is very
well explained
Appropriate for grade level of all children in the grades addressed
Good alignment between what the teacher wants students to understand
and the video produced in the juried unit/activity.
|
Text
Organization |
No introduction, credits
or use of text when needed
Story doesn't make any sense
|
Some text used to identify
key elements
Needs to flow better from idea to idea
|
Could use text in a few
places to clarify content
In some places it needs better connection from idea to idea
|
Introduction, credits and
use of text when needed to introduce a new concept or indicate time
passed.
Good transitions between ideas that are carefully demonstrated and
explained.
|
| Editing |
No transitions are used
Looks unedited
No effects used at all
|
Too many different kinds
of transitions are used
Too much poor quality footage is included.
No effects used at all.
|
Most transitions are well
done.
Bits of poor quality footage remain
Some effects used but do not add to movie
|
Transitions are consistent
and smoothly connect segments
Poor quality footage is all removed
Some effects are used to improve the quality or mood of your movie
|
| Timing |
Less than 1 minute and
longer than 10
Not saved correctly.
|
1-2 minutes to 7-9 minutes
and not saved correctly for the web.
|
2 -3 minutes or 5 -6
minutes long
Saved as a quicklime movie for the web.
|
3-5 minutes as a completed
quicklime movie for the web.
|
| Quality
of Video |
Video not clear in many
places
Text is hard to read or absent
Video shows unnecessary movement
Lighting is poor.
|
Video has too many unclear
places
Text is mostly difficult to read or absent
Video has too much shaking
Lighting could be better
|
Video is mostly clear.
Text is mostly easy to read
Video does not shake much
Lighting is good
|
Video is clear.
Text is easy to read
Video does not shake (unless you are depicting an earthquake).
Lighting is very good
|
| Audio |
Audio is cut-off and
inconsistent. Students have great difficulty communicating ideas with
poor voice projection. |
The audio is inconsistent in clarity (too loud/too
soft/garbled) at times and insufficiently communicates the main idea.
Students have difficulty communicating ideas due to weak voice
projection and/or lack of preparation.
The background audio overpowers the primary audio.
|
The audio is clear, but
only partially assists in communicating the main idea. Students
communicate ideas with proper voice projection, adequate preparation
and delivery. |
The audio is clear and effectively assists in
communicating the main idea. Students communicate ideas with
enthusiasm, proper voice projection, appropriate language, and clear
delivery.
Background audio is kept in balance and does not
overpower the primary audio.
|
| Ability
to add to portfolio |
You have not added your
portfolio to your website
|
|
|
You have exported your
video
correctly and added it to your website. It works when played on the web
with machines that have quicklime player installed..
|