|
Home
Up
Biodiversity
Bobcats
Blues
Cormorants
Grassland birds
Bat acoustics
|
|
BIODIVERSITY

Predicting the
effects of land-use change on Vermont's biodiversity.
Principal Investigator: Therese Donovan,
Austin Troy, Alexey Voinov
Cooperators:
 |
Kim Royar, Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife
|
 |
John Austin, Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife
|
Graduate Students:
Post Docs:
Funding Sources:
 |
Northeastern States Research Cooperative (USDA)
|
 |
The Nature Conservancy
|
 |
Jon C. and Catherine Harvey Charitable Foundation
|
 |
Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife
|
Abstract: Land
use change involves the conversion of one land cover type to another, and often
results in the loss and fragmentation of existing wildlife habitat. Although
large areas of contiguous habitat still remain in the
Northern Forest
, increasing development pressures results in the conversion of forests land
types to urban, suburban, or exurban land types. In Vermont, for example, the
rate of land development is ~ 260% greater than the rate of population growth,
where land growth consists primarily of “small urban build up,” i.e., small,
unconnected blocks of land that develop within a matrix of less developed land
– an effective facilitator of habitat fragmentation for many wildlife species.
These
trends indicate that research focused on understanding the impacts of land use
change on the region’s native flora and fauna is much needed.
Because different species are expected to respond to land use and climate
change in different ways, these assessments should target both individual
species and changes in species richness and biological community composition
over time.
In
2003-2004, we
surveyed plants and animals at over 200 sites across Vermont. The dataset
consists of 36,000 bird records, 7,000 amphibian/reptile records, 200 carnivore
records, and several thousand invertebrate records and tree records that were
collected Sites were separated by
≥ 8 km, and consisted of 4 survey stations that were separated by 500
meters. Survey methods were taxon-specific,
with either site or station as the sampling unit of interest (e.g., Maneras et
al. in press, Long et al. 2007 a, b).
Local vegetation was quantified at each station with standard sampling
techniques, and landscape pattern
surrounding each station was characterized with FRAGSTATS® at taxon-specific
buffers, based on 2001 National Landcover. The
data for vertebrates were analyzed as presence-absence on a species-by-species
basis with a single-season
occupancy-modeling framework with local, landscape, and climatic variables
as covariates, which allowed us to generate probability of occurrence maps for
multiple taxa at a 30m2 spatial scale across the entire state of
Vermont. These maps provide the baseline data upon which future land use change
scenarios can be quantitatively assessed.

Publications:
 |
Robert Long's Dissertation
|
 |
Long, R. A., T. M. Donovan, P. MacKay, W.
J. Zielinski, and J. S. Buzas. 2007. Effectiveness of scat
detection dogs for detecting forest carnivores. Journal of Wildlife
Management 71:2007-2017.
|
 |
Long, R. A., T. M. Donovan, P. MacKay, W.
J. Zielinski, and J. S. Buzas. 2007. Comparing scat detection
dogs, cameras, and hair snares for surveying carnivores. Journal of
Wildlife Management 71:2018-2025.
|
 |
Smith, K.W., W. S. Keeton,
T. M. Donovan, and B. Mitchell. 2008.
Stand-level forest structure in avian habitat: scale dependencies in
predicting occurrences in a heterogeneous forest.
Forest
Science 54:36-46.
|
 |
Mitchell, Brian R., and Therese M. Donovan.
Mob mentality: the effect of a mobbing tape on detections
during point count surveys. Open
Ornithology Journal: In
press.
|
 |
More to come!
|
Selected Links:

|