Proposal to Create An ìEcoVillageî at UVM

 

Robert Costanza, John Todd, Deane Wang, Jon Erickson, Marjan van den Belt, Pat Erickson

 

Motivation

                UVM is well on itís way to achieving itís vision of becoming the worldís premiere environmental university. As part of this, it needs to take a leadership role in developing models of sustainable communities.  It must do this at several scales, from local  to global. There are significant advantages to creating a ìmodelî small-scale sustainable community on or near the campus itself, to serve as a laboratory for developing and testing new ideas.

                At the same time, this model sustainable community can provide an experiment in improved student housing. Clustering students together with only other students clearly does not provide an optimal living/learning environment. Nor does segregating any of the many other rich patterns of diversity that exist in our world.  Our vision is to create an integrated living and learning environment where students, faculty, other citizens and the larger community can interact on many levels, both with each  other and with the built, agricultural, and natural environments.  To do this we propose creating an ìecovillageî at the University of Vermont.

There are several historical precedents for this approach.  The traditional British residential college is one, where faculty and students shared adjacent living quarters and common areas.  This created an extremely valuable enrichment of the educational experience for both students and faculty.  We wish to extend and update this model, by adding residents from the community at large and by focusing the village on the theme of creating a model for sustainable communities of the present and future.  The process of developing and maintaining this community would make a unique contribution to scholarship on sustainability. 

 

Basic Characteristics:

Plan

                The University owns land both near campus and further removed (one likely location might be in the experimental farms areas south of campus).  If the university were to contribute the land, the ìdevelopersî (a small group of faculty and community leaders) would design, raise the funds, and build the ecovillage.  This approach would place almost no additional burden on the current ambitious capital campaign.

It could either be stipulated in the contract with the University that a certain number of units would be reserved for rental to students at the common rate, or the University could own the student rental units itself and could manage them as part of the overall student housing pool.  The remaining units would be owned by the faculty or other residents.



Living Machine