Two-page
Response Papers
You must
complete a total of five two-page response papers, including papers on
four of the questions given below, each of which should be based on the
appropriate class reading. These should be stapled and typed with
one-inch margins to allow for my comments; you should also proofread
them for spelling, grammar, and typographical errors. These four
papers must be submitted in hard copy at the beginning of class on the
day the relevant reading is due (see due dates given below), unless you
are ill or have a family emergency. In addition, you must attend
one outside musical event and write a two-page reflection discussing
your experience of the event as it relates to one of our course
readings.
When quoting
passages from the readings in your papers, use the following method of
citation:
As Father Aaron
puts it, "'You may feel separated from grace right now, but in reality
you are probably closer to it now than you ever were before'" (125).
Note that the
final period goes after the citation of the page number in
parentheses. The same principle would apply if this ended with a
question mark, exclamation point, semicolon or comma.
When you end a
sentence with a passage that is set off by quotes (without a
parenthetical citation), here's the basic rule:
•
commas and periods come before the quotation marks
•
semicolons and colons come after the quotation marks
•
question marks and exclamation points go before the quotation marks
when they apply only to what is quoted and outside when they apply to
the whole statement
I hope this is
clear; if not, let me know. Just to confuse matters further,
British style differs from American style, so books published in Europe
follow a different set of rules.
1. Salzman (due 1/25):
Do you think the
author is sympathetic to the character's religious experience, or does
he explain it away as a medical problem? Quote at least one
passage in support of your position.
Note that you
don't have to argue one or the other side if you think that the author
both is sympathetic to her religious experience and explains it
medically.
There's no
clearly right or wrong answer to this question; I'm concerned to see
how well you argue your position and how well your quote(s) support
that position.
2. Shweder (due 2/8):
Shweder argues
that the character, eliciting circumstances, expression, and meaning of
emotions vary greatly across cultures. If this is the case, does
it follow that our sense of a shared emotional identification with
people from another culture may be misleading and therefore we should
maintain emotional detachment if we want to understand them? Give an
example of a personal experience that supports your position.
3. Bhagavad Gita (due
2/27):
In chapter 11 of
the BG, Arjuna begs for and is granted a direct vision of his
charioteer Krishna's true divine nature. Discuss what this vision
reveals to Arjuna (quote at least one relevant passage here) and
explain how it
resolves Arjuna's moral dilemma.
4. Sagan (due 3/20):
In the first
essay we read by Richard Shweder, he observes:
"One of the
central myths of the modern period in the West is the idea that the
opposition between religion-superstition-revelation and
logic-science-rationality divides the world into then and now, them and
us. According to this myth the world woke up and became good
about three centuries ago when Enlightenment thinkers began to draw
some distinctions between things that premodern thinkers had managed to
overlook" ("The Astonishment of Anthropology," p. 2).
Define what Carl
Sagan means by science (quoting appropriate passages from his work) and
explain why you think he either does or does not subscribe to the
position (or "myth") that Shweder describes above.
5. Titon (due 4/12):
Titon, in his
discussion of ethnomusicology, highlights a mode of knowing that is
inter-subjective and that highlights personal experience in the context
of human relationships. The Sharf essay on "experience" that we
read at the beginning of the semester is critical of appeals to
personal experience in scholarly analysis. Identify what you
think are the key differences between these two approaches and explain
which is more appropriate to the program in which you are majoring and
why.
6. Dewey (due 4/24):
Dewey argues
strongly for the importance of real-life experience in the process of
education, and for the relevance of the "scientific method" in coming
to understand that experience. Commenting on his emphasis on
scientific analysis, he notes: "But the meaning of the emphasis placed
on scientific method has little to do with specialized
techniques. It means that scientific method is the only authentic
means at our command
for getting at
the significance of our everyday experiences of the world in which we
live" (p. 88). What does Dewey mean by scientific method?
Explain why you agree or disagree with his statement.
Response
to Personal Musical Experience
The intent of
this assignment is to give you the chance to reflect critically on the
nature of musical experience and on what you can learn from it. The
Titon reading, which will be coming up on 4/12, raises some issues
about ethnomusicology and the task of understanding music. Our
Shweder readings also raise questions about cross-cultural
understanding. These provide useful background for thinking about
what you experience at the concert, and your reflection paper should
examine one issue raised in one of these readings in the context of
your personal experience at the concert. I recommend that you
review the readings before you attend and jot down passages that you
think may be relevant. You should also take notes during or
immediately after the concert so that you can recall specific aspects
of the experience when you write your response. Be sure to
include information on when and where the concert took place. This
paper is due in class within one week of the event that you attend.
Copyright
2007
Kevin Trainor
Last updated: 2/22/07