Emperor and Slave: Classics 95 Midterm
- Short questions: write at most a few sentences about the
following: this should take you at most 15 minutes. Leave a full blank
sheet in the blue book after each answer, so that you can come back and
add more if it occurs to you and you have time.
- How do we improve our rational faculty?
what role do internal
things and external things play in the process?
- What does Epictetus think about the
value of life?
- What is evil according to Epictetus?
- For each of the following quotations, do the following:
this part should take at most one hour (about 8 minutes per quotation):
leave a full blank page in the blue book after each answer so that you
can come back and add if you have time.
- Rewrite the
most important sequence of thoughts in the following
entirely in your own words:
- Do not use any of the same words or phrases: use your
own words.
- Identify what
important issues the quotation addresses and explain what it says about them
- If you see connections to other aspects of Epictetus'
thoughts, very briefly explain those connections.
- BEGIN the morning by saying to thyself, I shall meet
with the
busybody, the ungrateful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, unsocial. All
these things happen to them by reason of their ignorance of what is
good and evil. But I who have seen the nature of the good that it is
beautiful and of the bad that it is ugly, and the nature of him who
does wrong, that it is akin to me, not [only] of the same blood or
seed, but that it participates in [the same] intelligence and [the
same] portion of the divinity, I can neither be injured by any of them,
for no one can fix on me what is ugly, nor can I be angry with my
kinsman, nor hate him. For we are made for co-operation, like feet,
like hands, like eyelids, like the rows of the upper and lower teeth.
To act against one another then is contrary to nature; and it is acting
against one another to be vexed and to turn away. (Marcus Aurelius
Antoninus, Meditations Book
II §1)
- This thou must always bear in mind, what is the nature
of the
whole, and what is my nature, and how this is related to that, and what
kind of a part it is of what kind of a whole; and that there is no one
who hinders thee from always doing and saying the things which are
according to the nature of which thou art a part. (Marcus Aurelius
Antoninus, Meditations Book
II §9)
- the animal is constituted so as to do all things for
itself ...
universally, Zeus has made the nature of the rational animal such that
it
cannot obtain any one of its own proper interests, if it does not
contribute something to the common interest. In this manner and sense
it is not unsociable for a man to do everything, for the sake of
himself. For what do you expect? that a man should neglect himself and
his own interest? And how in that case can there be one and the same
principle in all animals, the principle of attachment to themselves?
(Epictetus Discourse 19)
- Now reason, for what purpose has it been given by
nature? For
the right use of appearances. What is it then itself? A system of
certain appearances. So by its nature it has the faculty of
contemplating itself so. Again, sound sense, for the contemplation of
what things does it belong to us? Good and evil, and things which are
neither. What is it then itself? Good. And want of sense, what is it?
Evil. Do you see then that good sense necessarily contemplates both
itself and the opposite? For this reason it is the chief and the first
work of a philosopher to examine appearances, and to distinguish them,
and to admit none without examination. (Epictetus Discourses 20)
- “I have pain in the head.” Do not say, “Alas!” “I have
pain in
the ear.” Do not say, “Alas!” I do not say that you are not allowed
to groan, but do not groan inwardly (Epictetus Discourse 18) (OVER: THERE IS MORE ON THE BACK)
- “Ought not then this robber and this adulterer to be
destroyed?” By no means say so, but speak rather in this way: “This man
who has been mistaken and deceived about the most important things, and
blinded, not in the faculty of vision which distinguishes white and
black, but in the faculty which distinguishes good and bad, should we
not destroy him?” If you speak thus, you will see how inhuman this is
which you say, and that it is just as if you would say, “Ought we not
to destroy this blind and deaf man?” But if the greatest harm is the
privation of the greatest things, and the greatest thing in every man
is the will or choice such as it ought to be, and a man is deprived of
this will, why are you also angry with him? Man, you ought not to be
affected contrary to nature by the bad things of another. Pity him
rather (Epictetus Discourse 18)
- you have a will free by nature from hindrance and
compulsion;
this is written here in the viscera. I will show you this first in the
matter of assent. Can any man hinder you from assenting to the truth?
No man can. Can any man compel you to receive what is false? No man
can. You see that in this matter you have the faculty of the will free
from hindrance, free from compulsion, unimpeded.” Well, then, in the
matter of desire and pursuit of an object, is it otherwise? And what
can overcome pursuit except another pursuit? And what can overcome
desire and aversion except another desire and aversion? But, you
object: “If you place before me the fear of death, you do compel me.”
No, it is not what is placed before you that compels, but your opinion
that it is better to do so-and-so than to die. In this matter, then, it
is your opinion that compelled you: that is, will compelled
will.
(Epictetus Discourse 17)