Thus it appears certain to me, by
a great variety of proofs,
that Cambyses was raving mad; he would not else have set himself
to
make a mock of holy rites and long-established usages. For if one
were
to offer men to choose out of all the customs in the world such as
seemed to them the best, they would examine the whole number, and
end by preferring their own; so convinced are they that their own
usages far surpass those of all others. Unless, therefore, a man
was
mad, it is not likely that he would make sport of such matters.
That
people have this feeling about their laws may be seen by very many
proofs: among others, by the following. Darius, after he had got
the
kingdom, called into his presence certain Greeks who were at
hand, and
asked- "What he should pay them to eat the bodies of their fathers
when they died?" To which they answered, that there was no sum
that
would tempt them to do such a thing. He then sent for certain
Indians,
of the race called Callatians, men who eat their fathers, and
asked
them, while the Greeks stood by, and knew by the help of an
interpreter all that was said - "What he should give them to burn
the bodies of their fathers at their decease?" The Indians
exclaimed
aloud, and bade him forbear such language. Such is men's wont
herein; and Pindar was right, in my judgment, when he said, "Law
is
the king o'er all."
Author: __________________ Title: _____________________
How do you figure it out? the passage 1) tells a neat little story, 2)
discusses comparative customs, 3) concerns Greeks and Persians. From
those three facts, the best educated guess is "Herodotus" and "The
Persian War," because Herodotus was history's first ethnographer (and
the only one we have read in this class), wrote his history
anecdotally, and wrote about Persians and Greeks. Herodotus' only work
was "The Persian War."