• MURPHY, DAVID J. “Isocrates and the Dialogue.” The Classical World, vol. 106, no. 3, 2013, pp. 311–353., www.jstor.org/stable/24699930. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• Good about genre questions: dialog, sokratikoi logoi, antilogikoi, etc.
• also offers assessment of Isocrates as a read of and reactor to Socratic dialogues.
• Kalouche, Fouad. “ANTISTHENES' ETHICS & THEORY OF LANGUAGE.” Revue De Philosophie Ancienne, vol. 17, no. 1, 1999, pp. 11–41. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/24354658. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• Starts out with introductory material on Antisthenes
• then moves on to philosophical matters suggested in title
• KURKE, LESLIE. “Plato, Aesop, and the Beginnings of Mimetic Prose.” Representations, vol. 94, no. 1, 2006, pp. 6–52. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rep.2006.94.1.6. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• An effort to explore the oral-literate boundary and the prose-poetry boundary via exploring the links between prose, Aesop, and Plato, all in an effort to approach Plato's famous denunciation of poetry not as a dictum for all time, but as a dictum specifically for his time which was part of his invention of philosophy.
• literary-theoretic (not impenetrably so, however) rather than philosophical, but with implications for philosophy, particularly Socratic/Platonic dialogue.
• Christopher Moore. “CHAEREPHON THE SOCRATIC.” Phoenix, vol. 67, no. 3/4, 2013, pp. 284–300. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.7834/phoenix.67.3-4.0284. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• Chaerophon is depicted in Plato and Xenophon as a constant companion of Socrates. He wrote nothing and seems to be depicted as having no particular ideas. So why is he there? Who is he?
  
• This article attempts to tease out who Chaerophon was and how he might be important or interesting.
  
• Brancacci, Aldo. “The Double ‘Daimōn’ in Euclides the Socratic.” Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, vol. 38, no. 2, 2005, pp. 143–154. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40914001. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• A long careful look at one fragmentary thought.
• Recent, so it should lead to other bibliogrpahy.
• Murphy, David J. “‘BY THE GOOSE, BY THE RAM’. SOCRATES’ OTHER UNUSUAL OATHS.” Studi Classici e Orientali, vol. 62, 2016, pp. 15–52. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26494973. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• Tracking reports of Socrates' unusual oaths back as close as possible to Socrates' lifetime, possibly to sources in the sokratikoi logoi, in an effort to determine what can be said about their authenticity as Socratic.
• Ford, Andrew L. “ΣΩKPATIKOI ΛOΓOI in Aristotle and Fourth-Century Theories of Genre.” Classical Philology, vol. 105, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221–235. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656195. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• An examination of what Aristotle has to say about the sokratikoi logoi : claims to avoid Platonocentrism in defining what a Socratic dialogues is.
• Yonezawa, Shigeru. “SOCRATIC ELEMENTS IN AESCHINES' 'ALCIBIADES' AND PLATO'S SOCRATIC DIALOGUES.” Hermes, vol. 140, no. 4, 2012, pp. 490–500. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43652911. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• On the track of the historical Socrates via Aeschines.
• Schaps, David M. “Socrates and the Socratics: When Wealth Became a Problem.” The Classical World, vol. 96, no. 2, 2003, pp. 131–157. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4352734. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
• an interesting article on Athenian attitudes toward wealth as well as Xenophon's Socrates', Plato's Socrates', and Aristotle's attitudes toward wealth. No mention of other Socratics: anyone want to see if there is anything there?