Graded Material in CLAS1640 Trojan War:
NOTE: Mid-semester warning letters will be based on performance on
the midterm and whether or not you have done or at least figured
out, gotten approval for, and scheduled what you are doing for one
of the non-poster semi-mandatory assignments before the midterm,
because those together account for 40% of the grade you earn.
II. SEMI-MANDATORY MATERIAL
POSTER SESSIONS ON APRIL 29 and MAY 1: THE REST OF THESE ARE
SMALL PROJECTS THAT MUST BE DONE on or before the last day of
classes (THIS IS SO THAT PROF. BAILLY HAS TIME TO FIGURE OUT
WHAT GRADE YOU EARNED).
- HOW IT WORKS:
- There are 5 sorts of things in the list below. You must do
30 possible-points worth (30% of your grade). You may do as
many of them as you like until you have done 35
possible-points worth: after you have done 35 possible-points,
you can keep going just for the sheer joy of it.
- Doing 30 possible-points worth does not necessarily mean
that you get 30 points: these will be graded for quality as
described below.
- It is likely that there will not be enough class time to
schedule all of these: they can be recorded and posted for the
class and others to watch.
- Early bird incentive: skits, games, and presentations done
in February will get 2 additional points added: those done in
March will get 1 additional point.
- Yes, you may do more than one of the same assignment.
- Almost everyone does a poster.
- IMPORTANT ASSESSMENT CRITERIA THAT APPLY TO ALL OF THESE:
- Must be centered on some aspect of the Trojan War or the
central reading assigned to this class (Homer, Tragedies
about Trojan War material, or Aeneid).
- Must include critical interaction with that material.
- In other words, the assignment must present analysis that
goes beyond description, plot summary, or re-presentation:
it must be clear that you put critical thought into
this and what that critical thought is. Think of it this
way: this is not just show-and-tell. It should go beyond
that to offer intelligent thoughtful opinions backed up by
evidence. Your own thought should be front and center and it
should be about important things.
- Must pay attention to details:
- details of the material presented (i.e. don't be vague:
use specific and appropriate examples,
words, images, etc. from your primary sources)
- detailed critical thought presented (again don't be vague:
be as specific and careful as you can in your thoughts)
- detailed in presentation/style matters (cite sources
precisely, be consistent, use language carefully and
precisely)
- Posters: 15 points possible
- More information and suggestions for these posters will be
given in classes before the poster sessions.
- The 'poster sessions' are on APRIL 29 and MAY 1 (up to 50 on
each day: last names A-H (or so) on April 29, the rest on May
1
- You must get your poster to Bailly's office after
class. They become way to heavy and awkward for Bailly to
carry them all to his office.
- The major criteria for grading that are specific to
posters (see above for more general assessment criteria):
- Does the poster work visually? This can be broken
down into:
- is it visually interesting?
- does the visual presentation contribute to the
class-related content?
- It needs to be more than text on a poster: the visual
layout and nature of the project must contribute to the
intellectual part of the project.
- Does the poster incorporate (a significant amount of)
important and interesting material from the course material?
- Is there thought present in the poster: analysis,
intellectual angles, etc.: in other words, is it 'academic'
and did it take a lot of thought about our material and
display that thought?
- Skits:
- 15 points for you if you solo write a skit (co-writers
get a bit more than half that): writer(s) need not act in
skit
- points for acting based on how many lines you have:
minimum 3 points, maximum 8 points per actor is offered.
- SKIT SCRIPT AND PROGRAM:
- Skit team is responsible for giving Bailly a script with
the author(s) names clearly given and also, on a separate
sheet, a breakdown of 1) the cast, 2) how many lines each
actor has, 3) a description of props (and who should get
credit for them if they involved significant effort), 4) a
description of costumes (and who should get credit for them
if they involved significant effort)
- Skit members may choose to simply divide total points for
the skit among the whole group.
- Skits must be 5 minutes long, give or take 30 seconds at
most: rehearse it: minus 1 point per person for 15 seconds
shorter than 4.5 min. or longer than 5.5 minutes
- Write your own
- There must be a plot and characters.
- No reality shows, no game shows: no bachelorette,
no survivor, no jeopardy.
- Material may be borrowed directly from reading assignments
but it may depart significantly from them as long as it is
still clearly and centrally focused on Trojan War-related
content.
- Plus approximately one point per actor for not having to
hold a script in your hand.
- Yes, have costumes and props, but if they
are good enough to be things worth evaluating in themselves,
they can get extra points
- Maximum points for one person per skit: 20 points. Maximum
total points offered per skit for all involved in that skit:
50.
- Skits are graded by a sort of overall impression method plus
counting lines and actors, and the general assessment criteria
above.
- Presentations:
- Presentations are 5 minutes: longer will have points
subtracted (so rehearse it).
- Graded based on quality of content and planning/organization
of presentation.
- If someone is already doing it, find another topic: first
come first served
- Scholarly Articles or Chapters (15 pages or more
from a peer-reviewed journal or book publisher: must be
available to everyone via Howe library) centered on class
material.
- 20 points possible
- Present a short summary of an article, book chapter, or
set of articles to the class.
- There must be visual aids and notes that can be posted
for the class to review (notes are required to be
sufficient for someone who was not there to learn the
material presented).
- Afterlife of the Trojan War in the arts
- 15 points possible
- Presentation is 5 minutes
- Find something from later times that is inspired by the
legends and/or the reading material of this class,
read/view/analyze/review it and present it to the class.
- Literature: novels, poems, etc.
- Entertainment: movies, series, etc.
- Art: paintings, sculpture, etc.
- Music: opera, etc.
- Not art, but allowable: Games: re-enactment games,
etc.
- Most of you have read Percy Jackson: there is no need
to present it and it is barely up to the level of
literature desired.
- We want serious literature, attempts at serious art.
- You must get Prof. Bailly or Ms. Podgorski's approval.
- How to determine if it's appropriate:
- Is it 'self-published'? If so, there's a 99% chance
it will not be allowed.
- Is it found only on 'social media'? If so, there's a
99% chance it will not be allowed.
- Does it demonstrate good knowledge of some part of
the Trojan War material from our class and interact
with it? If yes, that's a good sign.
- Is it lengthy and weighty enough (a one minute video
is not, for instance). If yes, that's a good sign.
- Is it by a well-known artist/maker? If yes, that's a
good sign.
- Does it have reviews in mainstream media? If yes,
that's a good sign.
- Other presentations
- 15 points possible
- Any academically-inspired topic relevant to this class
is appropriate for a presentation
- A few ideas to get you started:
- Archaeology
- Weapons
- Textiles
- Oral epics in other cultures
- Again, you must get Prof. Bailly's or Ms. Podgorski's
approval.
- Games:
- Make a game that centrally involves material from
this class and give a presentation about it to the
class.
- original game: 15 points possible
- fully re-writing an existing game to center it on Trojan
war (from lore to mechanics to pieces to characters,
etc.): 12 points possible
- team efforts: more than a total of 15 points for the
team is possible, but not a simple multiple of the number
on team: negotiate with Bailly.
- Games will be graded on an overall impression of how
relevant to the course, quality, thoughtfulness, in-game
world creation, game mechanics explanation/choice, and the
overall concept.
- Criteria used to assess presentations (see also the
general assessment criteria above)
- Required elements: 5-minute presentation, notes in a
format that can be linked to the course website
(bullet-pointed lists preferred: pdf is a good format).
- Organization: is the material organized in a way that
clearly reveals what the main points are, what the evidence
for them is, and what the minor points are. Another way to
think of this is to ask yourself whether the structure of
the presentation and the notes makes really good sense.
- 5 minutes: use all 5 minutes, but no more: this takes
rehearsal.
- The notes need to be good enough for people who missed the
presentation to understand and learn the material provided
in the presentation: are they sufficient for 'stand-alone'
readers?
- Whatever else you want to do: 15 points possible
- This is here for out-of-the-box thinkers
- Surprise us
- Impress us
- Must be obviously and significantly relevant to the course
material
- Bailly must approve at least a week before
- Homer-a-thon
- An outdoor all-day event reading Homer aloud to the world.
- 2 points for reading for at least 5 minutes.
- Details TBA.
I. MANDATORY MATERIAL:
- QUIZZES: 2 kinds: no makeups ever for any reason (but
it is highly unlikely that that will hurt you)
- "beginning of class quizzes":
- worth 8% of grade: do 2/3 of them for full credit
- NOTE: this means that you can miss every third
beginning-of-class quiz, about 5 weeks worth, and still
get full credit.
- You can drop a proposed quiz question off at the front of
class before class begins.
- A group of you will then go outside the classroom and pick
about 3 of those questions.
- Those questions plus an 'interesting question' from you
will be the quiz.
- an 'interesting question' is one about class material
that cannot be answered with just a fact: it requires some
explanation, thought, analysis, background knowledge,
research, etc.
- you will put these on your quiz.
- The quizzes will not be graded for correctness: they will
be graded for being done. There may be an opportunity to
talk to each other and assess and change your answers.
- Hand it in, fully done, and you get full credit.
- Hand in a proposed question before class and you get more
credit: 0.125%/question: at most 2% extra credit is possible
here.
- The question must be suitable and appropriate and doable
as a quiz question (i.e. answerable in at most a few
words, often just a name or two: not too too obvious, not
too too obscure, important, and a good thing to
know/remember) do this in the right spirit and you get the
credit.
- "after-each-class quizzes"
- worth 12% of grade: 3 will be dropped
- These quizzes will be available on Brightspace soon after
class.
- These quizzes must be done by the next class day.
- You can retake these quizzes again and again: top grade
counts.
- Suggestion: do it soon after class until you get 100%.
- Quizzes will be on what was discussed in the class that
day: class notes will be posted online that have the answers
in them.
- There will not actually be one after every class: after
classes in which new material was not presented (exams,
etc.), there is no point in such a quiz. On some other days,
there may not be one.
- MIDTERM: 25% of the grade
- Partially made up of 'After-each-class quizzes' material.
- plus:
- Factual questions
- Short ID's
- Passage identification
- FINAL: 25% of the grade
- SAME AS MIDTERM
- Concentrates on second half of course, but does not
ignore the first half.
II.
III. EXTRA CREDIT
- Extra Credit: Attend an academic guest lecture
in any subject that is not part of a regular course or
assigned for a regular course, write up a one-page
summary of it, and hand it in to Bailly. +1% on final grade for
each of these you do, up to 4%.
- To give you an idea of what qualifies:
- The idea here is to attend lectures by scholars who have
been invited to UVM to talk about their research.
- What might not qualify? An alumni career event or a talk
about practicalities of personal finance or student study
abroad experience in Italy or how to make a backyard pottery
kiln are great, truly, but they are not so much the idea
here.