Public Banking and Monetary Policy

There is obviously a crisis in the banking system since the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 (GFC).  "Too-Big-to-Fail" (TBTF) Banks were bailed out by the taxpayers and by the federal reserve bank.  According to William Black, an S&L Regulator and investigator,  the GFC was 60 times bigger than the Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980's, yet not a single banker was investigated or indicted for misdeeds, while the Savings and loan scandal resulted in thousands of indictments and many convictions.  Numerous banks were put into receivership, bad assets sold off, and the remaining solvent portions put back into business.  None of this happened during the GFC.  In fact, global financial regulators have put into place a system of "bail-ins" where depositor funds will be used to bail out the big banks (*G-SIFIs and *D-SIBs) during the next financial crisis.  This scandal has resulted in a great deal of interest in reforms to monetary policy and interest in public banking.
*G-SIFI = Globally Systemically Important Financial Institutions
*D-SIB = Domestically Systemically Important Banks

Recently during the "net neutrality" debate President Obama proposed the idea that the internet should be perceived a public utility, since it has become so pervasive in our lives, and equal access so important.  This is even more true of the monetary system, which should be a common asset we all share.  Instead of treating the money supply as a public utility, something that we all use and need access to, it is primarily a source of profit for the private banking system.  

97% of the money supply is created by private banks in the form of interest-bearing loans, mainly for real estate.  Only 3% are bills and coins.  This may be shocking to some people to realize, since neo-classical economics claims wrongly that banks are just intermediaries loaning out savings of depositors to borrowers.  This misunderstanding is widespread.  The monetary system has lost all connection to the real economy as Investment Banks, Hedge Funds, etc. primarily speculate in existing assets and commodities using computer arbitrage, and simultaneously the real sector is starved for credit.  The fact that every dollar created requires interest paid back on it, makes infinite growth an absolute necessity to generate the growing returns needed to pay back the dollars loaned.  Nothing is more fundamental to ecological economics than the fact that infinite growth is impossible on a finite planet.  Therefore the monetary system must change, and money must not be created with interest.  Many ecological economists are calling for 100% reserve requirements, so banks no longer could produce the money supply, and it would returned to government.

There are many possible approaches to monetary reform.  Some current areas of exploration are complementary currencies, time banks, mutual credit, cryptocurrency, public banks, and public credit.  Gund has done work on several of these topics.


Public Banking

Documents

Links


Monetary Policy

Documents

Links


Projects homepage

Contact: Gary Flomenhoft | gary.flo@uvm.edu