<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ents/eugenics.xsl"?>
<TEI>

   <teiHeader><fileDesc>

         <titleStmt>

            <title>Long Sterilization Bill
Debate: a machine readable edition</title>

            <author/>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Creation of machine-readable version:</resp>

               <name>Nancy Gallagher</name>
            </respStmt><respStmt>
               
               <resp>Additional scanning and OCR:</resp>

               <name>Ben Schacher</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup:</resp>

               <name>Mary
Margaret Welch</name>
            </respStmt><respStmt>
               
               <resp>Additional markup by:</resp>

               <name>Hope Greenberg,
Shane Barney</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

         </titleStmt>

         <extent>ca. 7 kilobytes</extent>

         <publicationStmt><publisher>University of Vermont</publisher><pubPlace>Burlington, Vermont USA</pubPlace><availability>

               <p>Available from: UVM Electronic text Archive</p>

               <p>URL: http://etext.uvm.edu</p>

            </availability><date>July/2000</date></publicationStmt>

         <sourceDesc>

            <biblFull>

               <titleStmt>

                  <title level="a">Long Sterilization Bill Debate</title>

                  <title level="j">The Burlington Free Press</title>

                  <author/>

                  <editor/>

               </titleStmt>

               <editionStmt>

                  <p>March 25, 1931</p>

               </editionStmt>

               <publicationStmt><publisher>The Burlington Free Press</publisher><pubPlace>Burlington, Vermont</pubPlace><date>March 25,
1931</date></publicationStmt>

               <notesStmt>

                  <note/>

               </notesStmt>

            </biblFull>

         </sourceDesc>

      </fileDesc><encodingDesc>

         <projectDesc>

            <p>Prepared for the University of Vermont Electronic Text Archive.</p>

         </projectDesc>

         <editorialDecl>

            <p>Scanner: Visioneer 6100 (36 bit, 600x1200).
Text OCR by Visioneer. </p>

            <p>Quote marks retained as data. All "M" and "N" dashes converted to two hyphens or one
hyphen, respectively. All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and the trailing   
part of a word has been joined to the preceding line. Some text realigned to left for purposes of
readability, at discretion of editors.</p>

         </editorialDecl>

      </encodingDesc><profileDesc>

         <creation>
            <date>March 25, 1931</date> 
         </creation>

         <textClass>

            <keywords scheme="#">

               <term>WE'LL LET NANCY DETERMINE THESE</term>

            </keywords>

         </textClass>

      </profileDesc></teiHeader>

   <text>

      <front>

         <div1>

            <bibl>
               <title level="a">Long Sterilization Debate<title level="j">Burlington Free
Press</title>
               </title>
               <author/>
               <date>March 25, 1931</date>
               <biblScope>pp. 11, 
15</biblScope>
               <note type="location" anchored="true">Newspaper clipping from faculty file of Henry F. 
Perkins, University of Vermont Archives</note>
            </bibl> 
         </div1> 
      </front>

      <body>

         <div1>

            <head>
               <hi rend="bold">
                  <hi rend="center">Long Sterilization Bill Debate</hi>
               </hi>
            </head>

            <p>The sterilization measure was passed
in the House after almost two hours of debate which opened after
Speaker Deavitt had warned the House members against indulging in
personal remarks, such as were exchanged when the measure was up
for advancement to third reading last Friday.</p>

            <p>The bill provides for the sterilization of idiots, imbeciles,
feeble‐minded, and insane.  The persons themselves or guardians
must consent to the operation and two doctors must pass judgment as
to whether or not the person is a fit subject for operation.</p>

            <p>Burke of Burlington, Edgerton of Manchester, Ellis of Fair
Haven, Ober of Johnson and Davis of Bridgewater headed the
opposition while Miss Hull of Shoreham and Harding of Fairlee were
the only proponents of the measure.</p>

            <p>Every woman in the House the exception of Mrs. Farr of
Monkton, who was absent, favored bill.</p>

            <p> There were 31 members absent when the roll was called.</p>

            <p>Burke opened debate by questioning Mrs. Bickford as to
whether or not she would approve of having feeble‐minded persons,
idiots or imbeciles even though sterilized released into her
community. He claimed even strong‐willed persons yielded to
temptation. Mrs. Bickford said the question should have been asked
the chairman of the committee on public health instead of her.</p>

            <p>Edgerton then launched into a lengthy and eloquent plea for
the defeat of the measure. He said the passage of such a measure
would decrease procreation of idiots but it would not decrease
immorality.  He claimed the title of the bill was sugar‐coated and that
disaster came to communities placing money before God.  He
declared that if the inmates of State schools were sterilized and
released it would only mean the State would have a lot of undesirable
paupers on its hands.</p>

            <p>Referring to the section dealing with the doctors, Edgerton
said he admired country doctors but felt that while they would not be
prejudiced in handling cases they would be subjected to the
prejudices of the small communities. He then called the bill a white‐washing process, a blindfold and an immoral bugaboo. He declared
that the sins and crimes of today were not committed by feeble‐minded persons as crime had become art.</p>

            <p>Edgerton added that race suicide had been the practice for
years and now race murder is contemplated.  He said a forced
consent was no consent as no one but the person to be operated on
bad the right to sanction such an operation.</p>

            <p>Ellis read a letter received from a woman protesting against
the passage the bill, and Ober of Johnson said no one had the right to
interfere with the functions God has bestowed upon humans. Davis
argued against the liberation of feeble‐minded persons. He added,
"we represent the people of the State. The question was not brought
up before election. It was not mentioned in the campaign, therefore
the people have not passed on it. There are several petitions here
against this bill but none in favor of it."</p>

            <p>Miss Hull answered the State had a welfare department
which was capable of caring for and watching the activities of those
liberated from institutions. Harding of West Fairlee said the House
should think of the poor suffering children that will come into the
world in the future if such a bill was not  passed.</p>

            <p>Those opposing passage were Aiken of Putney, Baker, Bell,
Brown of Moretown, Burke,. Butler, Clark of Dummerston, Corry,
Coyle, Daniels of Norton, Davis of Bridgewater, de Banville
Desmond, Dyer, Edgerton, Ellis, Farrell, Ferson, Field. Finnigan,
Gould of Canaan, Grant, Hall of Wilmington, Hanley, Hanson,
Harvey of Waterbury, Harvey of Duxbury, Hayes, Hitchcock, Hodge,
Holbrook, Horst, Houghton, Howe, Joslyn, Lakin, Leahy, Lesure,
Lucier, Lumbra, Mahar, McCullough, Metcalf, Miller, Murphy,
Myers, Newton of Granby, Norris, Ober, O'Shea, Page of Clarendon,
Park, Patrick, Peet, Perkins, Perry, Phalen, Pike, Pillsbury, Powers of
Waterford, Proctor, Barney, Richardson, Ross, Smith of Windham,
Stickney, Tatro, Tebeau, Temple, Thompson, Webb, Whitney of
Wardsboro, Wimett, Ayer, Bentley.</p>

            <p>Those absent were Bradshaw, Burleson, Collins, Cutler,
Elliot, Emery, Mrs. Farr, Fletcher, Gould of Elmore, Graves, Haire,
Hammond, Harrington, Haskins, Hunter, Johnson, Lane, Moultroup,
Palmer, Shutler, Sisco, Smith of Lyndon, Smith of Rutland City,
Smith of Starksboro, Start, Stufflebeam, Swanson, Whitney of
Salisbury, Whitney of  Tunbridge, Willis. All others voted for the
passage of the bill.</p>

         </div1>

      </body>

      <back>

         <div1>

            <p>
               <hi rend="bold">Publication Restrictions:</hi>
               <lb/>

The images and text on this web site are solely for education and research
uses. With the exception of government documents, images and texts may not
be used in digital or print form by organizations or commercial
enterprises except with written permission of the copyright holder or the
repository of origin. The materials may be used in digital or print form
with appropriate source citation in unpublished reports, classroom
instruction, research, community forums, and other non-profit
activities.<lb/>


               <lb/>
               <hi rend="bold">To access original document, contact: </hi>
               <lb/>
Special Collections, Bailey/Howe Library<lb/>
University of Vermont<lb/>
Burlington, VT 05405<lb/>

            </p>

         </div1>

      </back>

   </text>

</TEI>