<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ents/eugenics.xsl"?>
<TEI>
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Press releases on Sterilization Bill: a machine readable edition</title>
            <author>Associated Press</author>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Creation of machine-readable version:</resp>
               <name>Nancy Gallagher</name>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Additional scanning and OCR:</resp>
               <name>Ben Schacher</name>
               <name/>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup:</resp>
               <name>Mary Margaret Welch</name>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Additional markup by:</resp>
               <name>Hope Greenberg, Shane Barney</name>
               <name/>
            </respStmt>
         </titleStmt>
         <extent>ca. 7 kilobytes</extent>
         <publicationStmt>
            <publisher>University of Vermont</publisher>
            <pubPlace>Burlington, Vermont USA</pubPlace>
            <availability>
               <p>Available from: UVM Electronic text Archive</p>
               <p>URL: http://etext.uvm.edu</p>
            </availability>
            <date>July/2000</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <biblFull>
               <titleStmt>
                  <title level="a">Press releases on Sterilization Bill</title>

                  <title level="j">The Burlington Free Press</title>

                  <author>Associated Press</author>
                  <editor/>
               </titleStmt>
               <editionStmt>
                  <p>March 12, 13, 18, 1931</p>
               </editionStmt>
               <publicationStmt>
                  <publisher>The Burlington Free Press</publisher>
                  <pubPlace>Burlington, Vermont</pubPlace>
                  <date>March 12, 13, 18, 1931</date>
               </publicationStmt>
               <notesStmt>
                  <note/>
               </notesStmt>
            </biblFull>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <projectDesc>
            <p>Prepared for the University of Vermont Electronic Text Archive.</p>
         </projectDesc>
         <editorialDecl>
            <p>Scanner: Visioneer 6100 (36 bit, 600x1200). Text OCR by Visioneer. </p>
            <p>Quote marks retained as data. All "M" and "N" dashes converted to two hyphens or one
               hyphen, respectively. All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and the
               trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding line. Some text realigned to
               left for purposes of readability, at discretion of editors.</p>
         </editorialDecl>
      </encodingDesc>
      <profileDesc>
         <creation>

            <date>March 12, 13, 18, 1931</date>

         </creation>
      </profileDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text>
      <front>
         <div1>
            <bibl>

               <title level="a">Press releases on progress of sterilization bill in Vermont Senate</title>

               <title level="j">Burlington Free Press</title>

               <author/>

               <date>March 12, 13, &amp; 18, 1931</date>

               <note type="location" anchored="true">Newspaper clippings from the faculty file of
                  Henry F. Perkins, University of Vermont Archives</note>

            </bibl>

         </div1>

      </front>

      <body>
         <div1>

            <head>

               <hi rend="bold">

                  <hi rend="center">Sterilization Bill Advanced To Third Reading In Senate<lb/>On
                     Roll Call Vote, 21 to 7</hi>

               </hi>

            </head>

            <p>MONTPELIER, Vt., March 11 (AP)‐‐ The sterilization bill was advanced to the third
               reading in the Senate today on a roll call vote of 21 to 7. Two members, Senators
               Egelston and Olney were absent.</p>

            <p>Those voting for the bill, were Adams, Bancroft, Barber, Benson, Brewer, Clark,
               Comings, Goddete, Humphrey, Keyes, Leonard, Murdick, Northrop, Peet, Pierce,
               Rousseau, Shield, Stacey, Stone, Tupper, Wells.</p>

            <p>Those voting against the bill were Butterfield, Campbell, Grout, Hopkins, Lathrop,
               Webster, and Wills.</p>

            <p>Senator Webster alone voiced his objections to advancement of the bill. He said he
               objected because the measure calls upon ordinary physicians to make fine distinctions
               as to imbecility and idiocy. Then, he said, they have to decide if the persons
               affected know what is good for them. This is the kind of legislation, he said, that
               is "good for the other fellow," and he warned that imbecility and like mental
               diseases are not peculiar to any age or generation and may happen to anyone or any
               family at any time.</p>

            <p>"I don't like either," he continued, "any law which lets the overseer of the poor
               walk around the streets and pick out those likely to become a public charge and then
               recommend the provisions of this bill." Quoting from a letter he had received from a
               clergyman, he declared the bill to be an outrageous attack on the human person and
               against moral law. He assailed sterilization as a "fad that had come out of the West
               that is adopted and after awhile falls into disuse and is abandoned."</p>

            <p>The bill was advanced to third reading with amendments by the committee to which it
               had been recommended. These amendments make it incumbent that the physicians making
               the examination and performing the operation should be surgeons as well as
               physicians. They also fixed the fee to be paid for examination at $3 for each
               physician and surgeon and the fees to be paid for the operation at $20 for males and
               $30 for females.</p>
            <p>

               <hi rend="center">__________________________________________</hi>

            </p>
         </div1>

         <div1>
            <p>
               <hi rend="italic"> Burlington Free Press</hi>, March 13, 1931:</p>

            <p>
               <hi rend="center">Sterilization Bill Passed</hi>
            </p>

            <p>The sterilization bill passed the Senate today on a roll call vote of 22 to 8, after
               an amendment had been adopted removing the powers of the overseer of the poor to
               apply the terms of the measure to subjects he thought likely to become town charges.
               Senator Webster of Franklin attacked this provision of the bill and proposed an
               amendment which would eliminate a part of the section giving discretionary power over
               an overseer if he thought a person was likely to become a public charge. Barber of
               Windham agreed with Webster in this amendment but declared the section was going too
               far. He then proposed an amendment to Webster's amendment which would take away all
               power of the overseer of the poor in this matter. Pierce of Windsor supported Barber
               and the amendment was adopted. On the roll call vote, at the request of Tupper of
               Chittenden, the bill was passed.</p>

            <p>Those favoring passage of the bill were Adams, Bancroft, Barber, Benson, Brewer,
               Clark, Comings, Egelston, Goddete, Humphrey, Keyes, Leonard, Murdick, Northrop,
               Olney, Peet, Pierce, Rousseau, Shield, Stacey, Stone. Those opposed were Butterfield,
               Campbell, Grout, Hopkins, Lathrop, Tupper, Webster, and Wills.</p>
            <p>

               <hi rend="center">__________________________________________</hi>

            </p>

         </div1>

         <div1>
            <p>
               <hi rend="italic">Burlington Free Press</hi>, March 18, 1931:</p>
            <p>Sterilization Bill Reaches House</p>
            <p>The sterilization bill was read into the House today. It passed the Senate last week.
               Immediately following its first reading a protest from the St. Therese Court,
               Catholic Daughters of America, of Waterbury, was read protesting against the passage
               of such legislation.</p>
         </div1>
      </body>
      <back>
         <div1>
            <p>
               <hi rend="bold">Publication Restrictions:</hi>
               <lb/>The images and text on this web site are solely for education and research uses.
               With the exception of government documents, images and texts may not be used in
               digital or print form by organizations or commercial enterprises except with written
               permission of the copyright holder or the repository of origin. The materials may be
               used in digital or print form with appropriate source citation in unpublished
               reports, classroom instruction, research, community forums, and other non-profit activities.<lb/>
               <lb/>
               <hi rend="bold">To access original document, contact: </hi>
               <lb/> Special Collections, Bailey/Howe Library<lb/> University of Vermont<lb/>
               Burlington, VT 05405<lb/>
            </p>
         </div1>
      </back>
   </text>
</TEI>
