ToC Search About SiteMap Glossary

The Eugenics Survey in Vermont: Studies

Key Families in Rural Vermont Towns (1928-1929)

"Our basic thesis is this: The families that live in a town for several generations make their mark, for both good and ill, upon that town. They help or hinder its growth and give it their own moral, intellectual, and social tone. Most families, perhaps all, both add and detract from the welfare of their communities. Their contribution may be measured as regards the past, and predicted for the future in terms of their more positive hereditary traits, whether these are predominantly constructive or social, or destructive--antisocial."
Third Annual Report of the Eugenics Survey of Vermont, 1929

Harry Perkins devised the Key Family Study to demonstrate a relationship between family quality and the quality of life in rural towns. He termed this and subsequent studies as "eugenical-sociological" to align their investigations with the Vermont Commission on Country Life goal of improving rural conditions. After a general survey of several rural Vermont towns, the towns of Sandgate, Williston, and Lincoln were selected for the Key Family study. The southeastern Vermont towns of Readsboro and Sandgate had been a focus of Harriett Abbott's studies of rural degeneracy and provided the setting and background for Francis Conklin's 1928 study of "Better Branches of Degenerate Families."

Having been criticized for his emphasis on bad heredity in the Eugenics Survey's previous Annual Reports, Professor Perkins published Francis Conklin's "Study of the Better Branches" of the "Rectors" of Readsboro to show a more hopeful picture of Vermont families and a more charitable attitude of the Eugenics Survey to families formerly labelled as "degenerate." While Martha Wadman's field notes on families in Sandgate and Huntington reveal the Survey's continued search for bad heredity in isolated rural sections and the willingness of some townspeople to inform on their neighbors, Perkins chose to celebrate the endurance and vigor of the "old Vermont stocks" in their reports on old families in Williston and Lincoln. In the third and fourth Annual Reports, Lincoln is given the pseudonym "Garfield," and the key families nicknamed "Furman" and "Burr."


Recommended reading:
Kevin Dann, Lewis Creek Lost and Found (Hanover: University Press of New England, 2001). In "Blood Streams" (Chapter 10), Dann elegantly weaves the field investigations of the Eugenics Survey into the natural and cultural history of the Lewis Creek watershed.


Return to: Beginning of this section: Studies
Return to: Vermont Survey Table of Contents