PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE VIDEOS

Instruction	NPDA/APDA Debates
Preparation for Parliamentary Debating Panel Discussion John Meany, Claremont Lisa Heller, Bates Jud Legum, Claremont Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union	Ban Mobile Phones for Minors - Kyushu Japan
Being the Government: Proposition Strategy Judd Legum Claremont Colleges/Georgetown Law	Compilation of NPDA & APDA Videos
Opposition Strategy Marc Whitmore English Speaking Union	Compilation of NPDA Videos
Points of Information John Meany Claremont Colleges	This House would post the ten commandments in public school classrooms Bill Herman, Colorado State University, NPDA 1999 champion, Jethro Hayman, Cornell University, Eastern USA Debater of the Year 1996 VS. Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union & Arkansas State University, Terry McKnight, Forestworld.com, USA NDT Top Speaker 1972. Floor speeches included.
Reasoning & Probability David Berube University of South Carolina	This House would give reparations for slavery Part One \| Part Two Judd Legum, Claremont Colleges, twice national round robin champion, Jethro Hayman, Cornell VS. Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union, Terry McKnight, Forestworld.com
Judge and Audience Adaptation Judd Legum Claremont Colleges	National Parliamentary Debate Association National Championship 1999 Part One \| Part Two Creighton University(Mathey/Syrek) vs Colorado State University (Brodak/Herman) For More Information Visit the NPDA website
Speaking with Dynamism Alfred C. Snider University of Vermont	Racism contributes to US policy towards Africa NPDA Octafinal Debate Government: Univ of California at Berkeley Opposition: Creighton University Denver, Colorado, USA, March, 2001
Value Argumentation John Meany Claremont Colleges	This House would end the death penalty Demonstration debate between Judd Legum, Claremont, and Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union WDI, 2000
Counterpositions in Parliamentary Debating Steve Woods William Jewell College	The Rehnquist court made the wrong decision. NPDA Semifinal Debate Government: Univ of Wyoming Opposition: Truman State University Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001
Using Critiques in Parliamentary Debating John Meany Claremont	Despite negative consequences, we should act in accordance with principle. NPDA Final Debate Government: Univ of California at Berkeley Opposition: University of Wyoming Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001
Positioning in Parliamentary Debate Moving Beyond Yes and No John Meany Claremont	Despite negative consequences, we should act in accordance with principle. NPDA Final Debate Government: Univ of California at Berkeley Opposition: University of Wyoming Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001
Government Case Building Part One \| Part Two WDI 1999	The US needs a cultural renaissance NPDA Quarterfinal Debate Government: Truman State University Opposition: Univ of Californoia at Berkeley Denver, Colorado, USA, March, 2001
On Causality and Probability WDI 1999
Opposition Strategy Part One \| Part Two WDI 1999
HOW TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT, Alfred C. Snider, University of Vermont
On Public Debate Part One \| Part Two WDI 1999	If there is a video here that was posted without your permission, let me know and I will be glad to take it down. We attempt to get full permission from everyone involved. You can even change your mind years later. Let me know how I can serve you, because your video content belongs to you. alfred.snider@uvm.edu

Instruction

NPDA/APDA Debates

Preparation for Parliamentary Debating
Panel Discussion
John Meany, Claremont
Lisa Heller, Bates
Jud Legum, Claremont
Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union

Ban Mobile Phones for Minors - Kyushu Japan

Being the Government: Proposition Strategy
Judd Legum
Claremont Colleges/Georgetown Law

Compilation of NPDA & APDA Videos

Opposition Strategy
Marc Whitmore
English Speaking Union

Compilation of NPDA Videos

Points of Information
John Meany
Claremont Colleges

This House would post the ten commandments in public school classrooms
Bill Herman, Colorado State University, NPDA 1999 champion, Jethro Hayman, Cornell University, Eastern USA Debater of the Year 1996 VS. Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union & Arkansas State University, Terry McKnight, Forestworld.com, USA NDT Top Speaker 1972. Floor speeches included.

Reasoning & Probability
David Berube
University of South Carolina

This House would give reparations for slavery
Part One | Part Two
Judd Legum, Claremont Colleges, twice national round robin champion, Jethro Hayman, Cornell VS. Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union, Terry McKnight, Forestworld.com

Judge and Audience Adaptation
Judd Legum
Claremont Colleges

National Parliamentary Debate Association National Championship 1999 Part One | Part Two
Creighton University(Mathey/Syrek) vs Colorado State University (Brodak/Herman) For More Information Visit the NPDA website

Speaking with Dynamism
Alfred C. Snider
University of Vermont

Racism contributes to US policy towards Africa
NPDA Octafinal Debate
Government: Univ of California at Berkeley
Opposition: Creighton University
Denver, Colorado, USA, March, 2001

Value Argumentation
John Meany
Claremont Colleges

This House would end the death penalty
Demonstration debate between Judd Legum, Claremont, and Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union
WDI, 2000

Counterpositions in Parliamentary Debating
Steve Woods
William Jewell College

The Rehnquist court made the wrong decision.
NPDA Semifinal Debate
Government: Univ of Wyoming
Opposition: Truman State University
Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001

Using Critiques in Parliamentary Debating
John Meany
Claremont

Despite negative consequences, we should act in accordance with principle.
NPDA Final Debate
Government: Univ of California at Berkeley
Opposition: University of Wyoming
Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001

Positioning in Parliamentary Debate
Moving Beyond Yes and No
John Meany
Claremont

Government Case Building
Part One | Part Two
WDI 1999

The US needs a cultural renaissance
NPDA Quarterfinal Debate
Government: Truman State University
Opposition: Univ of Californoia at Berkeley
Denver, Colorado, USA, March, 2001

On Causality and Probability
WDI 1999

Opposition Strategy
Part One | Part Two
WDI 1999

HOW TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT, Alfred C. Snider, University of Vermont

On Public Debate
Part One | Part Two
WDI 1999

If there is a video here that was posted without your permission, let me know and I will be glad to take it down. We attempt to get full permission from everyone involved. You can even change your mind years later. Let me know how I can serve you, because your video content belongs to you. alfred.snider@uvm.edu

TITLE	INSTRUCTOR	TIME
Format: theory and strategy	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	45 minutes
Proposition analysis and interpretation	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	36 minutes
The Proposition case: constructing, researching, briefing	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	62 minutes
Points of information	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	40 minutes
Public speaking: the challenge of dynamism	Alfred C. Snider, University of Vermont	56 minutes
Disadvantages	John Gordon Miller, University of Vermont	65 minutes
Counterplans: advocacy for the opposition	Steve Woods, Western Washington University	58 minutes
Burdens of proof: issues and tests	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	38 minutes
Speaker duties	Steve Woods, Western Washington University	55 minutes
Critique	Kate Shuster, Claremont McKenna College	57 minutes
Rebuttals and weighing issues	Steve Llano, University of Rochester	60 minutes
Training drills and exercises	Alfred C. Snider, University of Vermont	31 minutes
Heckling and humor	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	32 minutes
Advanced seminar one	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	46 minutes
Advanced seminar two	Kate Shuster, Claremont McKenna College	32 minutes
Values and criteria: making a decision	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	41 minutes
Other formats	John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College	35 minutes