PROTECTING PRIVACY OF CONSUMER INFORMATION
INTERNET/CONSUMER AFFIRMATIVE CASE
AFFIRMATIVE SIGNIFICANCE
CORPORATIONS COLLECT HUGE AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION ABOUT CONSUMERS
COMPANIES AND WEBSITES HOLD HUGE STORE OF INFORMATION ABOUT EVERYONE
INFORMATION FROM VARIOUS SOURCES IS COMBINED, COMPOUNDING PRIVACY RISKS
TECHNOLOGY IS THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THE NEW LOSS OF PRIVACY
THINGS LOOK BLEAK FOR CONSUMER PRIVACY IN THE NEAR FUTURE
ONLINE PROFILING IS A PRIVACY THREAT
OTHER FORMS OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ARE PRIVACY THREATS
INTERNET INVADES THE PRIVACY OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH
TEEN GIRLS ARE SPECIFICALLY AT PRIVACY RISK
ONLINE INTRUSION STRIPS AWAY PRIVACY AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
NEW DYNAMIC OF INFORMATION IS A HUGE THREAT TO PRIVACY RIGHTS
INFORMATION GATHERING LEADS TO DAMAGING DISCRIMINATION
PRIVACY PROBLEMS ARE A THREAT TO A PROSPEROUS INTERNET
PEOPLE ARE SUCKERED INTO GIVING UP INFORMATION — INDIVIDUAL ACTION FAILS
AFFIRMATIVE INHERENCY
P3P APPROACH IN THE STATUS QUO FAILS
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL NOT CURRENTLY ENACT NEW PRIVACY REGULATIONS TO PROTECT CITIZENS
INDUSTRY LOBBYING PREVENTS THE STATUS QUO FROM PROTECTING PRIVACY
CURRENT PRIVACY REGULATORY MECHANISMS FAILS
CURRENT PRIVACY LAWS ARE INADEQUATE
SPECIFIC FEDERAL LAWS ARE INADEQUATE TO PROTECT PRIVACY
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT LETS BUSINESS TELL IT WHAT TO DO
CORPORATE POWER AND INCENTIVES DO NOT OPERATE TO PROTECT PRIVACY
VOLUNTARY PRIVACY POLICIES ARE A FAILURE
VOLUNTARY PRIVACY POLICIES SHOW THE NEED FOR GOVERNMENT ACTION
PRIVACY POLICIES ON SPECIFIC WEB SITES ARE INADEQUATE
AFFIRMATIVE SOLVENCY
NOW IS THE KEY TIME TO PROTECT PRIVACY
GOVERNMENT ACTION IS JUSTIFIED
PRIVACY LEGISLATION IS NEEDED AND WILL SUCCEED
TECHNOLOGY DOES NOT MAKE SOLVENCY IMPOSSIBLE
PUBLIC WILL SUPPORT PRIVACY PROTECTION PLANS
OPT-IN PRIVACY PROPOSALS ARE EFFECTIVE
DISADVANTAGE ANSWERS
PRIVACY REGULATIONS WILL NOT HURT BUSINESS
UNLESS PRIVACY IS PROTECTED NOW THE INTERNET WILL BE REGULATED OUT OF EXISTENCE IN THE FUTURE
CYBERSPACE MUST BE REGULATED IN ORDER TO REMAIN FREE
AFFIRMATIVE BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CASE
BANKING & FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS — INHERENCY
BANKING & FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS — SIGNIFICANCE
BANKING & FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS — SOLVENCY
BANKING & FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS — DISADVANTAGE ANSWERS
OTHER AFFIRMATIVE CASES
FIGHTING ONLINE CRIME HURTS PRIVACY
COMPUTERS IN SCHOOL HURT PRIVACY
NEGATIVE INTERNET CONSUMER ARGUMENTS
NEGATIVE SIGNIFICANCE ARGUMENTS
CONSUMER INFORMATION GATHERING IS NOT A THREAT TO PRIVACY
PEOPLE ARE READY AND WILLING TO GIVE UP PERSONAL INFORMATION AS CONSUMERS
SURVEY RESULTS ABOUT CONSUMER PRIVACY ARE MEANINGLESS
CONSUMERS GET HUGE BENEFITS FROM OPEN INFORMATION
TRADITIONAL COMMUNICATIVE CONCEPTS DO NOT APPLY IN CYBERSPACE
NO SIGNIFICANCE TO ERRORS IN DATABASES
THREATS TO INTERNET SECURITY ARE EXAGGERATED
NEGATIVE INHERENCY ARGUMENTS
INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN ACTION CAN PROTECT PRIVACY
NEW SOFTWARE ALLOWS INDIVIDUAL CONSUMERS TO PROTECT PRIVACY
P3P SOFTWARE CAN PROTECT PRIVACY
INFOMEDIARIES SOLVE — PEOPLE CAN "SELL" THEIR INFORMATION
RAPID PRIVACY PROGRESS IS BEING MADE ON THE INTERNET NOW
IT WILL BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF BUSINESS TO RESPECT PRIVACY, SO THEY WILL
THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION PROTECTS ONLINE PRIVACY
PUBLIC OPINION WILL LEAD TO NEW FEDERAL PROTECTIONS
CREDIT REPORTING LAWS PROTECT PRIVACY
PRIVACY FOR CHILDREN IS PROTECTED
NEGATIVE SOLVENCY ARGUMENTS
TECHNOLOGY PREVENTS PRIVACY PROTECTION
THE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERNET PREVENTS PRIVACY PROTECTION
OPT-IN PROPOSALS ARE UNDESIRABLE
OPT-OUT PROPOSALS ARE UNDESIRABLE
NEGATIVE — CONSUMER/INTERNET — BANKING — GENERAL
NEGATIVE DISADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGE SHELL: PRIVACY PROTECTION SEVERELY DAMAGES THE NEW ECONOMY
DISADVANTAGE SHELL: PRIVACY PROTECTIONS KILL THE INTERNET
IMPACT: SOCIAL REFORM AND KNOWLEDGE
OTHER DISADVANTAGES
STOPPING PROFILING HURTS CONSUMERS
DAMAGES FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND BANKS WHEN APPLIED TO THEM