A cost transfer is the assignment of an expense to a sponsored agreement that was initially recorded elsewhere in the University’s general ledger. A cost transfer from a sponsored agreement to a non-sponsored budget is also considered a cost transfer. Examples are a retrospective payroll distribution change or a journal entry which moves an existing non-payroll expense from one sponsored agreement to another sponsored agreement.
Purcard reallocations, inter-departmental billings (IC journal entries), and recoding of expenses on the same sponsored project are not considered a cost transfer. Examples of recoding of expenses are:
- A retrospective salary distribution change which maintains the same total percentage of effort on a sponsored project but changes the fund, source and function chartfields to charge part or all of the effort to a cost share chartstring.
- A correction to an expense account to properly classify the expense on the same project.
Applying the four cost principles in the University's Cost Policy (PDF) to assess whether an expense is appropriate or not on a sponsored agreement, conducting quarterly effort planning sessions to prospectively allocate payroll correctly the first time, and using advance accounts to charge appropriate expenses prior to the sponsor funding the sponsored agreement are important business practices to minimize cost transfers.
No. A sponsored agreement may not be used as a holding account for expenses that will subsequently be transferred to another sponsored agreement. All expenses must meet the costing standards of being allocable, allowable, reasonable, and consistently applied in order to be charged to a sponsored agreement. Business practices such as requesting an Advance Account or temporarily charging the encumbrances/expenses to a department suspense account are appropriate methods.
Payroll cost transfers and non-payroll cost transfers have different processes, documentation requirements, and a different central unit that reviews/approves these two types of cost transfers.
External auditors view cost transfers involving sponsored agreements as a potential internal controls issue. Cost transfers are more rigorously challenged by auditors. A justification with adequate documentation which incorporates sufficient internal controls provide a robust framework to meet the costing standards required by the University's sponsors.
The justification must include a detailed explanation from which an independent reviewer can understand the transfer request and conclude that the expense is appropriate. A statement that merely states “to correct error” or “to transfer to correct account” is not sufficient.
Federal regulations require that no one person has complete control over the all aspects of a financial transaction. To comply with this requirement, the preparer of the cost transfer request and the unit person approving the cost transfer request may not be the same person.
The cost transfer form accommodates the following cost transfer approval scenarios at the University.
- A Dean's office may require approval of cost transfer requests
- A PI may want to approve cost transfer requests which affect their sponsored agreements
- For untimely cost transfer requests, the Cost Transfer UOP requires the PI receiving the expense on their respective sponsored agreement to approve the appropriateness of the cost transfer.
- For untimely cost transfer requests, the Cost Transfer UOP requires a vice president to approve the extenuating circumstances and the unit's corrective action plan to prevent future occurrences.
If a unit submits a cost transfer request more than 90 days after the original accounting date of the oldest expense being transferred, the cost transfer is considered untimely.
The hourly time submission process in PeopleSoft's time and labor system allocates someone's time and related wages. When the employee submits and the supervisor approves, the time is certified as reasonable in relation to work performed on sponsored agreements. A wage transfer request involving a sponsored agreement is a re-certification of how the time was allocated. A signature from someone who has firsthand knowledge or suitable means of verification is required to certify the reasonableness of the revised allocation of time. Typically, the employee signature is obtained.