Sustainability Metrics FAQ
Can we shuffle PIs on these grants?
Members of the team who were co-PIs or key personnel on the planning grants can assume the role of PI if the team realizes this is their best path forward. Members who were NOT members of the planning grants cannot join the team as PIs.
Can I do a rebudget?
No, rebudgets are not allowed on the planning grants.
Why is the PI minimum effort 6%?
In an effort to ensure work performed in reflective on time allocated, we have a minimum of 6% effort for PIs. This 6% effort translates to 2.4 hours/week on this project and also includes the mentorship of the postdoctoral fellow that is included in the award. Mentoring an early career scientist is an important part of these grants and adequate time allocation is critical to ensuring their mentorship is sufficient. PIs, in consult with their Chair, can request additional funding for themselves to buy out some time as long as the 6% minimum is met.
Why do I have to hire a postdoctoral fellow?
The requirement of a postdoctoral fellow is a deliberate effort and decision by the FSRC and ARS. Because the sustainability metrics grants are fundamentally an effort to advance the initial framework from our two institutions, we expect collaboration and coordination throughout the grant cycle. The postdoctoral fellows are expected to have a role in this facilitation to help form cohesion and collaboration among and between projects. This is based on our Dairy Science postdoc cohort, which has proven to have great success in fostering a collaborative environment across their projects with both UVM and ARS scientists.
Who will review our applications?
The review process is TBD, but tenatively the applications will be reviewed by members of the UVM FSRC, UVM faculty not affiliated with any projects, and scientists who experts in the broad fields of agriculture, food, and sustainability. Members of the USDA's ARS team at UVM may provide insights as well.
Will working with other teams be looked on favorably?
The nature of this work is collaborative. We fully support teams to work together.
What happens if we are working with another team that is not funded but we are?
This is very possible. It may be wiser to wait until after the winners are determined to form collaborative teams across projects. As a reminder, the postdoctoral fellows will act as links between the projects.
Can you clarify what the following items mean in the RFP: standardized ways to assess these tradeoffs, and determine how tradeoffs influence the metrics that could be used in their project and proposed data ontology?
On the tradeoffs, we are looking for how projects are thinking about tensions between metrics, and how we might actually be able to assess those tradeoffs in ways that are more than just observational or anecdotal. This could be a way of standardizing units of analysis for example, or at least ratios across metrics as an example.
On the data ontology, this is the set of terms and formal naming and definitions of different data collected. One of the things we anticipate with these projects, both within a single project, and especially across projects, is that there will be discrepancy on terms and definitions. How will your team work to define terms, especially across areas and disciplines? This is also an important outcome for the broader goal of this work, which is not to fund individual projects only, but to move towards the advancement of a framework of metrics and indicators that can be applied in food systems across scales, dimensions, etc.
Can I include references in my proposal? If I do, does a reference page count in my page limit?
You can include references and the reference page will NOT count against your limit.
What geographic scope are you hoping for?
Vermont should be the first focus, but broadly we are hoping for the winner to engage with the broad New England region
Can we wiggle with the budget a little bit?
Yes, you have 10% wiggle room with the $200K award. You must detail what you will spend money on in your budget document.
Can we do virtual meetings four our listening tour?
Virtual formats cab leave out some important groups of people—especially in rural states including a large amount of low-income, older, and underserved communities who may have internet speed and access issues. So we would prefer in-person events when possible. However, do we understand that sometimes virtual options work the best for a given audience. As an FYI, the expectation is for these workshops to engage ~400 people