Electronic
Scavenger Hunt |
0
pts. Not completed
by the beginning of class, Monday, September 16 |
------- |
5
pts. Completed
and handed in by the beginning of class, Monday, September 16
|
|
1st
Teaching Episode
The
purpose of the 1st & 2nddf Teaching Episode Projects is
to use ELED coursework to develop portfolio entries that will
meet the requirements for state standard #1 Teaching Episodes.
This standard asks that you provide two examples of your work
with children. The 1st and 2nd Teaching Episode Projects can
be used to serve as those examples.
For
help thinking about captioning go to: http://www.uvm.edu/ ~rathbon/
188captioncrit.html.
|
0
pts.
1st Teaching Episode
is not handed in to Jim by 10/7.
Teacher or student
work is not provided.
Captioning is unrelated
to documentation.
Context is not established.
Student work is not
assessed.
Evidence + captioning
does not "meet standards" as described in the rubric
for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.
|
8.3
pts.
1st Teaching Episode
completed and handed in by the beginning of class, Monday, 9/30.
Minimal teacher or
student work is included.
It is unclear how
the selection of student and/or teacher work is purposeful or
relevant to the captioning.
Minimal captioning
is provided to establish the context of the teacher and student
work.
Evidence of student
learning is weakly addressed in the captioning.
Evidence + captioning
does not address (does not "meet standard") for one or more of
the sub-criteria described in the rubric for state standard #1,
Teaching Episodes. |
10
pts.
1st Teaching Episode
completed and handed in at the beginning of class, Monday, Septermber
23.
The entry presents
a selection of teacher work and student work.
This work is captioned,
i.e., explained.
Some captioning must
establish the context of the lesson documented.
Some captioning must
explicitly address evidence for children's learning from the lesson
(i.e. assessment).
Some captioning must
make clear how the evidence provided "meets standards" in
all instances (all rows or sub criteria) described in the rubric
for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes. |
|
2nd Teaching
Episode
The
2nd Teaching Episode project is identical to the 1st Teaching
Episode Project (see above) except for one additional requirement:
Evidence must be provided for at least one program criterion
and be clearly identified as such.
|
0
pts.
1st Teaching Episode
is not handed in to Jim by 10/7.
Teacher or student
work is not provided.
Captioning is unrelated
to documentation.
Context is not established.
Student work is not
assessed.
Evidence + captioning
does not "meet standards" as described in the rubric
for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.
Evidence for at least
one program criterion is not provided. |
12.45
pts.
2nd Teaching Episode
completed and handed in by the beginning of class, Monday, 10/28.
Minimal teacher or
student work is included.
It is unclear how
the selection of student and/or teacher work is purposeful or
relevant to the captioning.
Minimal captioning
is provided to establish the context of the teacher and student
work.
Evidence of student
learning is weakly addressed in the captioning.
Evidence + captioning
does not address (does not "meet standard") for one or more of
the sub-criteria described in the rubric for state standard #1,
Teaching Episodes.
Evidence for at least
one program criterion is not clearly identified as such. |
15
pts.
2nd Teaching Episode
completed and handed in at the beginning of class, Monday, October
21.
The entry presents
a selection of teacher work and student work.
This work is captioned,
i.e., explained.
Some captioning must
establish the context of the lesson documented.
Some captioning must
explicitly address evidence for children's learning from the lesson
(i.e. assessment).
Some captioning must
make clear how the evidence provided "meets standards" in
all instances (all rows or sub criteria) described in the rubric
for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.
Evidence must be provided
for at least one program criterion and be clearly identified as
such. |
|
Draft Table of Contents
|
0
pts. Draft
table of contents is not handed in by 12/9/02.
No organization is
exhibited by the use of headings.
|
4.15
pts. Draft
table of contents is handed in by the start of class, 12/02.
Table of contents
exhibits some organization by use of headings.
No title is provided
for the portfolio. |
5
pts. Draft
table of contents is handed in at the beginning of class, Monday,
November 18.
Table of contents
is organized by headings, sub-headings, and entry headings.
A title for the portfolio
is included. |
|
Completed Portfolio
|
30
pts. The portfolio
is not handed in on 12/12 nor is a later date negotiated with
Jim. |
41.50
pts. The portfolio
is handed in at a later date than 12/12, negotiated with Jim.
|
50
pts. On 12/12
the completed portfolio is brought to interviewand celebration
at the Manor. |