Course Overview

EDEL 189 Syllabus

Evaluation

Agendas & Follow-up

Questions for Jim

Downloads

 

 
EDEL 189: Portfolio Development & the Reflective Practioner
Fall, 2002

Rubric for Evaluation of Course Projects

Course Component

Below Standard
('F' )

Meets Standard ('B')
Exceeds Standard ('A')
Attendance & Punctuality

0 pts.

Absent 4 or more times

9 pts.

Frequently absent or late (3 times)

12.45 pts.

Sometimes abasent (1-2 times)

15 pts.

0 times absent or late

 

Electronic 
Scavenger Hunt
0 pts.

Not completed by the beginning of class, Monday, September 16

-------
5 pts.

Completed and handed in by the beginning of class, Monday, September 16

1st Teaching Episode

The purpose of the 1st & 2nddf Teaching Episode Projects is to use ELED coursework to develop portfolio entries that will meet the requirements for state standard #1 Teaching Episodes. This standard asks that you provide two examples of your work with children. The 1st and 2nd Teaching Episode Projects can be used to serve as those examples.

 

For help thinking about captioning go to: http://www.uvm.edu/ ~rathbon/
188captioncrit.html.

0 pts.

1st Teaching Episode is not handed in to Jim by 10/7.

Teacher or student work is not provided.

Captioning is unrelated to documentation.

Context is not established.

Student work is not assessed.

Evidence + captioning does not "meet standards" as described in the rubric for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.
 

8.3 pts.

1st Teaching Episode completed and handed in by the beginning of class, Monday, 9/30.

Minimal teacher or student work is included.

It is unclear how the selection of student and/or teacher work is purposeful or relevant to the captioning.

Minimal captioning is provided to establish the context of the teacher and student work.

Evidence of student learning is weakly addressed in the captioning.

Evidence + captioning does not address (does not "meet standard") for one or more of the sub-criteria described in the rubric for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.

10 pts.

1st Teaching Episode completed and handed in at the beginning of class, Monday, Septermber 23.

The entry presents a selection of teacher work and student work.

This work is captioned, i.e., explained.

Some captioning must establish the context of the lesson documented.

Some captioning must explicitly address evidence for children's learning from the lesson (i.e. assessment).

Some captioning must make clear how the evidence provided "meets  standards" in all instances (all rows or sub criteria) described in the rubric for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.

2nd Teaching Episode

The 2nd Teaching Episode project is identical to the 1st Teaching Episode Project (see above) except for one additional requirement: Evidence must be provided for at least one program criterion and be clearly identified as such.

0 pts.

1st Teaching Episode is not handed in to Jim by 10/7.

Teacher or student work is not provided.

Captioning is unrelated to documentation.

Context is not established.

Student work is not assessed.

Evidence + captioning does not "meet standards" as described in the rubric for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.

Evidence for at least one program criterion is not provided.

12.45 pts.

2nd Teaching Episode completed and handed in by the beginning of class, Monday, 10/28.

Minimal teacher or student work is included.

It is unclear how the selection of student and/or teacher work is purposeful or relevant to the captioning.

Minimal captioning is provided to establish the context of the teacher and student work.

Evidence of student learning is weakly addressed in the captioning.

Evidence + captioning does not address (does not "meet standard") for one or more of the sub-criteria described in the rubric for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.

Evidence for at least one program criterion is not clearly identified as such.

15 pts.

2nd Teaching Episode completed and handed in at the beginning of class, Monday, October 21.

The entry presents a selection of teacher work and student work.

This work is captioned, i.e., explained.

Some captioning must establish the context of the lesson documented.

Some captioning must explicitly address evidence for children's learning from the lesson (i.e. assessment).

Some captioning must make clear how the evidence provided "meets  standards" in all instances (all rows or sub criteria) described in the rubric for state standard #1, Teaching Episodes.

Evidence must be provided for at least one program criterion and be clearly identified as such.

Draft Table of Contents
0 pts. 

Draft table of contents is not handed in by 12/9/02.

No organization is exhibited by the use of headings.

 

4.15 pts.

Draft table of contents is handed in by the start of class, 12/02.

Table of contents exhibits some organization by use of headings.

No title is provided for the portfolio.

5 pts.

Draft table of contents is handed in at the beginning of class, Monday, November 18.

Table of contents is organized by headings, sub-headings, and entry headings.

A title for the portfolio is included.

Completed Portfolio
30 pts.

The portfolio is not handed in on 12/12 nor is a later date negotiated with Jim.

41.50 pts.

The portfolio is handed in at a later date than 12/12, negotiated with Jim.

50 pts.

On 12/12 the completed portfolio is brought to interviewand celebration at the Manor.

Copyright 2002 L. M. Gelles
All Rights Reserved