Michele Rivkin-Fish
2003
Communism and its Afterlife:
Post-Mortems, Memories, Mutations
The ideological framework known as “The Cold War” bifurcated the world into extreme antinomies—totalitarianism vs. democracy; authoritarianism vs. freedom; planned economy vs. the market; state control vs. civil society—providing a conceptual lens that shaped American public consciousness no less than the public policies of nation-states worldwide. Since 1991, the dominant narrative of the end of that era positions the West as “victor,” and the East as scrambling on a linear trajectory to “catch up” with the West. This evolutionary schema is captured most vividly in the notion that former socialist states are currently undergoing “the transition” to capitalism and democracy. Yet recent scholarship has begun to subject such accounts to critical scrutiny. On the one hand, we are coming to recognize the need to understand similarities between East and West, such as their common use of modern forms of power, utopian beliefs in science and industrialization, and rhetorical focus on mass sovereignty in ways that obscured the limitations placed on local, grassroots power. On another level, scholars have shown that there is no single, evolutionary path of post-Communist “transition.” It is crucial to explore the diverse paths of change occurring in both East and West as local communities respond to neo-liberalism, globalization, and national forces aiming to reconstruct collective identities.
To pursue such goals, this course examines the production of collective memory and forgetting as they play out in interpretations of communism and post-communist change. How do narratives of what communism was, and what its demise has meant, shape the everyday consciousness of Eastern Europeans and Westerners? How are civic organizations, the state, Church, and private people remembering the socialist era and commemorating specific events associated with it? How does the experience of communism fit into national identities, and/or how is it being ignored or erased as part of the post-communist “transition”?
The semester begins by examining the ways communism has been depicted and remembered locally and globally through the genres of historical representation, ethnography, fiction, and film. We then explore how visions of what communism was (and was not) have shaped recent images of reform, re-imaginings of society, and “progress.” Finally, we examine new, neoliberal utopias of transcendence, the ways they have selectively used collective memory for some purposes and generated emerging rituals of transition for others.
Travel Component:
As participants in the Bingham Seminar, we are fortunate to
have the opportunity to extend our studies beyond the classroom and travel to
two former socialist settings to observe and experience life after communism.
Our trip will include five major cities in
REQUIREMENTS:
1) Consistent attendance and active participation are required. Thoughtful participation counts for 15% of your grade.
2) An oral presentation summarizing the readings and raising questions to consider in our class discussion. This may be done in cooperation with one other student. Please write out discussion questions and email them to me at least 24 hours prior to our class meeting; I will copy and distribute them to all students at the start of class. In addition, a written précis is to be prepared in advance and used as the basis for class discussion. (20% of grade.)
3) An oral presentation in week 13 or 14 on the research topic of your final paper. (10% of grade).
4) A final paper (approx. 15 pages) on a topic of your choosing, due Thursday, April 27, in class (30% of grade). For many weeks of our semester, I have added
to the syllabus one or more readings under the label, “reference.” These are suggested readings for students who would like to pursue the topic further, perhaps for their final project. I am happy to offer additional suggestions on these or other topics.
4)
A final essay (approximately 10 pages) that draws on your travel journal
entries and further reflects on how your tour to
Introduction
Week 1 Marxist Visions and Theories:
Communism as ‘Emancipation’
Marx, Karl Manifesto of the Communist Party (from
Tucker, ed. The Marx-Engels Reader.)
Susan Buck Morss,
2000. On Time (Part II of Dreamworld and
Catastrophe).
Week 2 Anti-Marxist Critiques from Within:
Revolution as ‘Violence’
Mikhail Bulgakov, 1968
Heart of a Dog trans. Mirra Ginsburg. NY: Grove Press.
Excerpts from the
film, Sobach’e Serdtse (1988 Russian
language film, Heart of a Dog)
Reference: Nina Tumarkin, 1983. Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet
Week 3 Stalinism and Local Memory
Solzhenitsyn, Alexander
1995. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, translated from the Russian by H.T. Willetts,
Vyssotsky,
Reference: Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago, The Gulag Archipelago,
1918-1956; an experiment in literary investigation [by] Aleksandr I.
Solzhenitsyn. Translated from the Russian by Thomas P. Whitney.
Mandelstam, Natalia.
Hope Beyond Hope
Ginzburg, Evgeniia Semenovna, 1967. Journey into the Whirlwind.
Translated by Paul Stevenson and Max Hayward
Week 4 Stalinism: Western Representations
and Debates
Burbank, Jane 1991.
Controversies over Stalinism: Searching for a Soviet Society. Politics and Society 19(3):325-340.
Merridale, Catherine. 2001. Night of Stone: Death and Memory in Twentieth Century Russia Viking
Press (selections).
Film, The Manchurian Candidate
Reference: Applebaum, Anne 2003. Gulag:
A History Doubleday.
Week 5 Eastern European Responses: “Living
in Truth”
Czeslaw Milosz,
1953 The Captive Mind (selections)
Havel, Vaclev, 1992.
“The Power of the Powerless” in Open
Letters: Selected Writings 1965-1990. NY: Vintage Books.
Reference: Stokes, Gale. 1996. From
Stalinism to Pluralism: A Documentary History of Eastern Europe Since 1945,
Second Edition (
Stokes, Gale. 1993.
The Walls Came Tumbling Down: The
Collapse of Communism in
Week 6 Minorities and the Collective Self:
Representation, Memory, and National Identity
Irwin-Zarecka, Iwona
1989. Neutralizing Memory: The Jew in Contemporary
Lemon, Alaina 2000. Between
Two Fires: Gypsy Performance and Romani Memory from Pushkin to Postsocialism
Duke University Press. (Introduction, Chapters 3, 4, 5)
Film: The Nasty Girl
Reference: Yuri Slezkine, The
Week 7 The Making of “Transition” in
Kubik, 1994. The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of
Power.
Buchkowski, Michal.
2001. Rethinking Transformation: An
Anthropological Perspective on Post-Socialism.
Week 8 Changing Symbols of State and Nation
Kathleen E. Smith, 2003. “Conflict over
Designing a Monument to Stalin’s Victims” in Architectures of Russian Identity,
eds. James Cracraft and Daniel Rowland.
Bruce Grant, 2001.
New
Ashton, Dore, 1996.
Monumental Propaganda. NY:
Independent Curators Incorporated (selections by Komar and Melamid).
Reference:
Verdery, Katherine.
1998. The Political Lives of
Borneman, John. 1992.
Belonging in the Two
Week 9 Negotiating Memory and Identity in Moments
of Change
Slavenka Drakulic,
1996. Café Europa. NY: Penguin.
Reference: Ten Dyke, Elizabeth 2000. Memory, History, and Remembrance Work in
Hermine de. Soto
2000. Contested Landscapes: Reconstructing Environment and Memory in
Postsocialist Saxony-Anhalt Altering
States: Ethnographies of Transition in Eastern Europe and the Former
Film: Sweet Emma, Dear Bobe
Week 10 Reconsidering “Transition”: The Rise
and Fall of Utopias, East and West
Buck-Morss, Susan, 2000. Dreamworld and
Catastrophe,
Week 11 ‘Transition’ in New American Utopias
I: American Interpretive Frames
Cohen, Stephen, 2000. Failed Crusade:
OR
Wedel, Janine W.
2001. Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to
AND
Bohlman, Philip V.
2000. To Hear the Voices Still Heard: On Synagogue Restoration in Eastern
Europe Altering States: Ethnographies of Transition
in Eastern Europe and the Former
Week 12 Transition in American Fantasies:
Post-Communist
Beckman, John. 2002 The
Winter Zoo NY: Henry Holt and Co.
Week 13 Student Presentations
Week 14 Student Presentations