home

Office of Health Promotion Research

OHPR Abstract 245

Abstract 2000-2008

Trumbo CW, McComas KA. The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Anal. 2003 Apr;23(2):343-53. [Missouri School of Journalism, The University of Missouri, 181E Gannett Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.]

This study examines how credibility affects the way people process information and how they subsequently perceive risk. Three conceptual areas are brought together in this analysis: the psychometric model of risk perception, Eagly and Chaiken's heuristic-systematic information processing model, and Meyer's credibility index. Data come from a study of risk communication in the circumstance of state health department investigations of suspected cancer clusters (five cases, N = 696). Credibility is assessed for three information sources: state health departments, citizen groups, and industries involved in each case. Higher credibility for industry and the state directly predicts lower risk perception, whereas high credibility for citizen groups predicts greater risk perception. A path model shows that perceiving high credibility for industry and state-and perceiving low credibility for citizen groups-promotes heuristic processing, which in turn is a strong predictor of lower risk perception. Alternately, perceiving industry and the state to have low credibility also promotes greater systematic processing, which consistently leads to perception of greater risk. Between a one-fifth and one-third of the effect of credibility on risk perception is shown to be indirectly transmitted through information processing.

Last modified September 16 2013 04:10 PM

Contact UVM © 2014 The University of Vermont - Burlington, VT 05405 - (802) 656-3131