Evaluation
 |
Beginning D
|
Developing C
|
Accomplished B
|
Exemplary A
|
Score
|
Score Possible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demonstrates knowledge about
wolf resettlement in Vermont |
Has no information about
current state of wolves in VT |
Has little evidence of wolves
in VT and some is incorrect |
Has some evidence about the
state of wolves in Vermont but
most is dated and about other states. |
Has a well documented
knowledge of state of wolf population
and issues in VT |
10 points | |
| Can discuss perspective of
role using reliable and current research data. |
Can't discuss perspective of role selected and has no research based evidence. | Demonstrates little empathy
for role selected. Has only
a couple of biased resources as research |
Can argue perspective but has
little research or few resources
that align to arguments stated. |
Even though personally may not
support this perspective, can
argue perspective using reliable resources. |
20 points |
|
| Use of resources |
No resources used |
Uses only a few resources supplied by instructor | Uses only resources supplied
by instructor |
Uses resources provided by
instructor but also resources found in own research of topic |
20 points | |
| Final Project |
Position is not well supported and does not reflect any use of evidence. Only word processing with no graphics or links | Position is supported but only
word processed document with
only clip art used |
Position is supported using
multimedia to present information
to the group but only clip art and no links used. |
Position is well
supported and an interesting
multimedia presentation is used to convince group of our point of view.
Includes pictures and linked resources |
50 points |
Here are some
examples of individual presentations students have created in past
years:
Gray Wolf Inn
Wolf Reintroduction.ppt
A Farmer's Perspective.ppt
Group Rubric for Building
Consensus Product
Gray Wolf Inn
Wolf Reintroduction.ppt
A Farmer's Perspective.ppt
| Evaluation
|
Beginning D
|
Developing C
|
Accomplished B
|
Exemplary A
|
Score
|
Score Possible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared work load in setting up
discussion area and resources |
No participation |
Participation is rare and not
evident |
Participation is much less
than others and doesn't respond to
prompts from others in group |
Good participation and helps
others in figuring out how to
set up a Blog and invite their group and professor Morris into it |
10 points | |
| Responds to other perspective
using reliable and current research data. |
Can't discuss perspective of role selected and has no research based evidence. | Demonstrates little empathy
for role selected. Has only
a couple of biased resources as research |
Can argue perspective but has
little research or resources
that align to arguments stated. |
Even though personally may not
support this perspective, can
argue perspective using reliable resources. |
20 points |
|
| Participation in group
discussion: |
Rarely responds to others in
the group |
Responds to others in the
group but without evidence |
Responds to others and uses
little or unreliable evidence. |
Responds promptly to others in
group using factual information. |
20 Points |
|
| Participates in group
consensus building |
Rarely participates in consensus building | Does not make any compromises in consensus building | Participates in consensus building but just gives in without defending point of view | Participates in consensus building and compromises while considering own point of view | 25 points |
|
| Shared work load for final
project |
No participation in final product | Provided some feedback but added no information to final document | Provided feedback but added little information to final | Provided feedback to others and was an active participant in developing final document. | 25 points |
|| Introduction || Task || Process || Resources || Evaluation || Conclusion || Credits || Teachers' Page ||