Draft
Course Syllabus CDAE 295, 395, NR 385, MPA 395
Agroecology, Farmer
Livelihoods and Ecosystem Services
in Brazil's Atlantic Forest
Spring, 2015
Instructors: Joshua Farley and
Juan Alvez, UVM
Abdon
Schmitt-Filho (agroecologist); Alfredo Fantini (Forester); Ilyas Siddique
(agroecologist) the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
E-Mails : Joshua.Farley@uvm.edu,
juan.alvez@uvm.edu
Web Page www.uvm.edu/~jfarley/Agroeco
(NOT YET LAUNCHED)
BrazilŐs
Atlantic Forest, one of the highest diversity terrestrial ecosystems on the
planet, has been reduced to less than 10% of its original extent, resulting in
the degradation of ecosystem services that are vitally important to the
two-thirds of BrazilŐs population living within its original borders. Recent years have seen a dramatic
increase in devastating floods and landslides that have been attributed in part
to deforestation. Ecologists estimate
that failure to restore forest cover to 30% of the ecosystem will result in
ecological collapse. The Brazilian forestry code formerly mandated restoration
of ecologically important areas such as riparian zones plus an additional 20%
of Atlantic Forest properties, which would result in approximately 30% Forest
cover. However, many small family
farmers in the coastal mountains of Santa Catarina state would lose so much
arable land if they complied with this law that they would be forced into poverty.
In 2009, the governor of Santa Catarina declared that the state would no longer
obey the national forestry code, which set off a national debate and triggered federal
legislation to weaken the code. Much of this legislation was vetoed by the
President, but the code was nonetheless weakened, and there is an ongoing
debate about further weakening the code. With current agricultural
technologies, BrazilŐs goals of forest restoration, economic growth and poverty
alleviation appear to be in direct conflict.
This
situation has profound global importance.
Both agricultural production and healthy ecosystems are essential to
human survival, yet agriculture is among the greatest threats to global
ecosystems. From an economic
perspective, the marginal ecological costs of agriculture are immeasurably
high, while to the one billion malnourished individuals, the marginal benefits
of additional food are also immeasurable.
In economic terms, this translates into supply and demand curves that do
not intersect. Global society must
develop new agricultural technologies and economic institutions to address this
problem.
This
transdisciplinary, problem-based service-learning course involving faculty and
students from UVM and the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) will
contribute to an ongoing project intended to develop and disseminate an
agroecological silvopastoral system using native species that is capable of
improving the livelihoods of small family farmers while restoring degraded
forests and the ecosystem services that they generate. Our goal is to contribute to careful
scientific comparisons of the ecological and economic impacts of conventional
and agro-ecological farming systems, and to the design of economic policies
(with an emphasis on payments for ecosystem services) that support the
development and dissemination of sustainable agricultural practices. In
preparation for the field experience, we will review the progress that has been
made on the project, and explore the ecological, economic, political and social
context. We will then review and select appropriate methods for conducting
baseline assessments of ecological and economic conditions in areas where we
plan to implement pilot silvopastoral projects. During the field portion of the
course in coastal Santa Catarina, we will initiate these baseline
assessments. The project takes
place in one of the most beautiful, friendly and safe regions in Brazil.
By
their very nature, problem-based courses must be flexible. Our precise field
activities will depend on the schedules of local participants, weather, project
demands, changes in the Brazilian policy debates, support from government
ministries, and a variety of other factors. Classroom material will be adapted to
these constraints.
This
course is part of an ongoing project with Brazilian partners that is intended
to help address one of the most serious problems facing human society. You will be interacting extensively wth
Brazilian professors, students, farmers, agricultural co-operatives and/or
local politicians. We have high
expectations for your role as researchers/problem-solvers and your role as
cultural ambassadors to Brazil. In
terms of academics, we expect you not only to conduct professional quality
research, but also to communicate your results in one of three formats, all
publication quality: an internal project document that carefully describes the
problem you are addressing, specific objectives, field work methods for
achieving those objectives, and results; an article for submission to a peer
reviewed journals; or an editorial for local or national newspapers related to
general course themes. In our
experience, the work of writing a journal article is unlikely to end when the
semester ends, but also contributes far more to your CV and to science than a
typical course. You will also be asked to write periodic reflections.
Maturity and professionalism: 15%
Reflections: 15%
Working group contracts and peer evaluations: 5%
Final course project: 30%
Final presentations: 10%
This grading scheme may be modified if
required.
In
this course we pre-select only core texts.
Working groups will be responsible for extensive literature reviews on
their specific topics.
General Introduction to the problem
De Schutter, O., 2010. Report submitted by the Special
Rapporteur on the right to food. United Nations Human Right Council, NY.
Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy,
E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N.D., O/'Connell, C., Ray, D.K.,
West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C.,
Polasky, S., Rockstrom, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., Zaks, D.P.M.,
2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337-342.
Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A.,
Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber,
H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H.,
Sorlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg,
L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D.,
Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J.A., 2009. A safe operating space for
humanity. Nature 461, 472-475.
Introduction to agroecology (suggested by
Ernesto Mendez)
Mndez, V.E., C.M. Bacon and R. Cohen (Guest Editors) (2013).
Agroecology and the transformation of
agri-food systems: Transdisciplinary and participatory perspectives. Invited
Special Inaugural Issue
of Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37(1) http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjsa21/37/1
Wezel, A., S. Bellon, T. Dore, C. Francis, D. Vallod
& C. David (2009) Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A
review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 503-515.
Mndez, V. E. (2010). Agroecology. In B. Warf
(Ed.), Encyclopedia of Geography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (in
press).
Altieri, M.A. and V.M. Toledo (2011). The
agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food
sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies 38(3):
587-612.
Case study readings
Farley, J., Schmitt Filho, A., 2012. Ecosystem
Services, Agriculture, and Economic Institutions., in: Brouwer, M. (Ed.), The
Ecosystem Promise. Partner in communications and sustainable development,
Bunnik, the Netherlands.
Farley, J., Schmitt Filho, A., Alvez, J.P., Rebola,
P.M., 2010. The farmerŐs viewpoint: Payments for ecosystem services and
agroecologic pasture based dairy production. Advances in Animal Biosciences 1,
490-491.
Farley, J., Schmitt Filho, A., Juan Alvez, Ribeiro de
Freitas, N., Jr., 2012. How Valuing Nature Can Transform Agriculture. Solutions
2, 64-73.
Schmitt F., A., Farley, J., Alarcon, G., Alvez, J.,
Rebollar, P., 2013. Integrating Agroecology with Payments for Ecosystem
Services in Santa CatarinaŐs Atlantic Forest, in: Muradian, R., Rival, L.
(Eds.), Governing the provision of environmental services Springer.
Schmitt F., A., Murphy, W., Farley, J., 2010. Grass
based agroecologic dairying to revitalize small family farms through student
technical support: The development of a participative methodology responsible
for 622 family farm projects. Advances in Animal Biosciences 1, 517-518.
Field methods
Jeanes, K., Noordwijk, M.v., Joshi, L., Widayati, A.,
Leimona, F., Leimona, B., 2006. Rapid Hydrological Appraisal in the context of
environmental service rewards. , in: World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, S.R.O.
(Ed.), Bogor, Indonesia.
Kuncoro, S.A., Noordwijk, M.v., Martini, E.,
Saipothong, P., Areskoug, V., Putra, A.E., O'Connor, T., 2006. Rapid
Agrobiodiversity Appraisal (RABA) in the Context of Environmental Service
Rewards. World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor, Indonesia.
van Noordwijk, M., 2008. Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal
(RaCSA): a rapid but integrated way to assess landscape carbon stock, in: World
Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, S.R.O. (Ed.), Bogor, Indonesia.
Week |
Topics |
Readings |
1 |
Introduction to the
global conflict between agriculture and ecosystem services |
De Schutter, O.,
2010. Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. United
Nations Human Right Council, NY. Foley, J.A.,
Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M.,
Mueller, N.D., O/'Connell, C., Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett,
E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockstrom, J.,
Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., Zaks, D.P.M., 2011. Solutions for a
cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337-342. Rockstrom, J.,
Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton,
T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A.,
Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza,
R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J.,
Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley,
J.A., 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472-475. |
2 |
Introduction to the
Brazilian case study; Organize initial working groups: agronomy, ecology,
social sciences. Outline for web-site |
To be chosen from: Grant proposal
(PVE) Schmitt
F., A., Farley, J., Alarcon, G., Alvez, J., Rebollar, P., 2013. Integrating
Agroecology with Payments for Ecosystem Services in Santa CatarinaŐs Atlantic
Forest, in: Muradian, R., Rival, L. (Eds.), Governing the provision of
environmental services Springer. Farley, J., Schmitt
Filho, A., 2012. Ecosystem Services, Agriculture, and Economic Institutions.,
in: Brouwer, M. (Ed.), The Ecosystem Promise. Partner in communications and
sustainable development, Bunnik, the Netherlands. Farley, J., Schmitt
Filho, A., Alvez, J.P., Rebola, P.M., 2010. The farmerŐs viewpoint: Payments
for ecosystem services and agroecologic pasture based dairy production.
Advances in Animal Biosciences 1, 490-491. Farley, J., Schmitt
Filho, A., Juan Alvez, Ribeiro de Freitas, N., Jr., 2012. How Valuing Nature
Can Transform Agriculture. Solutions 2, 64-73. Schmitt F., A.,
Murphy, W., Farley, J., 2010. Grass based agroecologic dairying to revitalize
small family farms through student technical support: The development of a
participative methodology responsible for 622 family farm projects. Advances
in Animal Biosciences 1, 517-518. |
3 |
Agroecology and the
environment; Introduction to Brazilian partners via Skype; |
Mndez, V.E., C.M.
Bacon and R. Cohen (Guest Editors) (2013). Agroecology and the
transformation of agri-food systems:
Transdisciplinary and participatory perspectives. Invited Special
Inaugural Issue
of Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37(1) http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjsa21/37/1 Wezel, A., S.
Bellon, T. Dore, C. Francis, D. Vallod & C. David (2009) Agroecology as a
science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable
Development 29: 503-515. Mndez, V. E. (2010).
Agroecology. In B. Warf (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Geography. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications (in press). Altieri, M.A. and
V.M. Toledo (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing
nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant
Studies 38(3): 587-612. |
4 |
Review of rapid field
assessments for biodiversity, water quality, and carbon sequestration; Review
of ongoing economic surveys |
Kuncoro, S.A.,
Noordwijk, M.v., Martini, E., Saipothong, P., Areskoug, V., Putra, A.E.,
O'Connor, T., 2006. Rapid Agrobiodiversity Appraisal (RABA) in the Context of
Environmental Service Rewards. World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor, Indonesia. van Noordwijk, M.,
2008. Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal (RaCSA): a rapid but integrated way to
assess landscape carbon stock, in: World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, S.R.O.
(Ed.), Bogor, Indonesia. |
5 |
Review of rapid field
assessments for erosion regulation and other ecosystem services; organize
narrower working groups for field project |
Jeanes, K.,
Noordwijk, M.v., Joshi, L., Widayati, A., Leimona, F., Leimona, B., 2006.
Rapid Hydrological Appraisal in the context of environmental service rewards.
, in: World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, S.R.O. (Ed.), Bogor, Indonesia. |
6 |
Discussion of appropriate
methods for field portion of course |
TBA |
7 |
Final preparation for
field portion, review of safety issues etc. |
|
8 |
Field portion of course |
Feb. 27-March 8 |
9 |
Debriefing on results of
fieldwork |
|
10-15 |
Content to be covered in
final meeting times depends on results of field portion of course |
|
16 and exam period |
Presentation of student
projects |
|
Tentative
Schedule for Field Work
Date |
Activity |
Location |
Feb.
27 |
Depart
for Florianopolis |
BTV |
Feb.
28 (Sat) |
Arrive
in Florianopolis, go immediately to Garopaba. Tour of project, beach time,
dinner. |
FloripaGaropaba |
Mar
1 (Sun) |
Travel
to Santa Rosa de Lima, visit initial pilot projects (Seu Lauro, Seu
Sebastio, and/or Zenir farm), lecture with agroeco (Lcio) and Epagri (Jarson) |
Garopaba Santa Rosa de Lima |
Mar
2 (Mon) |
Field
day in SRdL. Lunch. Travel to Imarui. Visit sites of Seu Amilton. Return to
Garopaba. |
Santa
Rosa de Lima
ImaruiGaropaba |
Mar
3 (Tue) |
Project
site (Imarui; possibly Garopaba, Paulo Lopes, or Santa Rosa de Lima). Plant
understory acai, plant pioneers, mark off riparian zone. |
Project
site |
Mar
4 (Wed) |
Lecture
with MDA (Ide Alfonso) and Epagri (Carlos). Baseline data collection |
Project
site |
Mar
5 (Thu) |
Baseline
data collection. Afternoon recreational activity (e.g. visit Laguna to see
dolphins helping fishermen; surf lessons; hiking) |
Project
site |
Mar
6 (Fri) |
Baseline
data collection (tentative); return to Floripa for project wrap up. |
Project
site, Floripa |
Mar
7 (Sat) |
Project
wrap up, beach, depart for BTV |
Floripa btv |
Mar
8 |
(If
student schedules permit, weŐll depart for BTV on Sunday, arriving about 2PM
on Monday) |
Floripa btv |