Thucydides: The Mytilenian Debate
In 428, the Mytilenians revolted against Athens, even though they had
enjoyed privileged status in the Athenian empire. Much of Lesbos joined
the rebellion. The Mytilenians appealed to Athens' enemy, Sparta, for
help, but the Spartans lacked control of the sea and so were unable to
help. Under siege, the democratic faction in Mytilene eventually
decided to give up and forced the oligarchs to surrender the
city. The Athenians decreed that all adult male Mytilenians be
put to death and the women and children be enslaved, but on the next
day, they reconsidered. The following two speeches were reconstructed
by Thucydides to present the debate.
Issues raised: democracy and empire, death penalty, deterrence, role of
the common people in decisions, human nature, rule of law, propaganda,
rhetoric,
Cleon's Speech:
P 67
- Democracy cannot rule an empire
- changing your minds about Mytilene illustrates that
- you think that because in Athens you can afford not to
worry about conspiracies, you can do the same amongst your allies
- but your empire is
a tyranny and you have unwilling
subjects who continually plot against you
- they obey you only because you are stronger
- decisions must stand firm
- a city with bad laws is better if they are strict than a
city with good laws if they are unenforced
- people are better off if they are sensible but uneducated than if
they are clever but lack self-control
- the common people
govern better than the more intelligent
- intellectuals love to be wiser than the laws and to win a
debate
- common people are content to think their laws wiser than
they
- common people are not interested in making too-clever
speeches
- We should follow the commoner and not be carried away
by cleverness
- I have the same opinion I had before (kill the Mytilenians)
- A delay only helps the wrongdoer
- the victim's anger is allayed
- right after a crime, the victim metes out a harsher
penalty
- No one should be opposing me
- we already decreed to kill them
- the injustice the Mytilenians committed is not good for us
- their injustice does not harm our allies but ourselves
- either my opponent is
going to say the opposite-that the
Mytilenians helped us by revolting and harmed our allies-or he was
bribed!
- Athens has hurt herself by cultivating fine rhetoric
- the rhetorical contests you hold have formed bad habits
- you enjoy looking at spectacles
- real action is not your wont
- you consider what to do in the future on the basis of fine
speeches
- fine speeches are not about what is possible, but what
sounds good
- you think that what is presented in speech is more certain
than what you see with your own eyes
- you have a taste for the unusual and spurn the ordinary, the
common-sensical
- you all want to be effective speakers above all
- even if you are not, you try to compete with effective
speakers
- you applaud the fine speaker's point before it is made just
to appear clever yourselves
- but you do not see the point's consequences
- you want to hear about things extraordinary
- but you do not understand what happens under your noses
- you are so engrossed in what sounds good that you resemble
art critics more than people deliberating about public policy
- The Mytilenians have done us a greater harm than any other city
- cities which rebel because they cannot stand us are
understandable
- cities that rebel because they are forced to are
understandable
- But the Mytilenians were not forced to rebel and they had
sweet conditions
- THEREFORE, they are worse than others who rebel
- it is not even a rebellion
- rebellions can only come from oppressed people.
- the Mytilenians were not repressed
- BUT they have joined our worst enemies
- THEREFORE, they are guilty not of rebellion but of betrayal
- their action is far worse than if they had rebelled simply
to increase their own power.
- They did not learn from others'
example
- we put down every rebellion
of their neighbors
- their prosperity made them arrogant and reckless
- We should never have given them their extraordinary privileges
- too great fortune leads to temerity and recklessness
- they would not have waxed so insolent had we not made them
so great
- humans generally look with contempt on those who serve them
and look up to those who never give in to them
- THEREFORE, they should be punished as they deserve!
- the commoners as well as the oligarchs
- the commoners betrayed you as much as the oligarchs
- Consider what your allies will do
- if you treat those who rebel because they are forced to the
same as those who rebel on their own, everyone will rebel on their own
- if they win, they are free
- if they lose, they are treated in no irreparable manner
- if you create a situation like that, one city after another
will rebel
- if we put down the rebellion, we get a weaker subject
city less capable of paying tribute
- if we fail, we lose all the tribute and gain new enemies
and waste our time and effort fighting
- We must not, THEREFORE, give our allies any reason to be hopeful
about rebellion:we must punish the Mytilenians!!
- we must not let them think that they can rebel, then if they
lose, bribe us into letting them off easy
- nor must we let them think that we are soft and forgiving of
human error
- they conspired against us of their own free will
- only involuntary wrongs are to be pardoned
- THEREFORE< we should stick to our previous decision to kill
them all
- do not give in to pity
- do not give in to your delight in
good speeches
- do not give in to your
sense of fairness
- They will not have pity on us
- the pleasure of a good speech is lightweight in
comparison to the price we will pay if we are wooed by sweet speech
- we should only be fair to our friends
- Summary:
- following my advice will be justice
for the Mytilenians and
in your interest!
- pardoning them will not win their favor
- it would be tantamount to admitting that they were right
to rebel
- if it is right that they
rebel, we ought not to rule
them
- if your empire is unjust, if
you want to hold it anyway,
you must be harsh or give up the empire
- if they had won, they would
have tried to eliminate you
- therefore, since you
won, you should treat them as they
would have treated you
Diodotus' speech:
- haste and anger are inimical to
good judgement (i.e. we should
not act hastily or angrily)
- haste is usually thoughtless
- anger is ill-formed and narrow-minded
- discussion is necessary for
action (i.e. we need to discuss now,
and carefully)
- If one does not want to discuss the matter, he is either
- stupid
- because there is no other way to consider the future
- or has ulterior motives
- because he wants to persuade you to do something
awful, but offers slander instead of good argument
- accusing opponent of being bribed is worst of all (a
"loaded-question")
- no defense against it
- if one prevails, suspicion still there
- if one fails, one is thought stupid AND unjust
- such accusations do the city no good
- it loses advisors who fear such accusations
- People like my opponent Cleon would do the city the most good if
they could not speak well
- they would then persuade the city to fewer errors
- he terrifies those who would speak against him
- good advice should no more be rewarded than bad advice
- rewarding leads to good speakers seeking popularity against
their better judgment
- also leads unsuccessful speakers to seek popularity by
gratifying the people instead of giving good advice
- P72
- But we should reward the advisors
- Athens distrusts its advisors
- and so no one could possibly benefit Athens openly
- people will suspect he has something to gain.
- Orators should show more
foresight than commoners
- orators are held accountable
- commoners are not held
accountable for decisions they make
based on orators' advice
- commoners punish an orator
for one piece of bad advice
rather than themselves, who made the decision
- IMPLICIT PREMISE:
whoever makes/takes part in the
decision should be blamed
- Not killing the Mitylenians is
to Athens' advantage in the future
- 73
- the death penalty has been handed down for lesser crimes
than the Mytilenians' current crime
- as time goes on, more and more crimes are punished by
the death penalty
- because people continued violating the laws, the
penalties will have gotten stiffer.
- but people still commit crimes
- thus, the death
penalty does not work to deter crimes
- motives for crime are passions: desire and hope
- poverty compels people to be daring
- tuche
(fortune) also contributes by tempting people to
take risks
- cities are especially susceptible to these motives
- greater desires
- acting with others leads people to have greater hope
- therefore cities will
always be tempted to rebel, and it is
foolish to think we can deter them.
- given that cities will inevitably rebel anyway
- and that the death penalty leaves them no option to quit
before they have either utterly succeeded or utterly failed
- the death penalty will
only make rebellions harder to
put down.
- 74
- if we kill them, we will
lose revenue from Mytilene
- We should look for a way to impose
moderate penalties and insure
revenue from Mytilene in the future
- rigor of law will not work
to contain them
- we must watch them closely
- they had a good reason to rebel: they wanted autonomy
- if we want to keep them in our power, we must make them not
think of rebelling
- we should lay the blame
upon as few of them as possible
(i.e. find scapegoats?)
- if we punish them all, in the future the democrats
of other cities will not support us once there has been a rebellion,
because
they know they will be punished along with the oligarchs who started it
all.
- even if the democrats are guilty, we should pretend they are not,
so that they can perhaps support us in the future
- 75
- I am not arguing for pity or
fairness, but for Athens' advantage
- let the Mytilenians live and take your time punishing the
ringleaders
- P 78-the leaders, not the followers are to blame-end of §55
Diodotus prevailed