STATE ADMINISTRATION
(PA 319 MT 1 10233 and PA 319 A 11855)
Time: Mondays
Place:
Professor Frank Bryan
Tel: 656-0570
Office: Room 540
Office Hours: Mondays/Wednesdays/Fridays
Web Page: http://www.uvm.edu/~fbryan
Email: frank.bryan@uvm.edu
Grading System: Class Presentation - 30%, Paper - 50%, Short Final Essay - 20%
Final Draft of Paper Due: Monday, April 26
Frank Bryan and John McClaughry, The
Michael Sherman,
Other required reading material will be made available as the course unfolds.
Course Design
This course has two core goals: (1) A nuts and bolts appreciation for structures and processes of state-level public administration and (2) an understanding of the fundamental problems of managerial science that confront managers in state government.
A few examples of the areas in which these problems arise are:
· line/staff
· specialization/generalization
· rules/innovation
· leadership/followership
· direction/motivation
· hierarchy/networks
· facts/values
· democracy/authority
Beyond these core goals, it is important to understand that I view public administration in the context of the tradition of the liberal arts and sciences. Even (perhaps especially) those working toward a professional, "terminal" degree like the MPA and who intend to build a career managing the public sector need to seek out and attempt to understand the great questions of politics and administration that have confronted the human race since we began to gather together to accomplish mutual goals.
There is, moreover, a utility in this approach. Managers who can place themselves comfortably in the history of ideas and the dynamics of causation and who have acquired the habit of treating their day-to-day decisions in the context of such notions, are in the long run, it seems to me, happier managers and happier managers are more efficient managers.
It is often said that the term "practical theorist" is an oxymoron. I don’t believe that. I believe there is nothing more "practical" than a theory that works—a paradigm that delivers.
The course is divided in two parts, my lectures and structured student presentations. In my lectures I will deal with fundamental questions that will be raised in one form or another (I hope) in the papers you write. This is a traditional seminar. That is, it relies on the blending of student and teacher knowledge and experience. Key to my heuristic bias in designing this seminar is the following model: A professor builds an argument over the years and students come together to explore and to test it. It is from this exchange that learning happens.
My argument is found in The
Paper
Design
Your paper should do four things:
(1) It should describe in detail the structure of a state administrative office (agency, department, division, board or whatever). This description should anchor the authority of the office as it is manifest in the State Constitution and statutory and (or) administrative enactments. It should place the office in its administrative setting in state government, outline the configuration of the office internally, and describe any regional administrative apparatus it may have.
(2) It should describe in detail some policy this office administers. This policy should likewise be traced to Constitutional, statutory, and administrative authority. How the policy is implemented in the context of its administrative environment should consume a significant portion of your paper.
(3) It should treat some of the important universal questions of management that I raise in my lectures. The paper should not be designed to do this. These observations should accompany the narration of the policy's implementation mentioned in (2) above.
(4) It should contain a section entitled:
"How would this policy be implemented (both in terms of structure
and process) if
PART I Lecture/Participation Seminars |
||||||
Class |
Date |
Topic |
|
|||
1 |
Jan. 26 |
Studying State Administration |
|
|||
2 |
Feb. 2 |
The Culture of State Administration in |
The
|
|||
3 |
Feb. 9 |
Bureaucracy and the Concept of Human Scale—Theory
and Practice |
The
|
|||
4 |
Feb. 23 |
|
Hanson, “Intergovernmental Relations”
(copy provided) Elling, “Administering State Programs”
(copy provided) |
|||
5 |
Mar. 1 |
Complexity in |
In Fitzhugh, “The Executive Ristau, “The State and the Federal
Government” |
|||
6 |
Mar. 8 |
The Political Context of |
Bryan, “The Rural Technopolity” (copy
provided) In Graff, “Parties and Politics” |
|||
NOTE: Other readings will be made available as
the dynamic of the course requires. |
||||||
PART II State Administration in Practice (Student
Presentations) |
||||||
Specific examples and the required reading to accompany them (mostly
from Sherman) will depend on the cases selected by the seminar participants. |
||||||
Student
Presentations (topics due February 9) |
||||||
Class |
Date |
|
|
|||
7 |
Mar. 22 |
|
|
|||
8 |
Mar. 29 |
|
|
|||
9 |
April 5 |
|
|
|||
10 |
April 12 |
|
|
|||
11 |
April 19 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
Class |
Date |
|
|
|||
12 |
April 26 |
Papers Due |
|
|||
13 |
May 3 |
Final Exam—A “Take Home” Short Essay |
|
|||