Jim Jeffords:
Hero or Opportunist?
By Frank Bryan
May 2002
Last year
Jim Jeffords rebelled against his party and was
cloaked a hero of the independent, free-thinkers that are part of the
Now a year
later we will be hearing much speculation on the influences Jeffords
made on national policy.
There are,
however, other interesting questions. Questions having to do with history and tradition.
First, how
will history judge Jeffords? Senator Jeffords was raised privileged, his father the Chief
Justice of the Vermont Supreme Court. His marriage to the Republican Party was
one of class convenience arranged in the 1960’s. Doors were opened for him in a
way they were never opened for Philip Hoff or Bernie Sanders or nearly any
other politician of his era. These doors were opened by Republicans. Yet the
first time he was denied an opportunity he wanted (the Republican nomination
for governor in 1972) he did not take it well. In fact he acted like a spoiled
child. George Bush Jr. did not end Jeffords’ marriage
to the GOP. Jim ended it himself in 1972. But he refused to leave the house.
Vermonters
don’t know these things. We don’t even want to know them!
But Jim
knows them. And history will tell.
I look at Jeffords now and see a certain sadness – like a partner
that stayed in a bad marriage for years bickering with a political party he
didn’t even like. He finally left that marriage when the opportunity arose to
do his party the greatest possible harm. Moreover, there was an immensely
attractive, seductive, new partner waiting for him in the form of his own
committee chairmanship, the romance of national attention earlier undreamed of,
and most of all the adoration of a state that likes independents, liberals and
Democrats and doesn’t like conservatives and oil men from
History will
not be as kind to Jeffords as we have been. I think
he will leave politics a lonely man.
Second. What about us? What about our legacy “Don’t mess with
But
Like
frontier persons everywhere we appreciate togetherness and the tolerance born
of shared fate. Rather than act of defiant individualism consider Jeffords’ act as Jon Margolis
described it in the Wall Street Journal. It was, he wrote, “evidence of
the persistence of an old tradition and of how much he and
A longing for this
It is
difficult to imagine Jeffords getting less mileage
out of George Bush Jr. than he did from the far more conservative (and far less
personally engaging) Republican president, Ronald Reagan. His policy excuses
(from education to agriculture) for divorcing the party in 2001 simply don’t
wash.
But by the
year 2000 Jim Jeffords was much older and he was
tired and he was sick of the game. He longed to set himself right with his world.
He longed to leave and go home.
There are
much worse longings than these.
Senator Jeffords. Hero or opportunist? Probably a little of both. Somewhere in
the middle. And that is where Senator Jeffords
likes to be.