<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ents/eugenics.xsl"?>
<TEI>
   <teiHeader><fileDesc>

         <titleStmt>

            <title>Outline for Talk at First Meeting of the Vermont Commission 
on Country Life: a machine readable edition</title>

            <author>Henry F. Perkins</author>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Creation of machine-readable version:</resp>

               <name>Nancy Gallagher</name>
            </respStmt><respStmt>
                        
               <resp>Additional scanning and OCR:</resp>

               <name>Hope Greenberg</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup:</resp>

               <name>Hope Greenberg</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

         </titleStmt>

         <extent>ca. 10 kilobytes</extent>

         <publicationStmt><publisher>University of Vermont</publisher><pubPlace>Burlington, Vermont USA</pubPlace><availability>

               <p>Available from: UVM Electronic text Archive</p>

               <p>URL: http://etext.uvm.edu</p>

            </availability><date>June 2002</date></publicationStmt>

         <sourceDesc>

            <biblFull>

               <titleStmt>

                  <title level="a">Outline for Talk at First Meeting of the Vermont 
Commission
on Country Life</title>

                  <title level="u">Unpublished manuscript from the Vermont Commission on Country Life 
papers</title> 
                  <author>Henry F. Perkins</author>

                  <editor/>

               </titleStmt>

               <editionStmt>

                  <p/>

               </editionStmt>

               <publicationStmt><publisher/><pubPlace/><date>May 18, 1928</date></publicationStmt>

               <notesStmt>

                  <note/>

               </notesStmt>

            </biblFull>

         </sourceDesc>

      </fileDesc><encodingDesc>

         <projectDesc>

            <p>Prepared for the University of Vermont Electronic Text
Archive.</p>

         </projectDesc>

         <editorialDecl>

            <p>Scanner: Visioneer 6100 (36 bit, 600x1200). Text
OCR by Visioneer. </p>

            <p>Quote marks retained as data. All "M" and "N" dashes converted to two hyphens or one
hyphen, respectively. All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and the trailing   
part of a word has been joined to the preceding line. Some text realigned to left for purposes of
readability, at discretion of editors.</p>

         </editorialDecl>

      </encodingDesc><profileDesc>

         <creation>
            <date>May 18, 1928</date> 
         </creation>

         <textClass>

            <keywords scheme="#">

               <term>WE'LL LET NANCY DETERMINE THESE</term>

            </keywords>

         </textClass>

      </profileDesc></teiHeader>

   <text>

      <front>

         <div1 type="front">


            <bibl>
               <author>Perkins, Henry F.</author>
               <title level="a">Outline for Talk at First Meeting
of the Vermont Commission on Country Life. </title>
               <title level="u">Unpublished manuscript
of address to the VCCL</title>
               <date>May 18, 1928</date>
               <note type="location" anchored="true">Eugenics Survey of 
Vermont and Vermont Commission on Country Life Papers, VCCL Before 1931‐‐ "VCCL
Addresses"</note>
               <note type="restriction" anchored="true">Permission required for reproduction. Vermont Public Records. 
</note>
            </bibl>


         </div1>

      </front>

      <body>

         <div1 type="document">

            <head type="doc">
               <hi rend="center">Outline for Talk at First Meeting<lb/>of the <lb/>Vermont 
Commission on Country Life</hi>
            </head>

            <p>
               <hi rend="center">May 18, 1928</hi>
            </p>

            <p>General Outline of Headings
<list type="simple">

                  <item>1. Falling population in rural Vermont.</item>

                  <item>2. Variety of remedies recommended.</item>

                  <item>3. Social betterment activities now operating in 
Vermont.</item>

                  <item>4. Previous surveys in Vermont and elsewhere. Scope and 
accomplishment.</item>

                  <item>5. Reasons for failure of some past surveys.</item>

                  <item>6. Features of present plan aimed to avoid similar mistakes.</item>

                  <item>7. How the plan originated [The time and the place].</item>

                  <item>8. Opinions of experts.</item>

                  <item>9. Scope of the plan in personnel, time and money.</item>

                  <item>10. Set-up of administration.</item>

                  <item>11. Procedure for practical improvement programs.</item>

                  <item>12. Ultimate value.</item>

               </list>

            </p>


            <p>1. During the census period from 1910 to 1920 there were one 
thousand counties in the United States, including some in almost every 
state, in which the population fell. These of course were the rural 
districts. Vermont has some characteristics peculiar to itself, but in 
general its problems are very much the same as those of other states so 
far as the rural population is concerned. The things that cause a decline 
in the country population in Vermont are bringing about the same results 
elsewhere. We do not need to dwell upon the details of the situation 
because it is common knowledge that in the rural areas of Vermont each 
successive census shows a lower population than the one preceding.</p>


            <p>Along with the decline in numbers, a good many people who have looked 
into 
the matter are very sure that there is an almost more serious falling off 
in the quality. They point to the fact that many of the older families who 
formed the backbone of a given community 25 years ago have entirely 
disappeared. The older people have died off and the younger ones, having 
tasted the joys of life in a larger community, have been loath to return 
and in most cases have settled down elsewhere.</p>


            <p>The movement from agricultural to industrial life has brought about a 
large part of this changing population. The younger generation demands 
more in the way of recreation and social activity than can be found in the 
isolated farm or country village. Parents want better education for their 
children than they had themselves and when someone is taken suddenly ill 
it is very hard to get a doctor to make the long trip in a hurry, 
especially if the roads happen to be impassible.
Modern invention has of course brought the countryside to the doors of the 
city and many people thought that this would be the beginning of a return 
wave and that a great many people who had lived in the cities under 
crowded and restricted conditions would now decide to return to the soil, 
perhaps buy back the ancestral farm and again become dwellers in the 
country. There does not seem to be any marked tendency for this to come 
true. There has been no returning wave.</p>


            <p>2. Almost every student of the changing population in rural parts of 
the country has had some special remedy to recommend. The treatment of the 
condition that commends itself to one does not appeal to the next person 
as being worthwhile. There are, therefore, about as many different 
remedies recommended as there are people seriously considering the 
question, and that is a good many. Some experiments have been tried aiming 
at an artificial stimulation of the life of the country and no doubt the 
current of migration cityward has been slowed down by the numerous 
attempts to make the country homes and communities more desirable.</p>


            <p>One of the motives that used to be effective does not seem to appeal so 
strongly to the rising generation, that is, loyalty to the ancestral home. 
Amongst Vermonters there seems to be a remarkable tenacity in holding to 
the soil amongst the older people, a tendency which is akin to loyalty and 
patriotism. It is a strong sentimental bond and it is too bad that there 
is not more of it amongst the younger people. Perhaps they are more 
practical and less sentimental than their fathers, but the fact is that 
they are keener for immediate enjoyments, material comforts, a competency 
at the earliest possible age. Many of them had to work pretty hard in 
their childhood days helping on the farms. A living can be made in the 
city with less effort and thousands of young people would rather put up 
with inadequate and cramped living quarters for the sake of the greater 
social opportunities and recreational pleasures of the city than to have 
plenty of room with hard work and little pleasure in the country.</p>


            <p>3. Quite a group of social investigators insist very strongly upon 
the importance of supplying young people with more social and recreational 
opportunities, especially in the rural areas. Summer camps for country 
boys and girls are increasing and various winter activities, various forms 
of supervised play, are carried on by the camp organizations or under 
separate leadership. The Community Center is a remarkably active agency in 
bringing together those healthful opportunities for the old and the very 
young as well as far the youth of the community.</p>


            <p>It would be an easy matter to give quite an imposing list of other 
activities that are being conducted in various parts of Vermont, all 
looking toward the improvement of conditions in the sparsely settled parts 
of the state. A catalogue of all these enterprises- agricultural, 
economic, educational, medical and social- would bring out clearly the 
fact that no small amount of energy is now being put forth in the 
interests of the people who live in rural Vermont. A study of the extent 
to which these same activities should be grafted on to the life of other 
communities would be a most desirable thing to undertake, but it should be 
done judiciously in order to insure the greatest chance of getting 
results.</p>


            <p>4. Too many studies, surveys and investigations have resulted in 
little tangible improvement, and a great deal of money has been expended 
and much effort put forth in order to carry out those surveys. Vermont has 
probably had not nearly so many experiences of this kind as have many 
other states. Why have they brought such apparently meager returns for the 
money and effort involved?</p>


            <p>5. In answer to this question I submit to you these two answers: 
First, the work was not planned with sufficient care and forethought, 
especially as regards the accomplishment of the desired results. The 
survey was about all there was to it. It was believed, but proved not to 
be rightly anticipated, that finding out the facts would be all that was 
necessary, that the people would read the report of the survey, see that 
there was need of certain improvements and immediately set about making 
them. In all too many cases this prediction, founded in optimism, ended in 
disillusionment, and the results were not commensurate with the 
outlay.</p>


            <p>The second answer to the question is that the study or survey was 
probably 
conducted by someone with a preformed judgment as to what he would find. 
Most specialists are honest men, but they have spent so much time in 
investigating one side of human life that they could scarcely be expected 
to be quite free from bias. The case is very much like a patient suffering 
from some obscure malady. Take him to a nerve specialist and the verdict 
is, "Something wrong with the patient's nervous system." Take him to a 
stomach specialist and the verdict is that an operation of some sort on 
the digestive tract is the only thing for him. Each specialist has a right 
to his own prejudices and in most of the social investigations the workers 
have actually found sufficient cause for recommending their own particular 
kind of surgical operation or medical remedy. Had there been a 
consultation of doctors, however, a slightly different or perhaps a 
radically different treatment might have been recommended.</p>


            <p>6. In order to avoid falling into these two mistakes, first of 
failing to make provision for improvement programs following the 
investigation, and second, failure to secure the benefit of expert 
judgment by a variety of experts, the plan that we are now about to 
consider, aims to adopt the policy of flexibility so as to adjust itself 
to each particular situation, the policy of comprehensiveness, involving a 
joint study by a dozen or more experts and their helpers, covering perhaps 
20 or 30 scattered typical rural areas which will be very carefully 
chosen, and the policy of thoroughness, aiming from the very outset and 
all the time to pave the way for constructive improvement measures.</p>


            <p>7. It seems an opportune time for an investigation of this sort. The 
flood has changed the situation in Vermont more than most of us realize. 
Any great catastrophe brings a good many changes in its wake and that is 
true in this case. People are much more open minded and ready to consider 
calmly suggestions for improvement than they were a year ago. There is an 
alertness noticeable amongst our country people, a keen and intelligent 
interest in their particular problems. The inertia amounting almost to 
torpor of a generation ago is giving way.</p>


            <p>Another reason why this is a good time for a study of rural conditions 
is 
that we seem to have come to the point where the conflict of ideas between 
those who favor industrialization and those who insist upon the return to 
the soil has got to be settled. There is very little use in saying, "Let 
things go on about as they are. Conditions were good enough for our 
grandparents, we can put up with them for a while yet." Things have come 
to such a pass in many of our rural communities that it is a question 
whether they will be able to keep themselves alive much longer unless 
something pretty radical is done and that soon.</p>


            <p>As to the reason for selecting Vermont for such an investigation. In 
the 
first place, we are Vermonters and we want to get the good of anything 
that is within reach and that promises bettered conditions of living. 
There is much more chance of accomplishing something in a small state than 
in a large one, and Vermont has so very large a proportion of its area 
occupied by farm land, so large a proportion of its population living in 
villages and small towns, that it may be called a profoundly rural 
state.</p>


            <p>Because then, there is a good chance of doing something here in Vermont 
that will really improve conditions for the country dweller, make life 
more interesting in the country for the young people and thereby check the 
movement from the small village to the larger centers; because there is a 
chance of getting results by carefully planning beforehand how 
recommendations for improvement can be carried into practical effect after 
they have been made by a group of investigators and as a result of 
thorough study; because the time is appropriate for such an investigation 
and hopeful for the carrying out of improvements; because Vermont is a 
small enough and a rural enough state to make it a peculiarly good place 
for such a study; it is recommended that this meeting declare itself as in 
favor of carrying out a plan for a Comprehensive Survey of Rural 
Vermont.</p>


            <p>8. I could name you a score of nationally known authorities on 
various aspects of rural life who agree with us that this is an opportune 
time and Vermont is an opportune place for such a study; that it is a 
practical idea in that there is every opportunity to carry into effect 
constructive ideas for the betterment of conditions of living in the 
sparsely settled portions of the state. No one who has not looked into the 
matter has the slightest conception of the scope of the researches that 
are now being conducted. Investigations more or less similar to but far 
less elaborate than the one that we are proposing have been and are under 
way in a great many parts of the country. I do not discover that anything 
of a degree of comprehensiveness approaching our plan has been considered 
elsewhere. In fact, cooperative studies are only just beginning to be 
undertaken at all. There are a surprising number of agencies, in many 
cases having large funds at their disposal, organized for the purpose of 
conducting studies either having a. scientific objective or planned for 
purposes of social betterment.</p>


            <p>The present plan has the social betterment idea prominently in view 
from 
beginning to end but there is no doubt about its bringing to light a 
considerable amount of information of high scientific value. This makes it 
appeal strongly to many of the investigating agencies. They are in many 
cases willing to cooperate in as large a measure as our Vermont 
organization deems advisable. They will contribute personnel and expense 
money to a very considerable amount if asked to do so. I have written 
agreements from a number of these organizations that it such a study is 
put on in Vermont they will be glad to help, providing we want them 
to.</p>


            <p>9. The resolutions to be presented in a few minutes will ask for the 
appointment of an Executive Committee. They will decide what shall, be 
done under your instructions. I may, however, outline briefly the 
tentative plan which will, be suggested to them for their consideration, 
but which they may or may not think best to follow even in the most 
general way. You may be interested to know something about what this plan 
contemplates.</p>


            <p>First, the selection of a General Director. He must be a man of 
national 
reputation and wide experience in various forms of social investigation. 
Such a man is in view and has expressed his interest in the suggestion 
that he be the General Director.</p>


            <p>Second, the establishment of a headquarters at some convenient point 
with 
an office which will, be kept up during the entire time of the study.</p>


            <p>Third, a preliminary scanning of the problems in rural parts of Vermont 
by 
the General Director. This will require considerable travel and that costs 
money. The salary of the Director, the expenses of the office and office 
staff and the travel money will have to be raised. This will involve, for 
a three years' investigation, about $84,000. There is reason to believe 
that the Executive Committee will be able to secure this money without 
making a canvass of people in Vermont.</p>


            <p>10. The fourth part of the plan is a year's investigation to choose 
the various places for the study. No one place will be subjected to an 
unwelcome amount of investigation. No investigator will be admitted to 
this study who has not demonstrated his ability to sell his program and 
otherwise make himself welcome in the community where he is working. All 
the investigators will be under the direction of the Executive Committee 
and the Director. They will be required to make frequent reports, all of 
which will be the property of the General Survey. A most important aspect 
of the work will be the compiling of the information gathered by the 
research workers. This will be brought together and put into its most 
useful form during the third year by the General Director, and the report 
will be published as soon as possible after the close of the study. It 
will make a special point of practical recommendations.</p>


            <p>11. The final results of the study will, probably not be evident for a 
long time to come because if the work accomplished its purpose at all it 
will set in motion tendencies that will bring about improvement of living 
conditions, social activities and all other phases of life in the country.  
These recommendations for the setup of improvement programs will be made 
by the workers in the field just as rapidly as they come to any conclusion 
as to what is particularly needed in any one place. They will be just as 
apt to recommend the adoption of a plan in other parts of the state when 
they find one that is working advantageously in one of their localities. 
Criticisms that have no constructive importance are not wanted and will 
not be considered, much less published. Every safeguard will be placed 
about the publication of information in the press and in the printed 
reports so that no embarrassment will be caused any individual or any 
community. The workers will be chosen because of their experience in 
handling such matters skillfully and tactfully. No apprehension need be 
felt on this point. Unpleasant criticisms and the publishing of 
unfavorable statements about persons or places would plainly lessen the 
value if not ruin all success of this entire undertaking, and are 
therefore the last thing that the promoters of the Survey would 
countenance.</p>


            <p>12. What is aimed at in this survey is to get facts in regard to the 
good things that are now in operation in the rural parts of Vermont and 
put them into operation in other parts of the state where they will fit 
the situation. A careful study of the needs of a community followed as 
speedily as possible by the setting up of an improvement program in that 
community, ought with careful and well grounded planning to bring about 
highly desirable results in our state.</p>

 
         </div1> 

      </body> 
      <back> 
         <div1 type="back"> 
            <p>
               <hi rend="bold">Publication Restrictions:</hi>
               <lb/>

The images and text on this web site are solely for education and research
uses. With the exception of government documents, images and texts may not
be used in digital or print form by organizations or commercial
enterprises except with written permission of the copyright holder or the
repository of origin. The materials may be used in digital or print form
with appropriate source citation in unpublished reports, classroom
instruction, research, community forums, and other non-profit
activities.<lb/>


               <lb/>
               <hi rend="bold">Permission required for reproduction.</hi>
               <lb/>
Vermont Public Records<lb/>
Central Services Division<lb/>
Route 2, Middlesex<lb/>
Drawer 33<lb/>
Montpelier, VT 05633<lb/>
            </p> 
         </div1> 
      </back> 
   </text>

</TEI>
