<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ents/eugenics.xsl"?>
<TEI>

   <teiHeader><fileDesc>

         <titleStmt>

            <title>Report to
the Eugenics Survey Advisory Committee: a machine readable edition</title>

            <author>H.F Perkins</author>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Creation of machine-readable version:</resp>

               <name>Nancy
Gallagher</name>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Additional scanning and OCR:</resp>

               <name>Ben Schacher</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup:</resp>

               <name>Mary Margaret Welch</name>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Additional markup by:</resp>

               <name>Hope Greenberg, Shane Barney</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

         </titleStmt>

         <extent>ca. 11 kilobytes</extent>

         <publicationStmt><publisher>University of Vermont</publisher><pubPlace>Burlington, Vermont USA</pubPlace><availability>

               <p>Available from: UVM Electronic text Archive</p>

               <p>URL: http://etext.uvm.edu</p>

            </availability><date>July/2000</date></publicationStmt>

         <sourceDesc>

            <biblFull>

               <titleStmt>

                  <title level="u">Report to the
Eugenics Survey Advisory Committee</title>

                  <title level="j"/>

                  <author>H.F Perkins</author>

                  <editor/>

               </titleStmt>

               <editionStmt>

                  <p/>

               </editionStmt>

               <publicationStmt><publisher/><pubPlace/><date>October 3, 1928</date></publicationStmt>

               <notesStmt>

                  <note/>

               </notesStmt>

            </biblFull>

         </sourceDesc>

      </fileDesc><encodingDesc>

         <projectDesc>

            <p>Prepared for the University of Vermont Electronic Text Archive.</p>

         </projectDesc>

         <editorialDecl>

            <p>Scanner: Visioneer 6100 (36 bit, 600x1200).
Text OCR by Visioneer. </p>

            <p>Quote marks retained as data. All "M" and "N" dashes converted to two hyphens or one
hyphen, respectively. All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and the trailing   
part of a word has been joined to the preceding line. Some text realigned to left for purposes of
readability, at discretion of editors.</p>

         </editorialDecl>

      </encodingDesc><profileDesc>

         <creation>
            <date>October 3, 1928</date> 
         </creation>

         <textClass>

            <keywords scheme="#">

               <term>WE'LL LET NANCY DETERMINE THESE</term>

            </keywords>

         </textClass>

      </profileDesc></teiHeader>

   <text>

      <front>

         <div1>

            <bibl>
               <author>Perkins, H. F.</author>
               <title level="u">Report to the Eugenics Survey Advisory 
Committee</title>
               <date>Oct. 3, 1928</date>
               <note type="location" anchored="true">Eugenics Survey of 
Vermont Papers, General: Advisory Committee</note> 
               <note type="restriction" anchored="true">Permission required for reproduction. Vermont Public Records. 
</note>

            </bibl>

         </div1>

      </front>

      <body>

         <div1>

            <div2>

               <head>
                  <hi rend="center">THE EUGENICS SURVEY OF
VERMONT<lb/>A Brief Summary at a Plan for the Program<lb/>January 1, 1929 to June 30. 
1930</hi>
               </head> 
               <p>1. <hi rend="uline">PARTICIPATION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF
RURAL VERMONT</hi>
               </p>

               <p>The Eugenics Surrey
was the instigator of the Comprehensive Survey of Rural Vermont.
It is therefore its plain duty to fit into the plan of this larger
undertaking in the best way possible. I suggest the following,</p>

               <p>A STUDY OF SELECTED FAMILIES
IN RELATION TO THE HISTORY, PRESENT CONDITION AND
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SOME TYPICAL RURAL AREAS.</p>

               <p>The object is to discover in how far
hereditary tendencies seem to have operated, beneficially or
harmfully in certain rural areas in Vermont. Have the descendants of
the original settlers maintained their high standards? Do the
descendants of the old families seem to be destined to supply the
builders of a better Vermont or are the more recent immigrants likely
to perform that function?</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>2. <hi rend="uline">MATERIAL NOW ON FILE</hi>
               </p>

               <p>Our pedigree families were selected for their high
rate 
of dependency, deficiency and delinquency in successive
generations. They have apparently had a profound effect for ill upon
many of the towns where they lived, but in the case of some of the
better branches, the influence has apparently been good.</p>

               <p>Taking as a starting point the information now in our file, we
can gather many more facts concerning the part played by these
families and we can add other equally important facts concerning
other families in the same areas. These facts should help us in an
attempt to answer the questions: ‐‐</p>

               <p>What influence have the successive generations of families
A and B had upon the development of towns X and Y?</p>

               <p>Have the successive generations of families A and B
improved or deteriorated, especially as judged by a comparison
between the present generation and some generation in the remote
past?</p>

               <p>Is the environment supplied by towns X and Y apparently
responsible for that improvement or deterioration?</p>

               <p>IF POSSIBLE, PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE FULL
PLAN ACCOMPANYING THIS SUMMARY.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>


               <head>
                  <hi rend="center">PLAN FOR THE PROGRAM OF THE EUGENICS SURVEY OF VERMONT<lb/> FOR THE
EIGHTEEN MONTHS<lb/> January 1, 1929 to June 30, 1930</hi>
               </head>

               <p>1. <hi rend="uline">THE COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF RURAL VERMONT</hi>
               </p>


               <p>As you already know Dr. H.
C. Taylor, working in conjunction with the Executive Committee of
the Vermont Commission on Country Life, is planning active field
work by a considerable group of agencies, to be done for the most
part between July 1, 1929 and June 30, 1930.</p>

               <p>The nineteen divisions of the Survey that are now on the
blotter are as follows:</p>


               <p>
                  <list type="simple">
                     <item>1. Contributions of Vermont to National
life.</item>
                     <item>2. Geographical factors basic to rural
life.</item>
                     <item>3. Races, population and
migrations.</item>
                     <item>4. Landownership and tenancy.</item>
                     <item>5. Rural
finance‐‐credit, taxation.</item>
                     <item>6. Transportation and
communication.</item>
                     <item>7. The farm production and marketing
problem.</item>
                     <item>8. Forestry.</item>
                     <item>9. Summer residence end
recreation.</item>
                     <item>10. Land utilization.</item>
                     <item>11. Quarries,
mines, manufactures and commerce.</item>
                     <item>12. Living
standards.</item>
                     <item>13. Rural health.</item>
                     <item>14. Rural
schools.</item>
                     <item>15. Adult
education.</item>
                     <item>16. Libraries.</item>
                     <item>17. Religious
forces.</item>
                     <item>18. Eugenics.</item>
                     <item>19. Citizenship.</item>
                  </list>The
question is now: ‐‐ What plan shall the Advisory
Committee, of the Eugenics Survey make for the period beginning
January 1, 1929 that will most effectively carry on the purposes of
the Eugenics Survey and at the same time fit into the plan of the
Rural Survey?</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>2. <hi rend="uline">AREA STUDY</hi>
               </p>

               <p>The various organizations, State departments and
other groups that have already been signed up for the Comprehensive
Survey will be allotted to various areas in the State, in such a way
that each area will be investigated by about five of the agencies. An
“area" will perhaps be a few square miles, ten for example, its
boundary a circle drawn around a village as a center. The areas will
be chosen with reference to their ability to contribute the facts that
are most desired in this study of rural conditions in Vermont, as
representative as possible of the different types of rural conditions to
be found in the State as a whole.</p>

               <p>Selection of the areas has not yet been begun.  Shall we
anticipate the possible selection of a few areas in which we have
already made a beginning?  My recommendation is that we do so, in
consultation with Dr. Taylor.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>3.  <hi rend="uline">PLAN OF STUDY</hi>
               </p>

               <p>The geographical index of the Eugenics Survey is
quite complete, giving the residences of more than 8,000 persons
listed in our pedigrees of delinquent, deficient and dependent
families. Certain areas are naturally better represented in this index
than others. Some of these are apparently quite characteristic rural
areas, and it is my recommendation that we begin at once to study the
eugenic factors that hare been operating in some of them in the
expectation that the Rural Survey will select them for a study of other
factors.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>4. <hi rend="uline">THE TOWN OF
READSBORO</hi>
               </p>

               <p>What eugenic factors have
been operating in and influencing the history of the town of
Readsboro?</p>

               <p>The reasons for selecting this town are that it has a number
of characteristic Vermont rural features and that it has for many years
been the home of members of the [Rector] family, one of our twelve
main pedigree groups. What has the [Rector] family done to this town
and what has this town done to the [Rector] family? Those are two
very comprehensive questions and we cannot expect to answer them
completely. I feel however that a study of these questions would be
precisely in line with the aims of this Survey and would be a real
contribution to the effort of the Rural Survey to discover, for the
purpose of setting up a state‐wide improvement program, the
interacting factors that have brought about the present condition,
whether good, bad or indifferent, of rural Vermont.</p>

               <p>While studying the relations existing between the [Rector]
family and the town of Readsboro, our investigator will have an
opportunity to discover other families equally important in the
history of the town, Some of them will be found to have been helpful,
others a social and economic drag, perhaps a menace. It will be his
or her duty to find out the history of these families, the contributions
that they have made in personnel, in economic, social, religious and
other ways. Not only their contributions to Readsboro but to other
places as well, whether in Vermont or outside of it, should be looked
into. In other words, what sort of American citizens have these
people been? What sort of American citizens are their descendants
likely to be?</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>5. <hi rend="uline">SIGNIFICANCE TO VERMONT</hi>
               </p>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="uline">Usefulness of This Study</hi>
               </p>

               <p>When this information has been collected, what use can be
made of it?  Will it be anything more than a contribution to academic
discussion? </p>

               <p>I might attempt to answer the above questions but my
answers would be open to the criticism of vagueness and generality. 
Frankly, I am not yet prepared to give an answer. The purpose of our
Survey is to gather information that may sooner or later have
important bearings upon the welfare of Vermont and the country. Just
what those bearings will be, I do not know. I do know that much
effort has been expended fruitlessly in Vermont because of the lack
of adequate information ‐‐ adequate in quantity and in accuracy. I
believe that such a study as I have outlined is likely to bring out
valuable information. I believe that our legislators, our judges, our
superintendents of institutions and the heads of our social work
organizations will be better able to function efficiently if they can
know the answers to some of these questions. I believe that it is the
duty of this Eugenics Survey of Vermont to try to discover these
answers.</p>

               <p>Do you agree with me? A full and frank answer is earnestly
desired. Please be candid and merciless in your criticisms.</p>

               <signed>[H. F. Perkins]</signed>

            </div2>

         </div1>

      </body>

      <back>

         <div1>

            <p>
               <hi rend="bold">Publication Restrictions:</hi>
               <lb/>

The images and text on this web site are solely for education and research
uses. With the exception of government documents, images and texts may not
be used in digital or print form by organizations or commercial
enterprises except with written permission of the copyright holder or the
repository of origin. The materials may be used in digital or print form
with appropriate source citation in unpublished reports, classroom
instruction, research, community forums, and other non-profit
activities.<lb/>


               <lb/>
               <hi rend="bold">Permission required for reproduction.</hi>
               <lb/>
Vermont Public Records<lb/>
Central Services Division<lb/>
Route 2, Middlesex<lb/>
Drawer 33<lb/>
Montpelier, VT 05633<lb/>
            </p>

         </div1>

      </back>

   </text>

</TEI>
