<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ents/eugenics.xsl"?>
<TEI>

   <teiHeader><fileDesc>

         <titleStmt>

            <title>Letter, H.F. Perkins to
the Eugenics Survey Advisory Committee, enclosed proposal for 
Comprehensive Rural Survey: a machine readable 
edition</title> 
            <author>H.F. Perkins</author>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Creation of machine-readable version:</resp>

               <name>Nancy Gallagher</name>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Additional scanning and OCR:</resp>

               <name>Ben Schacher</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

            <respStmt>

               <resp>Conversion to
TEI.2-conformant markup:</resp>

               <name>Mary Margaret Welch</name>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Additional markup by:</resp>

               <name>Hope Greenberg, Shane Barney</name>

            <name/></respStmt>

         </titleStmt>

         <extent>ca. 24 kilobytes</extent>

         <publicationStmt><publisher>University of Vermont</publisher><pubPlace>Burlington, Vermont USA</pubPlace><availability>

               <p>Available from: UVM Electronic text Archive</p>

               <p>URL: http://etext.uvm.edu</p>

            </availability><date>July/2000</date></publicationStmt>

         <sourceDesc>

            <biblFull>

               <titleStmt>

                  <title level="u">Letter, H.F. Perkins to the
Eugenics Survey Advisory Committee, enclosed proposal for 
Comprehensive Rural Survey</title>

                  <title level="j">TITLE OF WORK FROM WHICH DOCUMENT IS
DRAWN (EX: Proceedings of, etc.)</title>

                  <author>H.F. Perkins</author>

                  <editor/>

               </titleStmt>

               <editionStmt>

                  <p/>

               </editionStmt>

               <publicationStmt><publisher/><pubPlace/><date>May 23, 1927</date></publicationStmt>

               <notesStmt>

                  <note/>

               </notesStmt>

            </biblFull>

         </sourceDesc>

      </fileDesc><encodingDesc>

         <projectDesc>

            <p>Prepared for the University of Vermont Electronic Text Archive.</p>

         </projectDesc>

         <editorialDecl>

            <p>Scanner: Visioneer 6100 (36 bit, 600x1200).
Text OCR by Visioneer. </p>

            <p>Quote marks retained as data. All "M" and "N" dashes converted to two hyphens or one
hyphen, respectively. All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and the trailing   
part of a word has been joined to the preceding line. Some text realigned to left for purposes of
readability, at discretion of editors.</p>

         </editorialDecl>

      </encodingDesc><profileDesc>

         <creation>
            <date>May 23, 1927</date> 
         </creation>

         <textClass>

            <keywords scheme="#">

               <term>WE'LL
LET NANCY DETERMINE THESE</term>

            </keywords>

         </textClass>

      </profileDesc></teiHeader>

   <text>

      <front>

         <div1>

            <bibl>
               <title level="u">Letter, H.F.
Perkins to Eugenics Survey Advisory Committee, enclosed proposal for 
Comprehensive Rural Survey</title>
               <date>May 23, 1927</date>
               <note type="location" anchored="true">Paul Amos Moody papers, T. J. Allen file, Box #181, University of Vermont 
Archives</note> 
               <note type="restriction" anchored="true">Permission required for reproduction. University of Vermont, Archives.</note>
            </bibl> 
         </div1>

      </front>

      <body>

         <div1>

            <div2>


               <opener rend="recon">
                  <address>
                     <addrLine>EUGENICS SURVEY OF
VERMONT</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>UNDER AUSPICES OF</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>UNIVERSITY OF
VERMONT</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>DEPARTMENT OF
ZOOLOGY</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>DIRECTOR.</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>H. F. PERKINS</addrLine>

                     <addrLine>IN CHARGE OF FIELD RESEARCH.</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>HARRIETT E.
ABBOTT</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>489 MAIN STREET </addrLine>
                     <addrLine>BURLINGTON, VT. 
</addrLine>
                     <addrLine>TELEPHONE 1063</addrLine>
                  </address>
                  <date>May 23,
1927</date>
                  <salute>Dear Friend:</salute>
               </opener>

               <p>I am handing you herewith the
outline of a rather pretentious plan for a comprehensive cooperative
study of rural conditions in Vermont. This all comes out of our
Eugenics Survey and our Advisory Committee will have a good deal
to do with the study if it comes about. It is going to cost a lot of
money but I think the various organizations that have indicated a
willingness to participate are amply able to take care of their own
part of the work and I am now trying to secure the promise of one of
one of the larger foundations to underwrite the overhead connected
with the unifying of the plan, preliminary conferences, and final
publication of joint results.</p>

               <p>I shall be very glad if you find it possible to look over this
plan and give me your estimate on the following points, <hi>providing</hi> it is possible to secure the cooperation of a dozen or
so organizations locally involved ‐‐ <hi>providing</hi> the
necessary funds are forthcoming ‐‐ and <hi>providing</hi> a very
wise and capable man can be secured for general chairman.</p>

               <p>
                  <list type="simple">
                     <item>1.  Is such an undertaking desirable in
your opinion?</item>
                     <item>2.  Is it a practical plan for Vermont?</item>
                     <item>3.  Is Vermont 
a good place to choose for the working out
of such an experiment?</item>
                     <item>4.  Is it possible to secure enough local 
cooperation to make the study and afterwards to carry into effect in any considerable
part of the recommendations?</item>
                     <item>5.  Is it a strategic time for such a 
study?</item>
                     <item>6.  In 
view of your answers to the above, do you favor the participation of the Eugenics
Survey?</item>
                  </list>
               </p>

               <closer>
                  <salute>Sincerely,</salute>
                  <signed>[H. F. Perkins]</signed>
                  <lb/>DIRECTOR OF THE 
EUGENICS SURVEY</closer> 
            </div2>

            <div2>

               <head>
                  <hi rend="center">
                     <hi rend="uline">A COMPREHENSIVE
RURAL SURVEY OF VERMONT.</hi>
                     <lb/>
INTRODUCTION</hi>
               </head>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="center">THE 
PRESENT EUGENICS SURVEY</hi>
               </p> 

               <p>For a period of twenty months, a survey has been
conducted in Vermont for the purpose of finding out all that could be
learned in regard to a series of sixty two defective and delinquent
families. The accompanying preliminary report, recently published,
gives a statement of the results up to February, 1927, and the
typewritten statement, also enclosed, outlined briefly the plan for a
continuation of the work.</p>

               <p>The present effort is in the direction of compilation and
correlation of the results thus are gathered in regard to these sixty
two families.  A general history of each family and a family tree chart
showing the status of the individuals thus far discovered, back as far
as six generations, are being prepared. This will include a very large
mass of data all of which bears on the causes and results of the
deficiency and criminal tendencies of the families.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="center">THE RURAL PROBLEM</hi>
               </p>

               <p>Throughout the entire survey, both in the
field work and in the compilation of data thus far acquired, it has
been forcefully brought to the attention of the workers that the
problems of delinquency and deficiency in Vermont are very largely
affected by, if not the results of, rural conditions. Vermont is
conspicuously a rural state. The whole question of crime, disease,
and feeblemindedness interlocks very intimately with the conditions
in the country. Every phase of rural life has its bearing upon urban
life, especially in a state in which the rural population so
overwhelmingly preponderates.</p>

               <p>These conditions in the isolated rural sections appear to have
been studied in no comprehensive and exhaustive fashion. Many
surveys and studies have been conducted in this country and
elsewhere both intensively and extensively, but so far as can be
discovered some particular phase of rural life has been the subject of
the investigation. The merit, if any, of a comprehensive survey lies
in the interrelations of the several phases of human activity. A study
of the cause of the declining population may disclose the relation of
any one of the phases of rural life to that decline but the probabilities
are that no single explanation suffices.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="center">RELATION OF
SUBNORMALCY TO DECLINING POPULATION</hi>
               </p>

               <p>The Advisory Committee of the Eugenics Survey are
convinced that a comprehensive study will bring out the importance
of the mental status of people of all ages as a cause of the declining
population. Undoubtedly we look at the matter from a biased point
of view, but we are strongly inclined to believe that the degree of
intelligence of a community will be found to serve as a yardstick for
the efficiency of the farms, the schools, the social clubs, the
churches, and other elements in the life of the people which have
"stayed on the farm".</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="center">THE 1926‐27 MENTAL STUDY</hi>
               </p>

               <p>Through the generosity of the
National Committee for Mental Hygiene, New York City, a
psychiatric and psychological study of over a thousand school
children was made in connection with the Eugenics Survey. This
work was done in the period from November to April, 1926‐27, and
the report is expected from the office of the National Committee
within the month.</p>

               <p>The children studied were from four selected areas. The
choice was made on the basis of the representative character of the
four areas, and an attempt was thereby made to discover the mental
status of a typical cross section of the school population of Vermont.
Only one of the areas could therefore be a really rural school district.
It is highly desirable that a similar study be made in conjunction with
the general comprehensive survey which is now planned.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="center">PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE
SURVEY</hi>
               </p>

               <p>It is a well‐known fact that
the population of Vermont as a whole has been losing rather than
gaining in numbers for a considerable period.  Also, that the falling
off in the country districts has been alarming. In one area where there
were six good rural schools twenty years ago, there are now only
two. Farms are abandoned, churches and stores closed. What is the
cause of this desertion? Is it poor soil, the attraction of the city,
inadequate marketing facilities, or are the schools and amusements
too poor to hold the population?</p>

               <p>The study can be divided into the following parts:‐‐</p>

               <p>
                  <list type="simple">
                     <item>1. Agricultural. Study of soils, crops,
live stock.</item>
                     <item>2. Farm Economics. Transportation, markets, cooperative
marketing organizations, relations to extension staff of State
University.</item>
                     <item>3. Farm labor. Quality and cost of farm hands and
kitchen help.</item>
                     <item>4. Religious opportunities. Churches and Bible schools,
denominational connections, community churches.</item>
                     <item>5. Schools. Buildings, teachers, interest of the
community.</item>
                     <item>6. Recreation. Clubs, social organizations, movies,
magazines, libraries.</item>
                     <item>7. Medical study. Number and character of doctors,
hospital opportunities, medical inspection of school children, visiting
nurses. Relation of the Shepard‐Towner bill.</item>
                     <item>8. Races. Distribution of native Americans, French
Canadians, Europeans. Their connection with each of the above
divisions of the study. Relative permanence in the population of each
race.</item>
                     <item>9. Politics. Political affiliations, connection of races
thereto, the voting and an non‐voting part of the population and the
causes of non‐voting.</item>
                     <item>10. Mental study. The mental status of all ages,
representation in the state institutions for insane and feebleminded.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN SUBNORMALCY AND RURAL
DETERIORATION.</item>
                  </list>
               </p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <head>
                  <hi rend="center">SUMMARY OF THE PLAN</hi>
               </head>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="center">DIRECTOR</hi>
               </p>

               <p>As elaborate a study as is herein outlined would require the
supervision of an expert. It is anticipated that the co‐operating
agencies would first choose a director of the survey. He should be a
recognized authority on rural sociology. A man of national reputation
is clearly called for.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <p>
                  <hi rend="center">THE TEN DIVISIONS</hi>
               </p>

               <p>A brief outline of the phases of investigation which
have already been suggested for each of the ten headings is here
given.</p>

               <p>
                  <list type="simple">
                     <item>1. <hi rend="uline">Agricultural</hi>.
Suggested agency: ‐‐Vermont Experiment Station through the Purnell
fund. The question to be answered is, “Can a more intelligent
handling of the local farms be made to pay?' The study would include
soil analyses with reference to the best crops to be raised and as to
the parts of the soil which are profitably tillable, which should be
used for grazing, which for reforesting, etc. The question of
fertilizers, drainage of swamp‐land, rotation of crops, diversification
or unification of crops would also come under this investigation. It
would be necessary to put two or more investigators into the field for
a thorough study.</item>
                     <item>2. <hi rend="uline">Farm economics .</hi>Apart from the 
strictly agricultural aspects of the study the financial side of the problem
seems to call for a special group of investigators. These workers
should go into the matter of size and value of the farms, amount and
cost of farm labor, per capita output, and gross and net earnings of a
selected group of typical farms in each community studied. The
several sources of income should be tabulated in order to discover
and then to inform the farmers as to the part of his business that is
most profitable, and the part, if any, that is losing money. The
questions of budgets and of bookkeeping for the farmers might
involve too much of a campaign of education to come within the
proper sphere of this study, but it might be possible to start such a
movement in the community.<lb/>The other headings given above for this heading, “Farm economics,
are self‐explanatory, and the difficulty will be to limit this field to a
practical working division of the main problem.</item>
                     <item>3. <hi rend="uline">Farm 
labor.</hi> If 
it seems best to make a separate study of this question, that part of the study of farm
economics which was given this title should be turned over to a
separate worker in order to discover to what extent the efficiency of
farm labor, including that in the farm home, affects the net income.
There would plainly be a direct bearing of a mental study upon this
question. The probability of using young men and young women who
have received proper training in institutions needs investigation, and
the lessons therefrom might be profitably applied in our Vermont
communities.</item>
                     <item>4. <hi rend="uline">Religious opportunities.</hi> Denominational
and interdenominational agencies have already gone into the matter
of the rural church and a great deal has been written about it in the
religious and secular press. Perhaps this comprehensive study will
throw some additional light upon the question, What is the matter
with the country churches? It may likewise be true that the country
churches, good, bad, and indifferent, will be found to have a good
deal to do with the social life and general welfare of the area that
they serve. It is possible, that far greater usefulness could be achieved
by the rural church. The information has probably been collected
already and can be obtained by the Director of the Survey from the
various agencies that have it in their records.</item>
                     <item>5. <hi rend="uline">Schools.</hi> Full information concerning the
rural schools, their teachers, their buildings, the appropriations for
maintenance and improvement, and the amount of interest shown by
the community in its schools can probably be secured at the office of
the Commissioner of Education. The Steele report is an example of
work done by an outsider on the question of the salaries and training
of rural teachers. All this information needs to be supplemented by
the mentality of the school children and the psychological factors that
enter into difficult cases of discipline, retarded progress, etc.<lb/>There is very little prospect of starting in the country schools of
Vermont special classes for training subnormal children. Some
means, however, should if possible be devised for taking care at least
in the most elementary way of that rather considerable part of the
population.</item>
                     <item>6. <hi rend="uline">Recreation.</hi> Here is an important phase
of community life to which a number of agencies have already given
attention in various parts of the country. A study of all the
recreational opportunities of the communities selected for this
comprehensive study could not fail to be illuminating in connection
with the other aspects. This study should be made to include adult
education since it is probably through the clubs and lodges that the
organized informing of the adult population is best carried out. A
census of the magazines, books and newspapers subscribed to or read
by the people would be most enlightening.</item>
                     <item>7. <hi rend="uline">Medical 
study.</hi> An 
examination of information already in the hands of the President of the University of
Vermont on the matter of the medical facilities in country districts
should be made with reference to the selected localities. What kind
of doctors are within reach if there are any? How far do the people
have to go for hospital treatment and what are the opportunities at the
hospitals, if any, that are within reach? What are the chances for the
establishment of rural hospitals supposing that assistance could be
secured for the building and equipping of such? Is there full
cooperation between the people and the available agencies such as the
Children's Aid Society, the State Department of Public Welfare, the
State Board of Health including the antituberculosis society and the
workers under the Shepard‐‐Towner measure? Is there any
opportunity for organizing a visiting nurse association in the
community or for adopting some plan for subsidizing more doctors?</item>
                     <item>8. <hi rend="uline">Races.</hi> Most of the questions that might
be asked under this heading would probably be answered by an
analysis of the findings of the investigators in other divisions. The
nativity and racial connections of all persons interrogated by any of
the other groups would be readily obtainable. We have been charged
with sending out of Vermont the low‐grade old colonial stock and
also with allowing that same class of the population to form pockets
of degeneracy back in the hills. The relationship between all the
various causes of futility and ineffectiveness on the one hand and
racial connections on the other hand together with the permanence or
migratory tendencies of the various elements should be investigated.</item>
                     <item>9. <hi rend="uline">Politics.</hi> The question here is in regard
to the connection if any between religious or racial affiliations and
indifference to the suffrage. What is the cause of the failure to vote?
Do the races or the religious sects have any tendency to stick together
with one party or another or to refrain from voting at elections? What
is the attitude of the local village or town government to that of the
state and the nation? Is there any cooperation in the matter of
appraisal of property for taxation and any opportunity for cooperative
handling of that task?</item>
                     <item>10. <hi rend="uline">Mental study.</hi> As indicated 
above this seems to the Advisory Committee of the Eugenics Survey of
Vermont to be the keystone of the entire problem. The relation of
subnormalcy to each of the several aspects of the study would seem
to be a very important matter to discover. It should be the principal
aim of those in charge of this division to endeavor to formulate a
definite program, statewide in its bearings, for the betterment of the
population in regard to mentality. A study of the facilities at the
existing institutions has already been made by the psychiatric unit in
1926 and 1927. Recommendations for additional facilities or for
revisions of those now available and plans for increasing these
facilities by means of state appropriations should form the chief part
of any report to be made by the students of this part of the problem.
Suggested agency:‐‐The National Committee for Mental Hygiene
which has so generously and effectively cooperated in the present
survey is the logical agency to carry on this phase of the study. It has
already been intimated that the National Committee for Mental
Hygiene would in all probability be glad to take care of this part of
the study, providing the whole program is carried out.</item>
                  </list>
               </p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <head>
                  <hi rend="center">PARTICIPATING AGENCIES</hi>
               </head>

               <p>Such a comprehensive study is obviously in
line with the work of a number of national organizations. Many of
these have already participated in somewhat similar studies in
various parts of the country. All such agencies should be brought
together into a cooperative group for the conduct of this program.
They should be represented on a joint committee which should
include also the present Advisory Committee of the Eugenics Survey
of Vermont or its representatives. The working out of the plan for the
study and the method of conducting the same should be the duty of
this general committee. While it is impossible to forecast with any
certainty what is going to be involved, it might be suggested as a
basis of calculation that a full year's study beginning in April, l928
and engaging a group of ten workers in the field and in their offices
for that time together with the necessary incidental expenses would
necessarily run into a considerable sum of money. Seventy five
thousand dollars is suggested as a very rough guess as the amount
necessary. The committee would be under the necessity of devising
means of securing this amount of money before the undertaking
could begin.</p>

               <p>The following organizations have been approached in regard
to the above plan for a comprehensive study in Vermont: ‐‐ The
National Committee for Mental Hygiene.  Person interviewed was
Dr. Frankwood K. Williams, Medical Director of the National
Committee for Mental Hygiene.</p>

               <p>The Commonwealth Fund, and the Rural Hospital Division
of the Commonwealth Fund, Persons interviewed were Miss Quinn,
Assistant Director of the Commonwealth Fund, and Dr. Southmate,
Director of the Rural Hospital Division of the Commonwealth Fund.</p>

               <p>The American Country Life Association. Person interviewed
was Mr. Henry Israel, Executive Secretary of the American Country
Life Association.</p>

               <p>The National Research Council. Person interviewed was Mr.
Gano Dunn, chairman of the Executive Committee of the National
Research Council.</p>

               <p>The Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Fund. Person
interviewed was Dr. Ruml, Executive Head of the Laura Spelman
Memorial.</p>

               <p>The Social Science Research Council. Approached by way
of a letter from Professor Daniel B. Carroll of the Department of
Political Science of the University to President Hall of the University
of Oregon, who is Chairman of the Executive Council.</p>

               <p>The general impression from all the interviews was that of
surprising cordiality on the part of almost every one of the people
who were seen. They gave generously of their time to consider the
plan and the writer came away from each interview with a very
definite impression of having been given very cordial and
sympathetic encouragement in the undertaking. These were
preliminary interviews. It is not expected that any organization would
be willing to tie itself up to the plan on first hearing of it. There is no
question of the readiness of a number of the executives who were
seen to use their influence towards a cooperative undertaking and the
participation of their own organizations</p>

               <p>Reasonable hope of cooperation and financial help has been
held out by one organization, namely, the National Committee for
Mental Hygiene. There is ground for thinking that the Social Science
Research Council may shoulder the responsibility for their part of the
program, and that the American Country Life Association may be
able to secure sufficient funds to engage in a part of the study such
as the sociological survey with reference to amusements, recreation,
etc., and perhaps also the necessary overhead for coordinating the
various divisions.</p>

            </div2>

            <div2>

               <head>
                  <hi rend="center">CONCLUSIONS</hi>
               </head>

               <p>The purpose of this study is not solely to gather
facts. It seems not unreasonable to expect that the results will lead
directly to constructive effort and legislation that will tend to hasten
the present barely visible tendency to check the loss of population in
rural areas of Vermont, and similarly of every state in the union. The
aim is therefore practical as well as purely scientific.</p>

            </div2>

         </div1>

      </body>

      <back>

         <div1>

            <p>
               <hi rend="bold">Publication Restrictions:</hi>
               <lb/>

The images and text on this web site are solely for education and research
uses. With the exception of government documents, images and texts may not
be used in digital or print form by organizations or commercial
enterprises except with written permission of the copyright holder or the
repository of origin. The materials may be used in digital or print form
with appropriate source citation in unpublished reports, classroom
instruction, research, community forums, and other non-profit
activities.<lb/>


               <lb/>
               <hi rend="bold">Permission required for reproduction.</hi>
               <lb/>
Archives, Bailey/Howe Library<lb/>
University of Vermont<lb/>
Burlington, VT 05405<lb/>
            </p>

         </div1>

      </back>

   </text>

</TEI>
