| Page | Line | Correction |
| 27 | Fig 2.9 | The leaf for males/stem = 6 should be 6, not .6. Thanks to Marie Thomas at Cal St U San Marcos |
| 30 | 11 lines from bottom | I intended (sigma X)^2 not sigma X^2. Of all that places to make that error, this was the dumbest. Thanks to Robert Fierro at Pitzer College. |
| 90 | middle | Mark Yates, at the Univ. of South Alabama, pointed out that I wrote "p < .5" when I should have written "p < .05." |
| 96 | End paragraph 2 | Jennifer Pollock at Texas Tech pointed out that the paragraph should end with "different means" rather than with "same mean." That was a dumb error. |
| 102 | 4th line from bottom | Replace the Greek letters eta and nu with "h" and "n". Thanks to Marie Thomas at Cal St U San Marcos |
| 104 | First full para--4th line from bottom | The Greek sigma should be a Greek alpha. Thanks to Marie Thomas at Cal St U San Marcos |
| 124 | Last equation | p(P|NU) = .10, not .15, so the result would be .513 instead of .413. Thanks to Michael Warren at Clarment Graduate University. Thanks to Michael Warren at Claremont Graduate University. |
| 125 | First paragraph of Second Example | First, delete the second sentence from the end in that paragraph. Next, change p(g|B) to p(b}G). |
| 365 | Middle of page | "FW is in the general vicinity of c*alpha'," not c*alpha. |
| 372 | Middle of page | The value of phi is -1.5, not -2.5. Thanks to Amanda le at Harvard. |
| 388 | Calculation of d2 | The label is wrong. It should read "M-S, M-M, S-S versus S-M, Mc-M". Thanks to Amanda le at Harvard. |
| 396 | Line 9 | FEW should be FWE. |
| 398 | Table 12.8 | Someone, I forgot who, noted that Dunnett's test, which compares each mean with a control mean, is almost by definition an a priori test. Good point!! But it is traditionally listed as a post hoc test. |
| 428 | Line 7 | I wrote that the "Total" in the SPSS summary table is Σ X2/N. That is silly. Delete the N. I seem to have been thinking about the correction factor, which is (Σ X)2/N Thanks to Nathan Smith at McGill. |
| 537 | Figure 15.4 | There is supposed to be a box around that diagram. 100% of the variance is assumed to be contained within that box. David Scott and the University of Chester pointed this out. |
