
![[Sources]](/universe/media/images/academic/a2_src2a.gif)
![[Results List]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_reslst.gif)
![[Return to Search]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_rtsrch.gif)
![[Previous Document]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_prvdoc.gif)
![[Next Document]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_nxtdoc.gif)
![[Full View]](/universe/media/images/academic/c_fullvw.gif)
Document 3 of 112.
National Library of Medicine MEDLINE Database
TITL: A close look at
therapeutic touch.
AUTH: Rosa L; Rosa E; Sarner L; Barrett S
ORGA: Questionable Nurse Practices Task Force, National Council Against Health Fraud
Inc, Loveland, Colo, USA.
CITE: JAMA 1998 Apr 1; 279 (13): 1005-10JAMA 1998 Apr 1; 279 (13): 1005-10
LANG: ENG; English
ABST: CONTEXT:
Therapeutic Touch (TT) is a widely used nursing practice rooted in mysticism but alleged to have
a scientific basis. Practitioners of TT claim to treat many medical conditions
by using their hands to manipulate a
"human
energy field" perceptible above the patient's skin. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether TT
practitioners can actually perceive a
"human energy field." DESIGN: Twenty-one practitioners with TT experience for from 1 to 27 years
were tested under blinded conditions to determine whether they could
correctly identify which of their hands was closest to the investigator's hand.
Placement of the investigator's hand was determined by flipping a coin.
Fourteen practitioners were tested 10 times each, and 7 practitioners were
tested 20 times each. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Practitioners of TT were
asked to state whether the investigator's unseen hand hovered above their right
hand or their left hand. To show the validity of TT theory, the practitioners
should have been able to locate the investigator's hand 100% of the time. A
score of 50% would be expected through
chance alone. RESULTS: Practitioners of TT identified the correct hand in only
123 (44%) of 280 trials, which is close to what would be expected for random
chance. There was no significant correlation between the practitioner's score
and length of experience (r=0.23). The
statistical power of this experiment was sufficient to conclude that if TT
practitioners could reliably detect a human energy field, the study would have
demonstrated this. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-one experienced TT practitioners were
unable to detect the investigator's
"energy field." Their failure to substantiate TT's most
fundamental claim is unrefuted evidence that the claims of TT are groundless
and that further professional use is unjustified. (AUTHOR)
MJTR:
Therapeutic Touch.
MNTR: Human.
Research Design.
Statistics. JOURNAL ARTICLE
GEOT: UNITED STATES
IDEN: ISSN: 0098-7484.
JOURNAL-CODE: KFR.
ENTRY-DATE: 980408.
JOURNAL-SUBSET: A M X.
IM-DATE: 9806.
ACCE: 98192170
![[Results List]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_reslst.gif)
![[Return to Search]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_rtsrch.gif)
![[Previous Document]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_prvdoc.gif)
![[Next Document]](/universe/media/images/academic/b_nxtdoc.gif)
![[Full View]](/universe/media/images/academic/c_fullvw.gif)
![[Sources]](/universe/media/images/academic/a2_src2a.gif)
Copyright ©
1998 LEXIS®-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.
All rights reserved.