AMERICAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE VIDEOS

Videos are for the most part from the World Debate Institute.
To view internet video you should have both RealPlayer and QuickTime installed on your computer. Discover new media!

AMERICAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE VIDEO INSTRUCTION SERIES
World Debate Institute, University of Vermont
John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College, Series Director

AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE NOW!

PART

TITLE

INSTRUCTOR

TIME

A

Format: theory and strategy

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

45 minutes

B

Proposition analysis and interpretation

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

36 minutes

C

The Proposition case: constructing, researching, briefing

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

62 minutes

D

Points of information

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

40 minutes

E

Public speaking: the challenge of dynamism

Alfred C. Snider, University of Vermont

56 minutes

F

Disadvantages

John Gordon Miller, University of Vermont

65 minutes

G

Counterplans: advocacy for the opposition

Steve Woods, Western Washington University

58 minutes

H

Burdens of proof: issues and tests

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

38 minutes

I

Speaker duties

Steve Woods, Western Washington University

55 minutes

J

Critique

Kate Shuster, Claremont McKenna College

57 minutes

K

Rebuttals and weighing issues

Steve Llano, University of Rochester

60 minutes

L

Training drills and exercises

Alfred C. Snider, University of Vermont

31 minutes

M

Heckling and humor

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

32 minutes

O

Advanced seminar one

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

46 minutes

N

Advanced seminar two

Kate Shuster, Claremont McKenna College

32 minutes

P

Values and criteria: making a decision

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

41 minutes

Q

Other formats

John K. Meany, Claremont McKenna College

35 minutes

 

 

 

 

OTHER PARLIAMENTARY DEBATING VIDEOS

 HOW TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT, Alfred C. Snider, University of Vermont

LECTURES
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
Preparation for Parliamentary Debating
Panel Discussion

John Meany, Claremont
Lisa Heller, Bates
Jud Legum, Claremont
Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union
This House would post the ten commandments in public school classrooms
Bill Herman, Colorado State University, NPDA 1999 champion, Jethro Hayman, Cornell University, Eastern USA Debater of the Year 1996 VS. Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union & Arkansas State University, Terry McKnight, Forestworld.com, USA NDT Top Speaker 1972. Floor speeches included.
Being the Government: Proposition Strategy
Judd Legum
Claremont Colleges/Georgetown Law
This House would give reparations for slavery
Part One | Part Two
Judd Legum, Claremont Colleges, twice national round robin champion, Jethro Hayman, Cornell VS. Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union, Terry McKnight, Forestworld.com
Opposition Strategy
Marc Whitmore
English Speaking Union
National Parliamentary Debate Association National Championship 1999 Part One | Part Two
Creighton University(Mathey/Syrek) vs Colorado State University (Brodak/Herman) For More Information Visit the NPDA website
Points of Information
John Meany
Claremont Colleges
Racism contributes to US policy towards Africa
NPDA Octafinal Debate
Government: Univ of California at Berkeley
Opposition: Creighton University
Denver, Colorado, USA, March, 2001
Psychology of Debating
Marc Whitmore
English Speaking Union
This House would end the death penalty
Demonstration debate between Judd Legum, Claremont, and Marc Whitmore, English Speaking Union
WDI, 2000
Reasoning & Probability
David Berube
University of South Carolina

The Rehnquist court made the wrong decision.
NPDA Semifinal Debate
Government: Univ of Wyoming
Opposition: Truman State University
Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001

Judge and Audience Adaptation
Judd Legum
Claremont Colleges

Despite negative consequences, we should act in accordance with principle.
NPDA Final Debate
Government: Univ of California at Berkeley
Opposition: University of Wyoming
Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001

Speaking with Dynamism
Alfred C. Snider
University of Vermont
Despite negative consequences, we should act in accordance with principle.
NPDA Final Debate
Government: Univ of California at Berkeley
Opposition: University of Wyoming
Denver, Colorado, USA. March, 2001
Value Argumentation
John Meany
Claremont Colleges
The US needs a cultural renaissance
NPDA Quarterfinal Debate
Government: Truman State University
Opposition: Univ of Californoia at Berkeley
Denver, Colorado, USA, March, 2001
Counterpositions in Parliamentary Debating
Steve Woods
William Jewell College

 

Government Case Building
Part One | Part Two
WDI 1999
 
 
Opposition Strategy
Part One | Part Two
WDI 1999
 
On Public Debate
Part One | Part Two
WDI 1999
 
 
 
 

FROM LA TORNEO HISPANOAMERICANO DE DEBATE

This house would give leadership training to ethnic minorities
Gobierno: Espana y Argentina
Oposicion: Estado Unidos & Espana
Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile, May, 2001

Esta Bancada reservara cargos publicos para las minorias
Gobierno: Argentina & Nicaragua
Oposicion: Espana & Nicaragua
Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile, May, 2001