Paraeducator Training Project

Initial Survey Results

(pdf version available)
(Download Acrobat Reader for Free to View pdf files!)

What do Paraeducators and their Supervisors Need to Know and be able to Do? Raw Data

Method: Questionnaire

Purpose: To ascertain perceived importance of topical areas of training paraeducators and professionals who supervise them.

Dates of data collection: Fall 1998

Project Staff:
Michael F. Giangreco, Project Director
Eileen CichoskiKelly, Project Coordinator
Linda Backus, Project Associate
Priscilla Sherman-Tucker, Project Associate
Chris CichoskiKelly, Technology Specialist

Number of respondents: 153

Return Rate: 28%

Background Characteristics:

Grade level respondents work with:

PreKindergarten-8 grade: 41%
High school: 17%
Across grades (k-12): 37%
Others less than 2%
Missing data: 3%

Level of education of respondents:

HS/GED: 12%
Associates: 5%
Bachelor's: 20%
Master's: 41%
Certificate of Advanced Study (CAS): 5%
Doctorate: 17%

Race of respondents:

Caucasian: 89%
Black: 5%
Hispanic: 4%
Asian American: 1%
Native American <1%

Role of respondents:

State Ed: 14%
General educator: 6%
University: 10%
Parent: 11%
Professional Organization: 3%
Spec. Educator: 19%
Advocate: 3%
Related Service: 11%
Paraeducator: 16%
School administrator: 7%

Sex of respondents:

Female: 89%
Male: 11%

State of Respondents:

36 states were represented.

States with representation greater than 2% include:

Vermont: 28%
Idaho: 7%
California: 5%
Colorado: 5%
New York: 5%
Maine: 4%
Washington: 4%
Iowa: 3%
Kansas: 3%
Nevada: 3%

States with representation less than 2% include:
Alaska Illinois Montana Oklahoma West Virginia
Arkansas Indiana

Nebraska

Oregon Wisconsin
Connecticut Louisiana New Hampshire Rhode Island
Florida Massachusetts North Carolina South Dakota
Georgia Michigan North Dakota Texas
Hawaii Minnesota Ohio Virginia

Years of Experience working with Paraeducators:

range is from 0 years (1%) to 30 years (<1%)

0 years: 1%
1-5 years: 34%
6-9 years: 16%
10-15 years: 31%
17-20 years: 11%
22-30 years: 7%

Note: All responses are based on a Likert-style scale from 1-5 with 1 as "not important" and 5 as " critically important" for the survey topic listed below. The responses are summarized by number of persons who responded to the topic (n) and percentage of persons who responded to the topic (%) for each item.

Perceived Importance of Topical Areas for Entry-level Training of Paraeducators
Survey
Topic

1

not important

2

3

4

5

critically important

Collaborative teamwork

n=0

n=2

1%

n=16

11%

n=47

32%

n=84

56%

Paraeducator
roles and responsibilities

n=0

n=4

3%

n=14

9%

n=48

32%

n=84

56%

Curriculum & Instruction

n=0

n=7

5%

n=21

14%

n=40

27%

n=81

54%

Inclusive
education

n=0

n=9

6%

n=23

15%

n=39

26%

n=79

53%

Characteristics
of children with various disabilities

n=0

n=10

7%

n=30

20%

n=37

24%

n=74

49%

Roles and responsibilities
of others

n=2

1%

n=12

8%

n=37

25%

n=60

40%

n=39

26%

Multicultural &
Family issues

n=2

1%

n=30

20%

n=51

34%

n=38

25%

n=29

20%

Perceived Importance of Topical Areas for Training for Supervisors of Paraeducators
Survey Topic

1

not important

2

3

4

5

critically

important

Collaborative teamwork & effective communication strategies

n=0

n=6

4%

n=7

5%

n=35

23%

n=101

68%

Teaching paraprofessionals to implement instruction

n=0

n=8

5%

n=17

11%

n=49

34%

n=75

50%

Roles & responsibilities of paraprofessionals and teachers

n=0

n=99

6%

n=20

13%

n=36

24%

n=85

57%

Supervising instruction of paraprofessionals

n=0

n=15

10%

n=20

13%

n=44

30%

n=69

47%

Planning for the paraeducator

n=0

n=11

8%

n=30

20%

n=42

29%

n=64

43%

Perceived Importance of Topical Areas for Advanced-level Training (beyond Entry-level) of Paraeducators
Survey Topic

1

not important

2

3

4

5

critically

important

Supporting students with Behavior challenges

n=0

n=3

2%

n=15

10%

n=47

32%

n=84

56%

Effective teaching strategies

n=0

n=8

5%

n=16

11%

n=61

41%

n=65

43%

Implementing & monitoring instruction

n=1

1%

n=7

5%

n=20

14%

n=62

42%

n=56

38%

Approaches to literacy: Reading, Math, & Lang. Arts

n=1

1%

n=25

17%

n=35

23%

n=56

37%

n=34

22%

Use of technology

n=3

2%

n=17

11%

n=46

31%

n=59

39%

n=25

17%

Supporting students with low incidence disabilities

n=2

1%

n=25

17%

n=39

28%

n=36

26%

n=39

28%