Positivity of the English language

By analyzing a rather large collection of words (a good fraction of a trillion) we extracted from the New York Times, music lyrics, the Google Books project, and Twitter, we’ve found that English is inherently positive. The manuscript is here, and some early press from Wired is here.

Abstract:

Within the last million years, human language has emerged and evolved as a fundamental instrument of social communication and semiotic representation. People use language in part to convey emotional information, leading to the central and contingent questions: (1) What is the emotional spectrum of natural language? and (2) Are natural languages neutrally, positively, or negatively biased? Previous findings are mixed: suggestive evidence of a positive bias has been found in small samples of English words [1-3], framed as the Pollyanna Hypothesis [3] and Linguistic Positivity Bias [1], while the experimental elicitation of emotional words has instead found a strong negative bias [4]. Here, we report that the human-perceived positivity of over 10,000 of the most frequently used English words exhibits a clear positive bias. More deeply, we characterize and quantify distributions of word positivity for four large and distinct corpora, demonstrating that their form is surprisingly invariant with respect to frequency of word use.

7 thoughts on “Positivity of the English language

  1. Greg LeGore

    It would be interesting to see the results for other, esp. older languages such as those before the enlightenment. For example, a screwdriver (which is used to build things) is, in Spanish, an ‘unscrewer’ (used to take them apart).

    Reply
  2. Pingback: If you’re happy and we know it … are your friends? | onehappybird

  3. Pingback: Se você está feliz e nós sabemos disso … são seus amigos? « RODRIGO

  4. Nichole

    I’m usually to blogging and i must say i admire you. Your posts has actually peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your website and preserve checking for new information.

    Reply

Leave a Reply