Critical Attributes
of WebQuests
Web Quests of either short or long duration are deliberately designed
to make the best use of a learner's time. There is questionable educational
benefit in having learners surfing the net without a clear task in mind,
and most schools must ration student connect time severely. To achieve
that efficiency and clarity of purpose, Web Quests should contain at least
the following parts:
1. An introduction that sets the stage and provides some background
information.
2. A task that is doable and interesting.
3. A set of information sources needed to complete the task. Many (though
not necessarily all) of the resources are embedded in the Web Quest document
itself as anchors pointing to information on the World Wide Web. Information
sources might include web documents, experts available via e-mail or real-time
conferencing, searchable databases on the net, and books and other documents
physically available in the learner's setting. Because pointers to resources
are included, the learner is not left to wander through webspace completely
adrift.
4. A description of the process the learners should go through in accomplishing
the task. The process should be broken out into clearly described steps.
5. Some guidance on how to organize the information acquired. This
can take the form of guiding questions, or directions to complete organizational
frameworks such as timelines, concept maps, or cause-and-effect diagrams.
6. A conclusion that brings closure to the quest, reminds the learners
about what they've learned, and perhaps encourages them to extend the experience
into other domains.
(the information above has been copied or adapted from http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec596/about_webquests.html,
by
Bernie Dodge, San Diego State University.
Some other good examples of webquests can also be found
at:
|
Beginning
1 |
Developing
2 |
Accomplished
3 |
Exemplary
4 |
Score |
Presentation
Identification of
criteria used to select authors
|
no consistent criteria used
|
few criteria used although
consistently used
|
some criteria used and consistently
used
|
all criteria used in a consistent
way
awards won
absence of gender bias
multiculturally inclusive
developmentally appropriate
age appropriate
reading level
do illustrations support
text
quality of illustrations
strong story structure
other books the author
has written
what the critics have
said
|
|
|
Degree and depth
of research to back decisions
|
little research
evident
|
some research
present but it is narrowly represented and little credibility
|
Some documentation
of resources with good array of resources
|
Documentation of Resources
that support selection of authors
Variety of resources
Quality resources used
|
|
|
Ability to offer specific examples
of author's style from their stories
|
No examples offered
and those do not demonstrate author's style
|
Few examples offered
and those do not demonstrate author's style
|
Some examples offered
and that demonstrate author's style, some do not
|
Examples offered and
they accurately demonstrate author's style
|
|
|
Organization
of Presentation
|
No or little preparation
evident.
|
Organization could
be better. Not everyone participated. Selection process not clear.
|
Well organized
but selection process could be clearer. Everyone Participated
|
Very well Organized.
Everyone Participated
Easy to follow selection
process
|
|
|
Student Webquest
|
|
Quality of Questions
|
Questions are poor,
off target and of little variation
|
Some questions are good,
some poor with little variation
|
Questions are satisfactory
and some variation is present
|
Questions are excellent,
some requiring problem solving, some description, some answer factual information.
|
|
|
Suitability of sites included/Information
and grade appropriate
|
Information on sites
is not age/level appropriate
|
Information on most
sites is not age/level appropriate
|
Information on sites
are mostly age/level appropriate
|
information on all sites
is age/level appropriate
|
|
|
Spelling, grammar and visual
organization
|
Numerous grammatical
and spelling errors in webquest and visually
poor.
|
Some grammatical and
spelling errors in webquest and visually satisfactory.
|
Few grammatical or spelling
errors in webquest and visually pleasing
|
No grammatical or spelling
errors in webquest and visually
appealing |
|
|
Relevant to Author Study.
|
Webquest is not about
a children's author
|
Webquest is about an
author but questions don't help children learn more about the author's
style
|
Webquest asks some
questions about Author and increases children's awareness of their other
books and style.
|
Webquest asks some
questions about Author and increases children's awareness of their other
books and style.
|
|
|
Feedback from K-12 students
|
Not included
|
Little feedback
|
Some Feedback but questions
asked were not included
|
Students questions included,
More than one student asked to complete the webquest
|
|
|
Rubric for assessing student's
success
|
Not included
|
Not relevant to questions
asked
|
Relevant but incomplete
|
Relevant to questions
asked and assesses student learning.
|
|
|
Self reflection about assignment
|
Not included
|
Not reflective
|
Some reflection
|
Thoughtful reflection |
|